IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New That new LASER system, if it indeed works,
Will nail everything from ballistic missiles on down.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
New Still won't stop a freight container, tho...
That's the big problem as I see it - defense, ultimately, is a failed excercise, especially as our ability to project energy in an offensive manner continues to grow exponentially faster than our ability to shield against that energy. There's always a way to deliver a nuke, and once you've got it delivered, well...
End of world rescheduled for day after tomorrow. Something should probably be done. Please advise.
New Yep.
Try telling Israel they don't need air defenses though... :-)
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
New And you'll distinguish between the
nuke packing Cessna and the General Aviation "out for fun" family Cessna how again?

You could wait until the nuke goes off...er...but that might be too late.

You could outlaw GA though...that would be interesting.

(And yes, there is the freighter above.)

Don't get me wrong. I like SDI research. We should continue it. It should be installed on naval warships and other military places.

I'm just worried that people are going to spend billions a defense system that can and will be circumvented.
Expand Edited by Simon_Jester Nov. 11, 2002, 12:18:23 PM EST
New Everything can be circumvented.
Armor fell to the longbow, castles to the cannon, and so on.

There are plenty of things the laser system shown could protect against, however. Use the right tool for the job. Just because there are other jobs as well doesn't invalidate the need for the laser's job.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
New No defense is perfect.
You also left out vehicular delivery. Drive it up from Mexico.

Don't get me wrong. I like SDI research. We should continue it. It should be installed on naval warships and other military places.
Good usage.

I'm just worried that people are going to spend billions a defense system that can and will be circumvented.
Yes, we will. And we will be surprised when our defenses fail to protect our cities.

Again, people should read about attack trees from Bruce Schneier.

Our COUNTRY (the land, the cities, the roads, etc) will NOT be attacked via ICBM's.

The ICBM scenario is from the Cold War with Russia.

We will be spending TRILLIONS of dollars to defend against an attack that DOES NOT EXIST ANYMORE.

It would be a better DEFENSE to take some of that money and help Russia.

But then, I've always viewed the situation slightly differently than most people. Remember the Marshall Plan.
     Army laser shoots down supersonic ballistic projectile - (marlowe) - (41)
         MrEd: While Wilbur was Away - (deSitter)
         How much are you willing to pay for it? - (jake123) - (39)
             Billions for defense, not one cent for tribute. - (marlowe) - (38)
                 Point of inquiry - (Ashton) - (2)
                     Brevity is the soul of wit. - (marlowe) - (1)
                         Witless cant __!= 'brevity'__ == pap. -NT - (Ashton)
                 I didn't ask you that. - (jake123) - (34)
                     lets return the favor I say we pay 1/2 - (boxley) - (9)
                         Hehehe... - (jake123) - (8)
                             I was there from 73 to 76 off and on - (boxley) - (7)
                                 Re: I was there from 73 to 76 off and on - (jake123) - (6)
                                     spent 2 weeks in my youth doing algonquin park - (boxley) - (5)
                                         National Geographic - (jake123) - (4)
                                             walking is for idiots (I know) - (boxley)
                                             That sounds a lot like - (Ashton) - (2)
                                                 This walk in a trice? Not too sure about that... - (jake123) - (1)
                                                     Heh.. see your point.__ Also Canada (parts in winter) - (Ashton)
                     I'm willing to pay whatever it takes. - (marlowe) - (23)
                         In short, you can't answer the question. - (jake123) - (17)
                             It's worse than that... - (Simon_Jester) - (4)
                                 That's exactly the point I was trying to make to him. -NT - (jake123) - (3)
                                     Which is, of course - the game plan of every - (Ashton)
                                     Which is, of course,... - (jb4) - (1)
                                         I just want to see if he will do otherwise. - (jake123)
                             Cost benefit analysis? Let's see yours. - (marlowe) - (11)
                                 No you are not. - (Brandioch)
                                 Sure. - (jake123)
                                 I'd first like to see.... - (Simon_Jester) - (8)
                                     neat technology without star wars there wouldnt be - (boxley) - (1)
                                         True...and I don't mind spending money on research - (Simon_Jester)
                                     That new LASER system, if it indeed works, - (admin) - (5)
                                         Still won't stop a freight container, tho... - (inthane-chan) - (1)
                                             Yep. - (admin)
                                         And you'll distinguish between the - (Simon_Jester) - (2)
                                             Everything can be circumvented. - (admin)
                                             No defense is perfect. - (Brandioch)
                         Whatever it takes, eh? - (Silverlock) - (4)
                             The armed forces are sufficiently appreciative... - (marlowe) - (3)
                                 What I'm willing to do - (Silverlock) - (2)
                                     Ah There's SL - (deSitter) - (1)
                                         Nah, just bugsh*t crazy with a ton of work -NT - (Silverlock)

I have neither space nor cash nor latitude to adorn my house with any more things with CPUs in them.
113 ms