yabut

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #66,093 by tseliot 12/2/02 11:58:45 AM Reply	yabut I got the impression from IIRC Drew that filtering the mark read function was one of the reasons for doing this in the first place... Many fears are born of stupidity and ignorance - Which you should be feeding with rumour and generalisation. BOfH, 2002 "Episode" 10
Post #66,095 by admin 12/2/02 12:00:14 PM Reply	Re: yabut For which feature? Twit filtering implies not showing posts by the twit. Arkadiy's suggestion, however, stipulates that the posts are still shown but are shown as locked, preventing the shunner from replying. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #66,098 by tseliot 12/2/02 12:05:13 PM Reply	snort sounds like we need a requirements doc. Where's a suit when you need one? :D Many fears are born of stupidity and ignorance - Which you should be feeding with rumour and generalisation. BOfH, 2002 "Episode" 10
Post #66,102 by pwhysall 12/2/02 12:14:20 PM Reply	Also... ...we should be able to see how many people a given user is shunning. So that we can identify the miserable, antisocial gits among us :) Peter [link\|http://www.debian.org\|Shill For Hire] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Blog]
Post #66,142 by CRConrad 12/2/02 1:52:51 PM Reply	No need for that, is there really? You already KNOW I'd be at the top of that list, right? :-) More seriously, why not the other way around: To see how many people are shunning a given user? Not that one would have to follow in lock-step with the majority -- who really believes too many of us would do that? -- but as a quick'n'dirty way of getting a hint on who might not be worth wasting your time on; for newbies, or [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/user?username=Addison\|returning regulars] who've been away for a while, etc. Christian R. Conrad Mechanisation As our souls are slowly stolen The wheels of progress keep steamrolling Mechanisation melts our minds To drive the furnace that drives us blind. -- [link\|http://www.vergenet.net/~conrad/poetry/mechanisation.html\|© Conrad Parker, 1993]

Call for consensus on Norm's misuse of the forums - (admin) - (126) - Dec. 1, 2002, 06:42:06 PM EST

What I would suggest - (boxley) - (5) - Dec. 1, 2002, 07:20:17 PM EST

That's not a bad idea... - (admin) - (3) - Dec. 1, 2002, 07:29:09 PM EST

Present accounts - (Ashton) - (1) - Dec. 1, 2002, 07:53:20 PM EST

I agree re: erring on the side of tolerance... - (admin) - Dec. 1, 2002, 08:11:51 PM EST

let the existing accounts ride, horse barn door etc -NT - (boxley) - Dec. 1, 2002, 08:10:37 PM EST

Was just going to suggest that :) -NT - (deSitter) - Dec. 2, 2002, 11:09:52 AM EST

Yeah, well, he is kind of a pain in the butt . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (6) - Dec. 1, 2002, 07:42:56 PM EST

Thats 2.. - (bepatient) - (4) - Dec. 1, 2002, 07:44:26 PM EST

The hardest thing. - (static) - (1) - Dec. 1, 2002, 07:49:22 PM EST

That might be an upside, for us in the US.. - (Ashton) - Dec. 1, 2002, 07:59:19 PM EST

make it 3 - (Steve Lowe) - Dec. 1, 2002, 08:01:30 PM EST

Make it 3... - (jb4) - Dec. 2, 2002, 09:56:50 AM EST

Re: reading any particular thread is entirely optional. - (admin) - Dec. 1, 2002, 08:10:44 PM EST

Scrap da stupid no-ban rule (wherever ya pulled it out from) - (CRConrad) - (8) - Dec. 1, 2002, 08:28:52 PM EST

Last time I banned someone - (admin) - (7) - Dec. 1, 2002, 09:04:31 PM EST

As the regular in question... - (ben_tilly) - (6) - Dec. 1, 2002, 10:10:12 PM EST

yahbut... - (folkert) - (1) - Dec. 1, 2002, 10:21:02 PM EST

Sounds pretty complex. - (Ashton) - Dec. 1, 2002, 10:26:29 PM EST

Ravening hordes don't count as 'bans' - (Ashton) - (3) - Dec. 1, 2002, 10:22:00 PM EST

