Post #56,573
10/13/02 9:44:37 PM
|
Yes it is, but they don't do "targets of opportunity".
At least, they haven't before.
They plan for months or years to take out a target.
They have people willing to give their lives to deliver the bomb.
I'm not seeing that here.
Yes, it is a site that is the opposite of just about everythng al Queda believes in.
But they've had more opportunities to bomb nightclubs in the past and they've never done so.
|
Post #56,574
10/13/02 9:48:36 PM
|
Wasnt the German nightclub an one of theirs?
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]
"Therefore, by objective standards, the leading managers of the U.S. economy...are collectively, clinically insane." Lyndon LaRouche
|
Post #56,578
10/13/02 10:31:26 PM
10/14/02 6:14:11 AM
|
Re: Not that I ever read anywhere ...
In questioning the group responsible for this attack, I believe it fair game to consider some covert ops 'group' could be considered responsible for these reasons ...
1) The nature of this attack - not typical Al Qaeda by any measure 2) The incredible political timing of the attack in regard to Australian Iraq politics in support of Bush 3) The fact that this attack will harm Indonesia a lot more than Australia - Indonesia had been disputing the US ambassador in regard to his pressure than Indonesia harboured terrorist elements. The Indonesians kept saying that there was no credible Al Qaeda threat within the country - now the Indonesians are on the back foot. 4) The economic harm to Indonesia and Bali in the short to medium term will be devestating. It may even prove crippling if the world perceives that the 'terror' threat hasn't gone away.
But again the point I 1st made (and is still there) was that it could either be Muslims from Java or some covert op people intent on redirecting public opinion. If it were Muslims from Java I doubt it was an approved Al Qaeda attack. I think people are beginning to forget what Al Qaeda is/was about.
It is clear that the target was more than just Aussies as there were Brits , Kiwis, Chinese etc: etc: that were killed there. Bill, you usually offer good insights when you think, can you give an analysis of how this attack could hurt Australia. Being from Australia and knowing this region well, I just can't come up with any rationale as to how this attack hurts Australia politically or financially.
This bombing has achieved quite a bit but mostly in the opposite direction to what many people perceive. The only real losers are Indonesia, the Balinese & the poor tourists caught up in the middle. The Muslims in Indonesia look like losing from this as well as will ay group than can be *labelled* as Muslim extremists. Australia loses nothing politically & financially apart from the citizens & wearing the agony of the losses. I will leave it to the reader to consider who might gain greatly or greatest, from this incident. Had this attack occured in Australia, I might have quite a different view - embroiling Indonesia in the terror just does not gain these groups one iota of benefit.
Cheers
Doug
#added point 4 & expanded last para
Edited by dmarker2
Oct. 14, 2002, 06:02:56 AM EDT
Edited by dmarker2
Oct. 14, 2002, 06:14:11 AM EDT
|
Post #56,647
10/14/02 11:53:07 AM
|
On covert ops in general.
I used to think that stuff like that Just Didn't Happen. And if it did, it would come out in the public, 'cause you just can't keep a secret.
In my last stint at Microsoft, my roommate was an ex-special forces guy from the Gulf War. He always had this far-off look, like he was remembering something that caused him a lot of pain, and he would sometimes start crying for no obvious reason. When Sept 11 happened, he really started freaking out, and made some cryptic comments about some kind of covert action he was in during the Gulf War - and even dropped some hints it was U.S. on Allies attack to justify certain actions that were taken.
When his emotions calmed down, he clammed up, and refused to talk any more about it. I didn't push either...
End of world rescheduled for day after tomorrow. Something should probably be done. Please advise.
|
Post #56,653
10/14/02 12:23:46 PM
|
Risk / benefit
Personally, I don't think this bombing would pass a risk / benefit analysis for a covert operation.
Of course, such things have been done, and not just by the U.S.. The British government had the hold of the Lusitania (an armed and armored cruiser disguised as a passenger ship) filled with munitions, had all American passengers transfered to that ship, used political pressure to hold up publication of a full page warning by the German Government, and ordered the captain of the Lusitania to change course to pass directly in front of a known Uboat to be torpedoed, with great loss of American lives.
Evidence of the course change messages was erased (except at one relay station that erased the message text but left recorded the times, dates and Lusitania destination). The captain was put on trial for neglegence, but the judge eventually realized it was a fix and acquited him. That judge was banished from the bench by the British Crown.
