Huh?
IMMEDIATELY decided to claim that such was YOUR position all along.
AND that you had advocated a military invasion as a "last resort".
Strangely enough, NONE of your posts could be found or linked to support your claim.
Although a long history of your advocating invasion could be found.
YOU were the one decrying the "ivory tower intellectuals" UNTIL it was shown that you were one of them and I was the one with real world experience.
And why is it those on the right get to say "I told you so" while those on the Left struggle to divert attention to something, anything, but the manifest failures of their policies?Ummm, wasn't it the current regime that CUT anti-terrorism funding and would NOT deploy the drones that proved so useful during Clinton's administration?
Isn't it Bush who has trouble with UN reports NOT saying what he says they say?
But no, you've trumped me! You simply go into denial about how well things are going for me and those who think like me, and how badly things are going for your side!We're running a deficit that is LARGER than any while Clinton was in office.
Our troops are being shot at in "friendly" countries over there.
Our country is going BROKE to finance a war against countries that pose no threats to us.
Okay, this is another one of those "prediction" things you don't like from me.
The USofA will NOT recover from this "recession" quickly.
Because things are going good for YOU does NOT mean that they are going good for the COUNTRY.
You pounce like a starved hound on any vague hint that, for instance, some inveterate liars say bin Laden is still alive, but minimize or ignore the great progess we've made so far.What progress? The experts say that it is harder NOW to catch any operatives than it was before.
Our troops are being shot at. Terrorist bombing attacks are everywhere. We even have a sniper in the US. This is "progress"? Perhaps you can tell me what the casualty count was during the Clinton years?
But denial is no escape. You're still miserable, because you know deep down that you're wrong.Seems to me that the FACTS support my position.
So much so that I'm able to PREDICT what will happen.
If that is "wrong", then how can it be so accurate?
