Fat chance

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #68,316 by wharris2 12/12/02 12:59:40 AM Reply	Fat chance With IBM formally canning OS/2, you think anyone (even them) would OS/2 it?
Post #68,339 by hnick 12/12/02 7:32:33 AM Reply	You may have misunderstood me. I was hoping that IBM would treat Rational like OS/2, ie. canning it, not porting to it.

I.B.M. to Acquire Rational in Big Move Into Software - (bluke) - (33) - Dec. 7, 2002, 03:58:56 PM EST

I sincerely hope they OS/2 it... - (hnick) - (14) - Dec. 8, 2002, 08:31:22 AM EST

Ditto -NT - (tuberculosis) - Dec. 8, 2002, 03:37:52 PM EST

Jus what I expected... - (Arkadiy) - (9) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:38:53 AM EST

Run man run - (tuberculosis) - (8) - Dec. 9, 2002, 04:00:47 PM EST

OT: I recently figured out your picture. - (Another Scott) - (7) - Dec. 9, 2002, 05:45:06 PM EST

OT: Yep, the picture needs to be square to avoid distortion -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Dec. 9, 2002, 07:55:21 PM EST

Awright AWRIGHT ALREADY! - (tuberculosis) - (5) - Dec. 10, 2002, 11:40:49 AM EST

Gimp. HTH! :-) - (admin) - (3) - Dec. 10, 2002, 11:41:53 AM EST

Tried that one - core dumps filled up the hard disk. :-P -NT - (tuberculosis) - (2) - Dec. 10, 2002, 01:28:55 PM EST

On what platform? - (admin) - (1) - Dec. 10, 2002, 01:30:03 PM EST

Mac OS X - (tuberculosis) - Dec. 10, 2002, 02:59:40 PM EST

There...MUCH better! -NT - (jb4) - Dec. 10, 2002, 01:49:14 PM EST

I actually saw it run, once - (wharris2) - Dec. 10, 2002, 05:24:01 PM EST

Fat chance - (wharris2) - (1) - Dec. 12, 2002, 12:59:40 AM EST

You may have misunderstood me. - (hnick) - Dec. 12, 2002, 07:32:33 AM EST

Re: Rational grabs IBM after flirting with MS who planed to - (dmarker) - Dec. 8, 2002, 08:42:45 AM EST

Well there goes another big company to the wayside - (andy kaufman) - (15) - Dec. 10, 2002, 01:03:18 AM EST

Re: Off beam - lets be fair about this - (dmarker) - (9) - Dec. 10, 2002, 07:41:52 PM EST

OT: Wow, Doug, you're a LOT cuter than I'd have thought! :-) -NT - (CRConrad) - (3) - Dec. 11, 2002, 07:25:59 AM EST

naw, floggin one of the grands :-) -NT - (boxley) - Dec. 11, 2002, 07:34:50 AM EST

Re: CRC - please accept my appology - was a trick - (dmarker) - (1) - Dec. 12, 2002, 09:42:41 PM EST

Figured; just kidding, "SHE is cute!". No apologies needed. -NT - (CRConrad) - Dec. 13, 2002, 03:52:21 AM EST

Re: Off beam - lets be fair about this - (deSitter) - (2) - Dec. 11, 2002, 10:15:42 AM EST

Re PIC - See other explanations I posted - BUT, I did find - (dmarker) - (1) - Dec. 12, 2002, 09:46:33 PM EST

Re: Re PIC - See other explanations I posted - BUT - (deSitter) - Dec. 12, 2002, 10:24:37 PM EST

OT: Must you be that cute? - (Arkadiy) - (1) - Dec. 11, 2002, 02:48:13 PM EST

Re: She does me too :-) - (dmarker) - Dec. 12, 2002, 09:49:29 PM EST

Notes and Linux. - (static) - (3) - Dec. 10, 2002, 08:03:52 PM EST

Considering just what a bloated piece of... - (inthane-chan) - (2) - Dec. 11, 2002, 11:32:39 AM EST

You should have tried 3.x - (mmoffitt) - Dec. 11, 2002, 03:14:28 PM EST

Please, I'm trying to forget! :) -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Dec. 11, 2002, 10:12:22 PM EST

I'm not running Lotus' office suite for OS/2? - (SpiceWare) - Dec. 11, 2002, 12:49:35 AM EST

Other aspects of the deal: - (admin) - Dec. 13, 2002, 10:05:08 AM EST

Hm. It all seems to cancel out. I’m back to not caring.
105 ms