IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Whither Scripting? Forum / Yes, that seems to work.
Post #6,611
by admin
Picture of admin
8/24/01 12:43:26 PM
Reply
New Yes, that seems to work.
But since I've already written by passing the Window object along during traversal, and this would be the first browser-specific code I'd have had to add, I think I'll stick with what I've got.

Thanks.
Regards,

-scott anderson
Post #6,633
by ChrisR
8/24/01 3:00:55 PM
Reply
New Natch
Figured as much, but just wanted to complete the thought. :-)

Looks like the defaultView property may become a w3c standard sometime down the road. One thing that stuck out, though, is that I couldn't find the ownerDocument property in IE5.5 and that is part of the core DOM standard. And Opera JavaScript still seems to be lagging.

I gather y'all are standardizing on the latest builds of Mozilla. Out of curiosity, what IE version are they using? I still have some apps that have to go back to navigator 2.x and ie 3.x, though I'm not sure anybody is still out there using them.
Post #6,677
by admin
Picture of admin
8/25/01 3:34:12 PM
Reply
New Still some problems with DOM in IE 5.5
NOt nearly as bad as the incompatibility problems of the past, but still annoying.

IE treats element attributes completely differently than Mozilla. Mozilla uses the W3C method of treating attributes as child nodes of the element; IE treats the attributes as a mapping on the element.
Regards,

-scott anderson
     Getting the owning window of an HTMLElement? - (admin) - (35) - Aug. 23, 2001, 11:55:41 AM EDT
         *sigh* - (Fearless Freep) - (21) - Aug. 23, 2001, 12:04:28 PM EDT
             You're a lot of help. ;-) - (admin) - (20) - Aug. 23, 2001, 12:16:33 PM EDT
                 thanks! - (Fearless Freep) - (19) - Aug. 23, 2001, 12:24:43 PM EDT
                     Re: thanks! - (admin) - (18) - Aug. 23, 2001, 12:30:09 PM EDT
                         Re: thanks! - (Fearless Freep) - (5) - Aug. 23, 2001, 12:34:58 PM EDT
                             Last impression - (admin) - (4) - Aug. 23, 2001, 12:38:20 PM EDT
                                 Ahh....forgot that - (Fearless Freep) - (3) - Aug. 23, 2001, 12:47:51 PM EDT
                                     Have you considered telling people? - (admin) - (2) - Aug. 23, 2001, 02:09:19 PM EDT
                                         Are you kidding? - (Fearless Freep) - (1) - Aug. 23, 2001, 03:56:33 PM EDT
                                             Well... - (admin) - Aug. 23, 2001, 04:26:08 PM EDT
                         Excuse me? - (ben_tilly) - (11) - Aug. 23, 2001, 04:54:44 PM EDT
                             Well, they're wrong. - (admin) - (10) - Aug. 23, 2001, 05:40:06 PM EDT
                                 Everything has its place - (ben_tilly) - (9) - Aug. 24, 2001, 10:14:21 AM EDT
                                     Your horse is getting taller by the minute. - (tseliot) - (8) - Aug. 24, 2001, 11:45:13 AM EDT
                                         What is a scripting language? - (ben_tilly) - (7) - Aug. 24, 2001, 01:31:34 PM EDT
                                             Good and bad scripting. - (static) - (2) - Aug. 27, 2001, 01:54:23 AM EDT
                                                 Unix scripting... - (ChrisR) - (1) - Aug. 27, 2001, 09:55:57 AM EDT
                                                     That is partly how it was designed - (ben_tilly) - Sept. 3, 2001, 07:25:46 PM EDT
                                             would scripting languages be anything with an interpreter? - (boxley) - (3) - Sept. 2, 2001, 12:29:41 AM EDT
                                                 Yup, IMO. Oh, and you forgot one: Java. -NT - (CRConrad) - Sept. 2, 2001, 08:02:48 PM EDT
                                                 Not necessarily. - (static) - Sept. 3, 2001, 02:19:02 AM EDT
                                                 I wouldn't draw the line there - (ben_tilly) - Sept. 3, 2001, 07:18:31 PM EDT
         Try '.parent' - (drewk) - (12) - Aug. 23, 2001, 12:18:18 PM EDT
             Nope. - (admin) - (11) - Aug. 23, 2001, 12:28:19 PM EDT
                 Either call from the element itself or pass params - (tseliot) - (1) - Aug. 23, 2001, 02:50:37 PM EDT
                     I passed params. - (admin) - Aug. 23, 2001, 03:48:22 PM EDT
                 My stuff's not in front of me... - (ChrisR) - (8) - Aug. 23, 2001, 02:51:58 PM EDT
                     We own all of the frames. - (admin) - (7) - Aug. 23, 2001, 03:49:36 PM EDT
                         hmmm... - (ChrisR) - (5) - Aug. 23, 2001, 06:35:02 PM EDT
                             No dice. - (admin) - (4) - Aug. 24, 2001, 09:02:43 AM EDT
                                 Non standard - (ChrisR) - (3) - Aug. 24, 2001, 11:52:28 AM EDT
                                     Yes, that seems to work. - (admin) - (2) - Aug. 24, 2001, 12:43:26 PM EDT
                                         Natch - (ChrisR) - (1) - Aug. 24, 2001, 03:00:55 PM EDT
                                             Still some problems with DOM in IE 5.5 - (admin) - Aug. 25, 2001, 03:34:12 PM EDT
                         "All your frame are belong to us"? - (Fearless Freep) - Aug. 23, 2001, 06:51:50 PM EDT

I'll be back on you like dumb on Dan Quayle.
300 ms