Re: Readable to me, but odd CSS.

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #67,564 by deSitter 12/9/02 1:19:24 PM Reply	Re: Readable to me, but odd CSS. 1400x1050 - at that res, the default Arial content font is microscopic. I can't understand at this late stage why people don't understand how to make a reasonable CSS. You know, FrontPage for all its problems at least would do that for you... -drl
Post #67,570 by admin 12/9/02 1:37:39 PM 12/9/02 5:16:35 PM Reply	1600x1200 here. (Just bumped it up... woo!) Still looks fine. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..." Edited by admin Dec. 9, 2002, 05:16:35 PM EST Expand All History

Bad Web Design - (deSitter) - (15) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:13:23 AM EST

Fonts look fine to me... -NT - (admin) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:14:45 AM EST

Looks perfectly fine and crisp to me. -NT - (Yendor) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:44:06 AM EST

Re: Bad Web Design - (pwhysall) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:47:53 AM EST

Readable to me, but odd CSS. - (tseliot) - (2) - Dec. 9, 2002, 11:42:31 AM EST

Re: Readable to me, but odd CSS. - (deSitter) - (1) - Dec. 9, 2002, 01:19:24 PM EST

1600x1200 here. - (admin) - Dec. 9, 2002, 05:16:35 PM EST

In the JN sense... - (bepatient) - Dec. 9, 2002, 12:31:51 PM EST

Looks fine here too. - (Another Scott) - (7) - Dec. 9, 2002, 05:33:49 PM EST

Re: Looks fine here too. - (deSitter) - (6) - Dec. 9, 2002, 05:36:11 PM EST

The text in buttons is about 1.2 mm high. Looks Nice & Clear -NT - (Another Scott) - Dec. 9, 2002, 05:39:39 PM EST

Fonts don't look small to me. - (admin) - Dec. 9, 2002, 05:41:16 PM EST

Re: Looks fine here too. - (Yendor) - (3) - Dec. 10, 2002, 04:32:37 AM EST

Re: Looks fine here too. - (deSitter) - (2) - Dec. 10, 2002, 09:55:11 AM EST

If they substituted ems for points.... - (pwhysall) - (1) - Dec. 11, 2002, 12:40:40 AM EST

Re: If they substituted ems for points.... - (deSitter) - Dec. 11, 2002, 09:49:38 AM EST

Well, I should say!
122 ms