Considering how come those "ravening hordes"(*)... - (CRConrad) - (2) - Dec. 2, 2002, 04:32:13 AM EST

Ummmm - (Ashton) - Dec. 2, 2002, 05:28:34 AM EST

One "attack" was staged, another real -NT - (admin) - Dec. 2, 2002, 08:36:18 AM EST

Relationships and/or trusts with defaults being... - (folkert) - (4) - Dec. 1, 2002, 09:40:29 PM EST

Keep It Simple, um... Sir? :P - (tseliot) - (3) - Dec. 2, 2002, 10:29:38 AM EST

Arrrgggh - from thot --> consense. Cannot live w/ this shame - (Ashton) - (2) - Dec. 2, 2002, 02:30:54 PM EST

Sorry, trying to enrich not dismantle - (tseliot) - (1) - Dec. 2, 2002, 03:10:41 PM EST

Oooohhh.. snidery - (Ashton) - Dec. 2, 2002, 03:28:53 PM EST

Couple thoughts (fixed spelling of t-word) - (tuberculosis) - (8) - Dec. 2, 2002, 06:09:07 AM EST

Aieeeeeeee! (new thread) - (pwhysall) - Dec. 2, 2002, 03:27:46 AM EST

I'm leaning towards killfiles. - (admin) - (6) - Dec. 2, 2002, 08:37:30 AM EST

I really think its the best - (tuberculosis) - (5) - Dec. 2, 2002, 10:10:51 AM EST

Oooers! - (Yendor) - Dec. 2, 2002, 10:17:22 AM EST

New Users section added to bottom of Active Users page -NT - (admin) - (3) - Dec. 2, 2002, 11:05:59 AM EST

We are not worthy - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Dec. 2, 2002, 01:02:31 PM EST

Speak for yourself; *I* sure am! :-) - (CRConrad) - Dec. 2, 2002, 01:26:11 PM EST

The [B][Sp]ork God has done YAM\ufffd! - (folkert) - Dec. 2, 2002, 02:57:13 PM EST

Re: Call for consensus on Norm's misuse of the forums - (Yendor) - Dec. 2, 2002, 04:26:06 AM EST

I'm still for ignoring his trolls. - (hnick) - (3) - Dec. 2, 2002, 07:06:40 AM EST

Well, *I* NEVER... - (folkert) - (2) - Dec. 2, 2002, 09:07:36 AM EST

The Bryce-ization of IWT continues... - (Yendor) - (1) - Dec. 2, 2002, 09:25:37 AM EST

Well... in my Defense... - (folkert) - Dec. 2, 2002, 09:31:23 AM EST

Twit filter - (drewk) - Dec. 2, 2002, 09:39:39 AM EST

Resist the urge to reply - (Silverlock) - Dec. 2, 2002, 10:04:08 AM EST

After reading all posts... - (Arkadiy) - (24) - Dec. 2, 2002, 11:36:19 AM EST

One problem with that: - (inthane-chan) - (17) - Dec. 2, 2002, 11:48:09 AM EST

Not sure what you mean by crossbar but - (tseliot) - (16) - Dec. 2, 2002, 11:51:53 AM EST

Only filled on demand. - (admin) - (15) - Dec. 2, 2002, 11:54:35 AM EST

yabut - (tseliot) - (4) - Dec. 2, 2002, 11:58:45 AM EST

Re: yabut - (admin) - (3) - Dec. 2, 2002, 12:00:14 PM EST

*snort* sounds like we need a requirements doc. - (tseliot) - Dec. 2, 2002, 12:05:13 PM EST

