There's still a level at which a throttle makes sense
There are patterns of use which simply aren't typical, or possible, from human participants. Heuristic throttling is a well established (and frequently rediscovered) failsoft mechanism.
\r\n\r\n
The other side is the idiot's idiot problem: once you've ignored the idiot, you're stuck with all the people who can't manage to ignore the idiot. Again, throttles address that issue.
--\r\n
Karsten M. Self [link|mailto:kmself@ix.netcom.com|kmself@ix.netcom.com]\r\n
[link|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/]\r\n
What part of "gestalt" don't you understand?\r\n
[link|http://twiki.iwethey.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/|TWikIWETHEY] -- an experiment in collective intelligence. Stupidity. Whatever.\r\n
\r\n
Keep software free. Oppose the CBDTPA. Kill S.2048 dead.\r\n[link|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html]\r\n