IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Readable to me, but odd CSS.
They specify most font-sizes in px, which is legal but odd. I think someone just got px and pt mixed up, given the values selected.

So do you browse at 3200x2400, or just have a 9" monitor? ;)

Many fears are born of stupidity and ignorance -
Which you should be feeding with rumour and generalisation.
BOfH, 2002 "Episode" 10
New Re: Readable to me, but odd CSS.
1400x1050 - at that res, the default Arial content font is microscopic.

I can't understand at this late stage why people don't understand how to make a reasonable CSS. You know, FrontPage for all its problems at least would do that for you...
-drl
New 1600x1200 here.
(Just bumped it up... woo!)

Still looks fine.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Expand Edited by admin Dec. 9, 2002, 05:16:35 PM EST
     Bad Web Design - (deSitter) - (15)
         Fonts look fine to me... -NT - (admin)
         Looks perfectly fine and crisp to me. -NT - (Yendor)
         Re: Bad Web Design - (pwhysall)
         Readable to me, but odd CSS. - (tseliot) - (2)
             Re: Readable to me, but odd CSS. - (deSitter) - (1)
                 1600x1200 here. - (admin)
         In the JN sense... - (bepatient)
         Looks fine here too. - (Another Scott) - (7)
             Re: Looks fine here too. - (deSitter) - (6)
                 The text in buttons is about 1.2 mm high. Looks Nice & Clear -NT - (Another Scott)
                 Fonts don't look small to me. - (admin)
                 Re: Looks fine here too. - (Yendor) - (3)
                     Re: Looks fine here too. - (deSitter) - (2)
                         If they substituted ems for points.... - (pwhysall) - (1)
                             Re: If they substituted ems for points.... - (deSitter)

Now there's a frood who really knows where his towel is.
43 ms