0.1cm is a bit tight

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #57,906 by ChrisR 10/19/02 11:12:12 PM 10/19/02 11:15:36 PM Reply	0.1cm is a bit tight From looking at the source, it looks like you're setting it properly - just needs to be 0.5cm. LI doesn't need the same setting though.\r\n\r\n \r\nUL {\r\n MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5cm; LIST-STYLE-TYPE: disc\r\n}\r\nOL {\r\n MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5cm\r\n}\r\nLI {\r\n MARGIN-LEFT: 0.1cm\r\n}\r\n Edited by ChrisR Oct. 19, 2002, 11:15:36 PM EDT Expand All History
Post #57,907 by admin 10/19/02 11:17:40 PM Reply	I tried .5 cm, it looked huge. But, set that way now anyway. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #57,914 by kmself 10/19/02 11:30:06 PM Reply	Not sure if you've changed anything, but looks better I'd noted unordered list indents were largish, seem to be better now. Looks a lot like the old IWE forums in some ways. --\r\nKarsten M. Self [link\|mailto:kmself@ix.netcom.com\|kmself@ix.netcom.com]\r\n[link\|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/\|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/]\r\nWhat part of "gestalt" don't you understand?\r\n[link\|http://twiki.iwethey.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/\|TWikIWETHEY] -- an experiment in collective intelligence. Stupidity. Whatever.\r\n\r\n Keep software free. Oppose the CBDTPA. Kill S.2048 dead.\r\n[link\|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html\|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html]\r\n
Post #57,916 by ChrisR 10/19/02 11:34:23 PM Reply	Whoops - Browser dependency? The way it is now, it looks fine in IE and Opera. But Mozilla (1.1) actually seems to get worse (I tried a -0.5cm to get about the same spacing as in the others). I'd speculate that mozilla is referenced at 0.0cm default margin, whereas IE and Opera are defaulted to 1.0cm.\r\n

New User Pref: Thread Indentation Format - (admin) - (13) - Oct. 19, 2002, 12:09:08 AM EDT

I'm trying unordered lists... - (ChrisR) - (8) - Oct. 19, 2002, 12:41:50 AM EDT

Fixed. -NT - (admin) - (7) - Oct. 19, 2002, 08:01:30 AM EDT

Thanks. - (ChrisR) - (6) - Oct. 19, 2002, 12:09:37 PM EDT

Didn't seem to do much at all. - (admin) - Oct. 19, 2002, 10:11:06 PM EDT

I think it's probably the table stuff it's wrapped in. - (admin) - (4) - Oct. 19, 2002, 10:13:22 PM EDT

0.1cm is a bit tight - (ChrisR) - (3) - Oct. 19, 2002, 11:15:36 PM EDT

I tried .5 cm, it looked huge. - (admin) - (2) - Oct. 19, 2002, 11:17:40 PM EDT

Not sure if you've changed anything, but looks better - (kmself) - Oct. 19, 2002, 11:30:06 PM EDT

Whoops - Browser dependency? - (ChrisR) - Oct. 19, 2002, 11:34:23 PM EDT

Hmmm.... - (folkert) - (3) - Oct. 19, 2002, 02:18:24 PM EDT

Define "don't work" - (admin) - (2) - Oct. 19, 2002, 10:09:06 PM EDT

As in the opposite of "Do work" - (folkert) - (1) - Oct. 19, 2002, 11:18:49 PM EDT

Not intentionally. - (admin) - Oct. 19, 2002, 11:20:31 PM EDT

iwethey.org

For Wade, it is to lag.
106 ms