She's selling stuff.
At the bottom of that page is this affiliate link:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00TRM0UI4/ref=as_li_qf_asin_il_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=theheahomec0a-20&creative=9325&linkCode=as2&creativeASIN=B00TRM0UI4&linkId=0fa1efc604177d856b37c5fddc6d46ac
And I can, one hundred percent, guaran-fuck-ing-tee that all that device does is transfer $49.99 plus shipping out of your bank account.
An admittedly cursory check for citations of the German paper (which is 18 years old at this point) shows it turning exclusively on woo-peddling sites like this:
https://es-ireland.com/masts-antennae/#:~:text=Research%20shows%20higher%20rates%20of%20illnesses%20and%20cancers,was%20three%20times%20as%20high.%20%28See%20Studies%20Below%29
Note the Gish Gallop of seemingly authoritative papers etc.
There's nothing on Cochrane.org about it. You'd think there'd be a systematic study available by now.
The American Cancer society is less breathless about it:
https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/radiation-exposure/cellular-phone-towers.html
The UK is a densely-populated country and the majority of our cellular infrastructure is where the people are. If there was anything to either the German or Israeli papers, we should be seeing obvious clusters of additional cancers around the many, many cellular towers located in residential areas. If these clusters exist, no-one's talking about them. At all.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00TRM0UI4/ref=as_li_qf_asin_il_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=theheahomec0a-20&creative=9325&linkCode=as2&creativeASIN=B00TRM0UI4&linkId=0fa1efc604177d856b37c5fddc6d46ac
And I can, one hundred percent, guaran-fuck-ing-tee that all that device does is transfer $49.99 plus shipping out of your bank account.
An admittedly cursory check for citations of the German paper (which is 18 years old at this point) shows it turning exclusively on woo-peddling sites like this:
https://es-ireland.com/masts-antennae/#:~:text=Research%20shows%20higher%20rates%20of%20illnesses%20and%20cancers,was%20three%20times%20as%20high.%20%28See%20Studies%20Below%29
Note the Gish Gallop of seemingly authoritative papers etc.
There's nothing on Cochrane.org about it. You'd think there'd be a systematic study available by now.
The American Cancer society is less breathless about it:
So far, not many studies in people have focused specifically on cellular phone towers and cancer risk, and the results of these studies have not provided clear answers.
A large British study comparing families of young children with cancer with families of children without cancer found no link between a mother’s exposure to the towers during pregnancy (based on the distance from the home to the nearest tower and on the amount of energy from RF waves given off by nearby towers) and the risk of early childhood cancer.
Researchers in Taiwan compared children with cancer to a group of similar children without cancer. They found slightly higher overall risk of cancer in those who lived in towns that had an estimated RF exposure from cell phone towers that was above the midpoint level in the study. However, this finding was less apparent when RF exposure was categorized in other ways.
Both of these studies relied on estimates of RF exposure. Neither of them measured the actual exposure of people to RF waves from nearby cell phone towers. This limitation makes it harder to know what the results of these studies might mean.
https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/radiation-exposure/cellular-phone-towers.html
The UK is a densely-populated country and the majority of our cellular infrastructure is where the people are. If there was anything to either the German or Israeli papers, we should be seeing obvious clusters of additional cancers around the many, many cellular towers located in residential areas. If these clusters exist, no-one's talking about them. At all.
