IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Possible, but I don't see that happening.
Iraq doesn't do the suicide bomber scene. That's a Saudi and Palestinian thing.

To put it another way, there is the same chance that an Iraqi suicide bomber will carry a nuke to the US as there is that a Chinese suicide bomber will carry a nuke to the US. Just as no Russian suicide bombers carried nukes to the US during the cold war.

The same with the chemical/biological attacks.

If he did develop them, we would not be his first target. Just as he didn't fire a bunch of SCUD's with chemicals on Israel during Gulf War I. But he will use chemicals against the Kurds.
New subcontracting the delivery is possible
."Once, in the wilds of Afghanistan, I had to subsist on food and water for several weeks." W.C. Fields
     OpEd: Reasons to get Saddam now - (marlowe) - (16)
         #1 reason: More money for Halliburton. -NT - (Silverlock)
         Saddam has ICBM's? - (Brandioch) - (7)
             GMAB - (wharris2) - (6)
                 Possible, but I don't see that happening. - (Brandioch) - (1)
                     subcontracting the delivery is possible -NT - (boxley)
                 Egads! That can't be so... - (Simon_Jester) - (3)
                     They won't be without them forever - (wharris2) - (2)
                         Which gets back to my "anarchy" example. - (Brandioch)
                         True... but it does raise the point - (Simon_Jester)
         A well reason case why not to invade - (dmarker2) - (5)
             My pet theory... - (ChrisR) - (2)
                 But Iraq isn't fundie - (mhuber) - (1)
                     Sheesh.. claw way to White House so you can - (Ashton)
             Iraq: Vietnam of 21st century? - (Arkadiy) - (1)
                 Don't think so: __it's Another crap shoot.. - (Ashton)
         Real easy to get Saddam - (orion)

I have a horse!
37 ms