Post #57,774
10/19/02 12:41:50 AM
|
I'm trying unordered lists...
...at least for a while. My preference would be to get rid of the spacer image (blank.gif) for the html list views - tends to introduce too much white space between the disc and the message titles. Yes, I know this will skew the text alignment on the message titles, but the discs on the nested lists tends to serve that purpose already - and the default indentation is a lot more.\r\n\r\n
|
Post #57,801
10/19/02 8:01:30 AM
|
Fixed.
Regards,
-scott anderson
"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
|
Post #57,817
10/19/02 12:09:37 PM
|
Thanks.
As long as you're taking requests.... :-) How about setting the margin so that the indentation on the unordered lists is less severe. Either setting the style for ul or as a class. Something like: \nUL {\n LIST-STYLE-TYPE: disc;\n MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5cm;\n}\n
|
Post #57,895
10/19/02 10:11:06 PM
|
Didn't seem to do much at all.
Where are the style options for UL/OL defined? I haven't had any luck finding them.
Regards,
-scott anderson
"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
|
Post #57,896
10/19/02 10:13:22 PM
|
I think it's probably the table stuff it's wrapped in.
I'll fix it tomorrow probably.
Regards,
-scott anderson
"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
|
Post #57,906
10/19/02 11:12:12 PM
10/19/02 11:15:36 PM
|
0.1cm is a bit tight
From looking at the source, it looks like you're setting it properly - just needs to be 0.5cm. LI doesn't need the same setting though.\r\n\r\n \r\nUL {\r\n MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5cm; LIST-STYLE-TYPE: disc\r\n}\r\nOL {\r\n MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5cm\r\n}\r\nLI {\r\n MARGIN-LEFT: 0.1cm\r\n}\r\n
Edited by ChrisR
Oct. 19, 2002, 11:15:36 PM EDT
|
Post #57,907
10/19/02 11:17:40 PM
|
I tried .5 cm, it looked huge.
But, set that way now anyway.
Regards,
-scott anderson
"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
|
Post #57,914
10/19/02 11:30:06 PM
|
Not sure if you've changed anything, but looks better
I'd noted unordered list indents were largish, seem to be better now. Looks a lot like the old IWE forums in some ways.
--\r\nKarsten M. Self [link|mailto:kmself@ix.netcom.com|kmself@ix.netcom.com]\r\n[link|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/]\r\nWhat part of "gestalt" don't you understand?\r\n[link|http://twiki.iwethey.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/|TWikIWETHEY] -- an experiment in collective intelligence. Stupidity. Whatever.\r\n\r\n Keep software free. Oppose the CBDTPA. Kill S.2048 dead.\r\n[link|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html]\r\n
|
Post #57,916
10/19/02 11:34:23 PM
|
Whoops - Browser dependency?
The way it is now, it looks fine in IE and Opera. But Mozilla (1.1) actually seems to get worse (I tried a -0.5cm to get about the same spacing as in the others). I'd speculate that mozilla is referenced at 0.0cm default margin, whereas IE and Opera are defaulted to 1.0cm.\r\n
|