Also... - (pwhysall) - (1) - Dec. 2, 2002, 12:14:20 PM EST

No need for that, is there really? - (CRConrad) - Dec. 2, 2002, 01:52:51 PM EST

Yes.... THAT's it... - (folkert) - (9) - Dec. 2, 2002, 12:03:44 PM EST

Hey.. - (Steve Lowe) - Dec. 2, 2002, 12:08:12 PM EST

Time and the Other - (tseliot) - (7) - Dec. 2, 2002, 12:13:30 PM EST

I don't like it anymore - (folkert) - (6) - Dec. 2, 2002, 12:33:57 PM EST

Yes, yes I would have. - (tseliot) - (4) - Dec. 2, 2002, 12:54:15 PM EST

<SIGH> ... That old nonsense concept again. :-( - (CRConrad) - (1) - Dec. 2, 2002, 02:01:00 PM EST

Hey, that's *my* point! :D - (tseliot) - Dec. 2, 2002, 02:27:10 PM EST

Fine - so you get a sliding lever: "From Now --> Eternity" - (Ashton) - (1) - Dec. 2, 2002, 02:53:39 PM EST

Thanks. That's exactly what I wanted. - (tseliot) - Dec. 2, 2002, 03:04:29 PM EST

that's why I want him shown locked - (tuberculosis) - Dec. 2, 2002, 01:07:31 PM EST

Interesting... - (admin) - (5) - Dec. 2, 2002, 11:50:07 AM EST

My preference - (drewk) - (3) - Dec. 2, 2002, 11:54:47 AM EST

ZIWT Artists! - (pwhysall) - (1) - Dec. 2, 2002, 11:59:46 AM EST

Quick search presents: - (folkert) - Dec. 2, 2002, 12:25:07 PM EST

Believe this is the best way - (tseliot) - Dec. 2, 2002, 12:03:49 PM EST

Indeed - (Arkadiy) - Dec. 2, 2002, 02:59:21 PM EST

Vote for ignoring. - (inthane-chan) - (12) - Dec. 2, 2002, 12:25:21 PM EST

Re: Vote for ignoring. - (admin) - (11) - Dec. 2, 2002, 12:29:04 PM EST

I concur. - (inthane-chan) - Dec. 2, 2002, 12:34:00 PM EST

Well, isn't that the most bass-ackwards idea I ever saw... - (CRConrad) - (8) - Dec. 2, 2002, 02:10:15 PM EST

When you put it That way.. - (Ashton) - (7) - Dec. 2, 2002, 03:23:24 PM EST

Why should Scott have to do ANY work? - (Silverlock) - (6) - Dec. 2, 2002, 03:33:53 PM EST

That is EXACTLY RIGHT! -NT - (jb4) - Dec. 2, 2002, 06:25:56 PM EST

Amen. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Dec. 2, 2002, 09:22:45 PM EST

That's a Bingo! -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - Dec. 2, 2002, 09:25:40 PM EST

10-4 good buddy! -NT - (bepatient) - Dec. 2, 2002, 10:43:40 PM EST

It just takes one to bite.. er Greg? ummm never mind. - (Ashton) - (1) - Dec. 3, 2002, 04:32:28 AM EST

Yeah...right...er, what he said... - (jb4) - Dec. 3, 2002, 10:06:59 AM EST

I did... and have had... - (folkert) - Dec. 2, 2002, 03:24:13 PM EST

Ignore him/them -NT - (altmann) - Dec. 2, 2002, 04:20:51 PM EST

Bidirectional twit "cease to exist" proposal - (kmself) - (12) - Dec. 2, 2002, 06:17:11 PM EST

Re: Bidirectional twit "cease to exist" proposal - (admin) - Dec. 2, 2002, 06:23:28 PM EST

Have to oppose on philosophical grounds. - (Ashton) - (10) - Dec. 3, 2002, 04:56:00 AM EST

Concur. -NT - (pwhysall) - Dec. 3, 2002, 07:47:29 AM EST

Concur as well. - (inthane-chan) - (8) - Dec. 3, 2002, 11:18:36 AM EST

So don't filter anyone. -NT - (Yendor) - (7) - Dec. 3, 2002, 11:23:49 AM EST

It's about having the tool availible. - (inthane-chan) - (6) - Dec. 3, 2002, 11:28:44 AM EST

What if there were several options - (admin) - (3) - Dec. 3, 2002, 11:34:06 AM EST

