Shame we can’t tempt de Sitter back here

Post #440,685 by rcareaga 1/13/22 3:17:59 PM 1/13/22 3:17:59 PM Reply	Shame we can’t tempt de Sitter back here He insists that he knows where JWST ought to look in order to verify DSL’s cosmology (which I am not remotely competent to evaluate), putting paid to all of this “black hole” and “big bang” nonsense. cordially,
Post #440,686 by InThane 1/13/22 3:52:42 PM 1/13/22 3:52:42 PM Reply	I do wonder... ...how he'd explain the photographs we've taken OF black holes... Ceterum autem censeo pars Republican esse delendam.
Post #440,687 by rcareaga 1/13/22 4:05:17 PM 1/13/22 4:05:17 PM Reply	He’s rather certain …that he’s right and most astrophysicists wrong, so I suspect he could explain away the images as being misinterpretations. Again, I’m not remotely competent to evaluate the contending claims, although I suspect that DRL’s model might have attracted a few more champions had it been more persuasive. cordially,
Post #440,691 by pwhysall 1/14/22 9:02:23 AM 1/14/22 9:02:23 AM Reply	Point of order We haven't taken any pictures of black holes. We have taken pictures of related phenomena such as highly-energetic accretion discs which strongly imply the presence of black holes.
Post #440,709 by CRConrad 1/17/22 2:28:29 AM 1/17/22 2:28:29 AM Reply	Yeah, what those accretion discs show stuff falling into may well be astrophysicist egos.

Welcome to IWETHEY!