The British government, presented with the evidence, officially admitted most details of the operation back in the '70s.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
|
Post #56,767
10/14/02 7:07:34 PM
|
Risk / benefit analysis assumes intelligent direction
The fact that it doesn't make sense rules out neither Al-Quaida nor, umm, that one guy in the funny shaped room.
---- Whatever
|
Post #56,781
10/14/02 8:27:36 PM
|
Simple, intelligent aim: sow chaos. It worked. Works.
|
Post #56,759
10/14/02 6:39:18 PM
|
Clarification?
Which nightclub?
|
Post #56,577
10/13/02 10:17:02 PM
|
Look at it from another angle.
Indonesia has a very well developed home grown bunch of Islamic radicals that hate everyone just as much as Osama does (did?). There was, if I recall correctly, considerable griping about a year ago due to Osama and company stealing the spotlight and messing in local Indonesioan affairs.
I see absolutely no conflict with this job NOT being related to Al Queda, but being an Islamic Jihad operation.
We should have TTC signing in pretty soon to tell us how much we all deserved this. Perhaps he will fill in some of the details.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
|
Post #56,580
10/13/02 10:45:44 PM
|
Au contraire.
The [link|http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/middle_east/july-dec97/egypt_11-17.html|Luxor Egypt] terrorist attack was similar in targeting. [link|http://www.adl.org/terrorism_america/bin_l.asp|Osama...] gradually became more and more affiliated with Egyptian Islamic extremist groups, such as Egyptian Islamic Jihad. Osama's right hand man, and perhaps the man in charge now, is Ayman al-Zawahiri of Egypt's Islamic Jihad. You may recall the Islamic Jihad wanted to make Egypt a religious state. And, Indonesia as we know has a Jemaah Islamiah, faction, linked to Al Queda, with similar goals. Also the Abu Sayyaf guerrillas in the Philippines. Al Queda has a larger scope and has a menu of things they can do. Check your [link|http://www.heraldnet.com/Stories/02/10/10/15929850.cfm|local paper].
Alex
"In America, anybody can be president. That's one of the risks you take." -- Adlai Stevenson (1900-1965)
|
Post #56,600
10/14/02 4:05:44 AM
|
Re: No, those attacks were aimed at their own govt
These islamic extremists killed Sadat & have tried to kill Mubarak (the current PM). They ere at that time happy to bring down their own county's economy.
It is not impossible that such elements are emerging in Indonesia but to give that line credit is to ignore the more obvious ones.
Cheers
Doug
|
Post #56,583
10/13/02 11:18:40 PM
10/13/02 11:21:52 PM
|
One more tidbit.
When Australian troops were in East Timor, which is predominately Christian, in support of that country's transition to independence from Indonesia, Osama bin Laden, the Qaeda leader, publicly accused Australia of being on a crusade to break up Muslim Indonesia. On second page of [link|http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/14/international/14BOMB.html?pagewanted=2|NY Times piece]. (iwethey:iwethey)
Alex
"In America, anybody can be president. That's one of the risks you take." -- Adlai Stevenson (1900-1965)
Edited by a6l6e6x
Oct. 13, 2002, 11:21:52 PM EDT
|
Post #56,601
10/14/02 4:59:07 AM
10/14/02 6:45:46 AM
|
Re: Guess what - Osama was right - Oz was ...
stepping in at US behest to counter the growing power of Muslim elements in Indonesia.
The facts are ...
After end 2nd world war in a joint military meeting of key nations controlling the Pacific it was agreed that countries that couls become independant were & were to include:- Indonesia, Vietnam, Burma, Thailand, Malaysia/Singapore, Australia, NZ, (etc:), and also eventually Figi, Samoa, Tonga & Papua-New Guinea could become independant, *but* no other nation would be allowed to break their colonial bonds unless part of the approved nations (French Polynesia is a case in point - no independance & backed by all Pacific power nations).
When Portugese pulled out of Timor after a leftist coup in the homeland, they created a problem. The problem was that leftwing elements from Portugal had gained influence in the Fretlin who were the leading party in Timor. Apodeti, the pro Indonesian group had next to none. [link|http://www.defence.gov.au/army/asnce/history.htm|Short history of East Timor] (this document is very sobering reading).
