Re: Win2k VPN configuration?

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #61,859 by pwhysall 11/8/02 11:06:56 AM Reply	Re: Win2k VPN configuration? If there is any NAT in the equation anywhere along the route you want to establish the IPSec connection on, then you cannot use IPSec alone to establish the VPN. You're probably better off using IPSec over something like PPTP or L2TP, NAT notwithstanding. Peter [link\|http://www.debian.org\|Shill For Hire] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Blog]
Post #61,895 by dlevitt 11/8/02 3:00:27 PM Reply	Re: Win2k VPN configuration? Thought it might be somthing involving NAT - even the ISP involved [Cablevision] uses the 10.0.0.0 net internally. Time to stock up on smoke, mirrors and sacrifical chickens [KFC, Popeye's or Boston market?].
Post #61,900 by wharris2 11/8/02 3:11:10 PM Reply	Smoke, mirrors, and sacrificial chicken wings Preferably at Hooters.
Post #61,930 by pwhysall 11/8/02 8:12:48 PM Reply	Rationale: IPSec depends on the IP header on the packet being unchanged. NAT does change these, and so IPSec breaks. Peter [link\|http://www.debian.org\|Shill For Hire] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Blog]

Win2k VPN configuration? - (dlevitt) - (5) - Nov. 8, 2002, 10:22:48 AM EST

Re: Win2k VPN configuration? - (pwhysall) - (3) - Nov. 8, 2002, 11:06:56 AM EST

Re: Win2k VPN configuration? - (dlevitt) - (2) - Nov. 8, 2002, 03:00:27 PM EST

Smoke, mirrors, and sacrificial chicken wings - (wharris2) - Nov. 8, 2002, 03:11:10 PM EST

Rationale: - (pwhysall) - Nov. 8, 2002, 08:12:48 PM EST

you need 2 static public IP addresses for VPN - (boxley) - Nov. 11, 2002, 09:05:25 AM EST

Any movie with Tim Curry as The Lord of Darkness can't be all bad.
51 ms