Original, yes

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #51,653 by hnick 9/13/02 12:29:49 PM Reply	Original, yes What I was responding to was >>Clinton = Rhodes Scholar >>Bush = C- student >> >>Nuff said. Smart or glib makes little difference that I can see. He now gets to spout whatever pleases him. The issue is now someone elses problem. As long as he doesn't say anything REALLY stupid, he can always come out looking great. He has no responsibility any more. He can state that some hard choices are the correct ones and it is still up to somebody else to take the heat of implementation. If he was right he can claim credit, if wrong, the other guy blew it. He's just a rather visible arm chair quarterback now.
Post #51,677 by Brandioch 9/13/02 4:38:48 PM Reply	Presidency by polls. He can state that some hard choices are the correct ones and it is still up to somebody else to take the heat of implementation. I still recall that his presidency seemed to be dominated by whatever poll was last taken. You're right. Now that he has no direct responsibility, he can spout off whatever he actually believes.
Post #51,680 by inthane-chan 9/13/02 4:54:45 PM Reply	Remeniscent of Reagan and the Brady Bill, eh? End of world rescheduled for day after tomorrow. Something should probably be done. Please advise.

Just watched Clinton on Letterman - (Silverlock) - (26) - Sept. 12, 2002, 01:01:44 AM EDT

Re: Just watched Clinton on Letterman - (jb4) - Sept. 12, 2002, 08:49:24 AM EDT

Re: Just watched Clinton on Letterman - (wharris2) - (6) - Sept. 12, 2002, 11:44:36 AM EDT

An answer for you - (Silverlock) - (5) - Sept. 13, 2002, 02:54:31 PM EDT

Uh-heh - (wharris2) - (4) - Sept. 16, 2002, 11:03:55 PM EDT

Nicely done - (Silverlock) - (3) - Sept. 17, 2002, 10:27:41 AM EDT

Re: Nicely done - (wharris2) - (2) - Sept. 17, 2002, 10:57:46 AM EDT

Whatever -NT - (Silverlock) - Sept. 17, 2002, 11:03:02 AM EDT

Depends on your definition of "do" -NT - (bbronson) - Sept. 17, 2002, 12:14:47 PM EDT

It's not that he's smart. It's that you're stupid. - (marlowe) - (15) - Sept. 12, 2002, 11:49:22 AM EDT

Sod off - (Silverlock) - (14) - Sept. 13, 2002, 02:55:36 PM EDT

Get off your high horse - (wharris2) - (13) - Sept. 12, 2002, 12:11:03 PM EDT

Ermmm.... - (Silverlock) - (12) - Sept. 12, 2002, 12:44:20 PM EDT

Re: Ermmm.... - (wharris2) - (11) - Sept. 12, 2002, 09:32:15 PM EDT

What is it with certain people? - (Brandioch) - (3) - Sept. 13, 2002, 12:00:19 AM EDT

Par -NT - (bepatient) - (2) - Sept. 13, 2002, 02:20:25 AM EDT

I agree.... - (Simon_Jester) - (1) - Sept. 13, 2002, 08:48:40 AM EDT

Finally, something we all can agree on. ;-) - (inthane-chan) - Sept. 13, 2002, 11:58:30 AM EDT

By this I assume you didn't see the interview. - (Silverlock) - (6) - Sept. 13, 2002, 09:40:19 AM EDT

Not a question of intellectual prowess - (hnick) - (5) - Sept. 13, 2002, 11:53:08 AM EDT

Actually...that was the original question - (Simon_Jester) - (4) - Sept. 13, 2002, 12:16:51 PM EDT

Original, yes - (hnick) - (2) - Sept. 13, 2002, 12:29:49 PM EDT

Presidency by polls. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Sept. 13, 2002, 04:38:48 PM EDT

Remeniscent of Reagan and the Brady Bill, eh? -NT - (inthane-chan) - Sept. 13, 2002, 04:54:45 PM EDT

Do not confuse intelligence with common sense - (admin) - Sept. 13, 2002, 01:21:17 PM EDT

haha - (SpiceWare) - (1) - Sept. 12, 2002, 10:23:48 PM EDT

dont confuse glib with brilliance - (boxley) - Sept. 12, 2002, 10:41:09 PM EDT

You know them Gnomes don't make no good money.
46 ms