OpEd: Reasons to get Saddam now - (marlowe) - (16) - Aug. 5, 2002, 04:18:44 PM EDT
         #1 reason: More money for Halliburton. -NT - (Silverlock) - Aug. 5, 2002, 04:40:10 PM EDT
         Saddam has ICBM's? - (Brandioch) - (7) - Aug. 5, 2002, 06:40:59 PM EDT
             GMAB - (wharris2) - (6) - Aug. 5, 2002, 09:41:05 PM EDT
                 Possible, but I don't see that happening. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Aug. 5, 2002, 11:07:34 PM EDT
                     subcontracting the delivery is possible -NT - (boxley) - Aug. 6, 2002, 08:52:48 AM EDT
                 Egads! That can't be so... - (Simon_Jester) - (3) - Aug. 6, 2002, 09:06:16 AM EDT
                     They won't be without them forever - (wharris2) - (2) - Aug. 6, 2002, 10:21:37 AM EDT
                         Which gets back to my "anarchy" example. - (Brandioch) - Aug. 6, 2002, 11:15:13 AM EDT
                         True... but it does raise the point - (Simon_Jester) - Aug. 6, 2002, 11:22:20 AM EDT
         A well reason case why not to invade - (dmarker2) - (5) - Aug. 6, 2002, 05:12:01 AM EDT
             My pet theory... - (ChrisR) - (2) - Aug. 6, 2002, 11:43:30 AM EDT
                 But Iraq isn't fundie - (mhuber) - (1) - Aug. 7, 2002, 12:46:45 AM EDT
                     Sheesh.. claw way to White House so you can - (Ashton) - Aug. 7, 2002, 03:51:34 AM EDT
             Iraq: Vietnam of 21st century? - (Arkadiy) - (1) - Aug. 6, 2002, 12:33:14 PM EDT
                 Don't think so: __it's Another crap shoot.. - (Ashton) - Aug. 6, 2002, 06:20:15 PM EDT
         Real easy to get Saddam - (orion) - Aug. 7, 2002, 04:23:28 PM EDT