The US gave Indonesia's Sukarno the green light and the weapons for them to secretly invade East Timor to put down the Fretlin takeover. Australia was told to pull its head in and shut up (at the time there was a new Labour (left wing) govt in power in Australia & Gough Whitlam was PM - he did exactly as he was told 'shut-up' & he also shut up the mouths of the union movement who were incensed by the Indonesian actions - Sukarno invaded but the world was told that there was no invasion but that loyal Indonesian elemnts (APODETI & UDT) were fighting the Fretlin.
Now in the 2000s we have US telling Australia to put heat on Indonesia to allow Timor to have a referendum on independance (approx 1/3 of Timorese population had been slaughtered between 1970s & 1990s by Indonesian army).
US had discovered that East Timor had large oil reserves (go use google to check) and that by promoting independance for Timor, it would fragment Indonesia's growing Islamic militancy. Bin Laden followers had been sponsoring the attacks on Christians in Ambon & got behind the growing war (going on since the 1960s)in Aceh province ([link|http://www.geocities.com/aroki.geo/0208/INA-aceh0207.html|Ache - Indonesia's civil war]
The Indonesian's were royally pissed off at the about face from Australia& US over Timor, but they had handled the situation so badly (tried to kill/export the remaining Timorese after their vote for independance) and had failed to grasp that the US no longer supported them in Timor. In short order they failed to track the shift in their own fortunes as US did in perceiving that Indonesia was the plump, prime goal for Bin Laden's Andalusian empire of the East. Indonesia was as I said 6-12 months ago, a smoking timebomb (one can search our own archieves on these posts).
It is a fact that Australia became the proxy fighter to wrest Timor away from Indonesia despite US having once told Indonesia to go invade Timor, & that US would help them & help hide the deed. People like Marlowe who live in fairy-land re covert ops & world history & politics, can't wrap their brains around facts like these but whilst I have no idea what qualifications Marlowe has to judge international events by other than possibly reading comic books, I was an Air Defence officer in the Air Force when most of these earlier events took place & can provide anecdotes & stories & links to details that back up these points. I was there at the airbase in Australia that sent USAF U2s on spying missions over Indonesia (The 57th Weather Recon Squadron).
Cheers
Doug Marker
Just going to add this self justification - particularly re events in Indonesia... If at times I seem harsh to people (such as Marlowe)who open their mouths & step in where angels fear to tread (often up to their necks in their own crap), it is because I am usually speaking from in-depth awareness of the events being discussed and will have concluded that they know f***-all about the topic. Am willing to give them leeway based on inexperience, youth and lack of travel in the hope they will learn but if they (like Marlowe) keep crapping piles of obvious s*** I will rub their own noses in it. My major was in modern history & it has been a speciality ever since. Studying cults & religions was a later speciality. The south East Asain region is a particular area of expertise. It has helped enormously by living in & visiting nearly all S/E countries.
**************
#2 Added the following links re US oil etc: interests in Indonesia
[link|http://www.pacificnews.org/content/pns/2001/aug/0813stakes.html|Exxon & Aceh]
Excerpt ...
" In Indonesia, maintaining territorial integrity means continuing the Army's bloody repression campaigns in the oil- and mineral-rich provinces of Aceh and West Papua.
The RAND and CFR papers argue that revenues from these areas are vital for a stable Indonesia. They are also the sites of two of the largest U.S. investments in Indonesia:
* in Aceh, the Exxon-Mobil natural gas facility, which according to the Wall Street Journal, produced nearly a quarter of Mobil's earnings worldwide in the early 1990s * in West Papua, the huge mining development of Freeport-McMoran
It is hard to imagine that any campaign to insure territorial integrity in these areas could be compatible with democracy and human rights. Some 6000 people have been killed in Aceh in the last decade -- more than 1000 of them in the last six months . "
..............
" The Pentagon continued to train Kopassus secretly as part of another program until all U.S. aid was finally terminated in 1999, after a paramilitary rampage, orchestrated by army units including Kopassus, killed more than 600 East Timorese. "
..............