Then - - - - (Ashton) - (2) - Dec. 3, 2002, 07:14:08 PM EST

Only for the person doing the filtering - (admin) - (1) - Dec. 3, 2002, 07:17:08 PM EST

Awomen to that. -NT - (Ashton) - Dec. 3, 2002, 08:08:35 PM EST

Yes, I want it available. - (n3jja) - (1) - Dec. 3, 2002, 11:35:19 AM EST

ObAOLMeToo - (Yendor) - Dec. 3, 2002, 12:17:33 PM EST

Ignore, but... - (jbrabeck) - (1) - Dec. 2, 2002, 06:34:21 PM EST

Lookey here: - (folkert) - Dec. 2, 2002, 06:39:40 PM EST

OKAY, OKAY, OKAY....Nuff about the consensus - (folkert) - (23) - Dec. 2, 2002, 09:46:26 PM EST

Sorry, but I still want a twit filter of some sort. - (n3jja) - (22) - Dec. 2, 2002, 10:04:57 PM EST

Agreed - (Yendor) - (21) - Dec. 3, 2002, 03:28:19 AM EST

Same principle as a twit filter. - (n3jja) - (20) - Dec. 3, 2002, 07:36:15 AM EST

So do it yourself. - (Yendor) - (13) - Dec. 3, 2002, 07:56:51 AM EST

No need to add a space - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Dec. 3, 2002, 07:47:58 AM EST

Good call - (Yendor) - Dec. 3, 2002, 07:52:29 AM EST

Workaround for the "Mark All Forums Read" problem: - (CRConrad) - (10) - Dec. 3, 2002, 03:43:21 PM EST

Good thought; beat ya to it. - (Yendor) - (9) - Dec. 4, 2002, 03:55:10 AM EST

As SilverDon said, I have a User Page?!? - (CRConrad) - (8) - Dec. 4, 2002, 04:43:44 AM EST

IIRC... - (bepatient) - (6) - Dec. 4, 2002, 04:53:19 AM EST

Nope... - (Yendor) - (5) - Dec. 4, 2002, 06:26:58 AM EST

user page or preference settings page? - (bepatient) - (3) - Dec. 4, 2002, 06:31:18 AM EST

Neither... - (Yendor) - Dec. 4, 2002, 06:52:04 AM EST

You talking ZIW here, BeeP? We're talking TWikiIWeThey... -NT - (CRConrad) - (1) - Dec. 4, 2002, 06:54:27 AM EST

Finally figured it out -NT - (bepatient) - Dec. 4, 2002, 06:55:40 AM EST

Yeah, I' edited it out, NOW - but it sure would have been... - (CRConrad) - Dec. 4, 2002, 06:52:26 AM EST

On spam harvesting (new thread) - (pwhysall) - Dec. 4, 2002, 07:27:48 AM EST

As long as you don't click "mark all read"... - (ben_tilly) - (5) - Dec. 3, 2002, 07:45:08 AM EST

23 seconds! -NT - (Yendor) - (4) - Dec. 3, 2002, 07:46:28 AM EST

Yabut, better answer :-P - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Dec. 3, 2002, 07:49:30 AM EST

Nein... - (Yendor) - (2) - Dec. 3, 2002, 07:54:46 AM EST

oops - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Dec. 3, 2002, 08:18:30 AM EST

Agreed - (Yendor) - Dec. 3, 2002, 08:23:03 AM EST

Re: Call for consensus on Norm's misuse of the forums - (deSitter) - (2) - Dec. 2, 2002, 11:43:28 PM EST

Twit filters are a generic item... - (Yendor) - (1) - Dec. 3, 2002, 03:34:08 AM EST

Not the first abuse of forums - (ChrisR) - Dec. 3, 2002, 10:33:09 AM EST

Purgatory? - (Another Scott) - (1) - Dec. 3, 2002, 12:27:27 AM EST

Re: Purgatory? - (Yendor) - Dec. 3, 2002, 03:39:54 AM EST

iwethey.org

Dude...
459 ms