[link|http://www.isnet.org/~djoko/Reformasi%201998/Time%201/KillingFields.html|Reality alert as to who does what in Indonesia (Time Magazine)]
" Reasons for that silence include Indonesians' fear of the authoritarian Suharto, the complicity of many of them in the butchery, and the break-a-few-eggs ethos of the Cold War. Unlike the Khmer Rouge, Suharto's army did not monopolize the killing duties -- it also whipped up a frenzy of anti-communist, anti-Chinese sentiment and then distributed arms and lists of suspected communists to civilian Indonesians, urging them to wipe out the country's 3.5 million-strong Communist Party (PKI). Suharto's willing executioners, then, may number in the tens if not hundreds of thousands. Image One Day, Son, All This Will Be Yours... Suharto pictured with son Tommy, then 5, in 1968. The Suharto family were among the biggest beneficiaries of the wave of economic growth presided over by the president following the bloodbath of 1965-6. (AP photo/Warbung/stf) The West remained silent as Indonesia's army and its civilian militia went from town to town, rounding up suspected communists and ordering them to dig their own graves before killing them; sometimes decapitating the bodies and displaying the skulls. Teachers and other civic leaders were forced to draw up death lists of influential townsfolk (which many of them did in order to save themselves and others); while, in the words of a subsequent British intelligence report, the victims were "often no more than bewildered peasants who give the wrong answer on a dark night to bloodthirsty hooligans bent on violence." Eventually -- whipped up by the official anti-Beijing propaganda -- the mobs turned on masses of apolitical Indonesians of Chinese origins.
"
[link|http://www.truthinmedia.org/Bulletins99/tim99-9-6.html| Who trained the Kopassus Army death squads in Indonesia]
I won't add any more such reports - I don't want to cause poor Marlowe to die from a fit of appoplexy. (actually, it may not matter because there are probably far to many 'big words' for him to comprehend).
Edited by dmarker2
Oct. 14, 2002, 06:45:46 AM EDT
|
Post #56,804
10/14/02 9:48:46 PM
|
Re: Guess what - Osama was right - Oz was ...
Doug, I guess next time Andrew will have to add you to the list of who will tell them "they deserved it".
Facts, history and past actions seemed unimportant to some when it's time to reflect and analysize what happened, especially after tragic incidents like 9/11 or this.
It's so clear cut to them that it's DEFINITELY the other party's fault.
|
Post #56,814
10/14/02 10:06:05 PM
|
How amusing
I rarely peek into this forum. But now I look, and see a post by [link|/forums/render/user?username=TTC|TTC]. My immediate reaction is, "Hey! A new poster!" And then I look to see how new, and go, "Huh? How did I miss this guy."
Well it appears that I don't read here much, and you have actually been actively posting for a while now. So here is a delayed welcome aboard.
Cheers, Ben
"Career politicians are inherently untrustworthy; if it spends its life buzzing around the outhouse, it\ufffds probably a fly." - [link|http://www.nationalinterest.org/issues/58/Mead.html|Walter Mead]
|
Post #56,818
10/14/02 10:44:09 PM
|
Re: How amusing
Thx... been ard for quite a long time... since IWE... don't always post since Ashton usually sums it up rather eloquently, and with Brandioch providing the "taunts", I'm "redundant"... :)
|
Post #56,827
10/14/02 11:17:03 PM
10/14/02 11:17:31 PM
|
I guessed some of that
I just had no idea whether you read the rest of the site.
Cheers, Ben
"Career politicians are inherently untrustworthy; if it spends its life buzzing around the outhouse, it\ufffds probably a fly." - [link|http://www.nationalinterest.org/issues/58/Mead.html|Walter Mead]
Edited by ben_tilly
Oct. 14, 2002, 11:17:31 PM EDT
|
Post #56,830
10/14/02 11:25:17 PM
|
Hardly
redundant. Thanks for the compliment. I recall particularly Masterful ;-) summing-up of yours re some brouhahas in the 'Regulars VS IW Management' - a while back. Another belated, Welcome Back!
Pity that none of our screeds can ever get debated, thus perfected - in that rather wide venue which IW once had, then blew intentionally - for all standard bizness MBA reasons. Oh well.
Besides, find self in a rut on several topics; need new ideas: only solution to a Major source of discord in the universe I can find after mulling - is still, nuke Redmond. Effective but not very nice; must be the hate enviro rotting my sensibilities too..
Cheers,
Ashton
|