Post #437,734
12/14/20 2:44:10 AM
12/14/20 2:44:10 AM
|
Conservatism is authoritarianism
The subset of human activities to which they do not wish to apply overweening state control are constrained to certain classes of economic activity, primarily those engaged in by the wealthy.
Everything else is rules, rules, rules.
Can't say this or that. Must obey the state god. Must not put this in your body. Cannot take that out of your body. Prison sentences are long, prison regimes are punitive. Death is a valid sentence. Police and the armed forces are to be worshipped.
|
Post #437,735
12/14/20 10:05:52 AM
12/14/20 10:05:52 AM
|
A theory doesn't have to be true to be useful
If it predicts behavior better than other theories, might as well go with it. "The Republican party is based on racism, misogyny, and redistributing wealth upward."
Oh no, I don't support those ideals!
No, you just favor policies that support those ideals. Works out the same.
|
Post #437,745
12/14/20 3:13:31 PM
12/14/20 3:13:31 PM
|
Given the proven ~40% functionally illiterate: That's a Wrap! :-/
Four out of every [statistical-] 10: remain, wallow-in, staying iggerant-for Liff. Words fail (in the rest of 'us').
It's. All. become. surreal. Whilst: nobody has an answer for my Test-query: "What is a stronger word than ludicrous?"
Rudderless in beautiful-downtown-Burbank* Kenwood :-}
A memorable quip from yesteryear: Laugh-In--a TV-show I've missed sorely ever since. Gotta google to see if some wry clips are extant, under 'TV HOOTS of yore'.
|
Post #437,751
12/14/20 4:08:05 PM
12/14/20 5:52:01 PM
|
Frank Wilhoit in 2018
He secured a kind of immortality with this observation in a comment thread at the “Crooked Timber” blog: Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit:
There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.
There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time. cordially,
Edited by rcareaga
Dec. 14, 2020, 05:52:01 PM EST
|
Post #437,753
12/14/20 4:16:48 PM
12/14/20 4:16:48 PM
|
's what I sed, innit?
But yeah. I just had a tad more detail.
|
Post #437,756
12/14/20 6:15:39 PM
12/14/20 6:15:39 PM
|
He had a tad more detail in the comment, Rand just quoted the quotable part
|
Post #437,767
12/15/20 2:20:46 AM
12/15/20 2:20:46 AM
|
I keed, I keed.
|
Post #437,755
12/14/20 6:14:18 PM
12/14/20 6:14:18 PM
|
Is "Wilhoit's Law" on Wikipedia yet?
|
Post #437,760
12/14/20 8:19:22 PM
12/14/20 8:19:22 PM
|
Not Wiki yet but Google gets a variety of other sites: this pithiest-yet ∑ gots Legs already.
|
Post #437,761
12/14/20 9:32:14 PM
12/14/20 9:32:14 PM
|
DeLong has a pointer to the full comment.
|
Post #437,764
12/14/20 11:55:22 PM
12/14/20 11:55:50 PM
|
Was a professor of political science
Edited by drook
Dec. 14, 2020, 11:55:50 PM EST
|
Post #437,765
12/15/20 12:32:50 AM
12/15/20 12:32:50 AM
|
Back from the dead?
Son? Some other relation? No relation? This one is a "contemporary classical" musician, among other things. https://www.broadheath.com/:-) Cheers, Scott.
|
Post #437,766
12/15/20 12:38:19 AM
12/15/20 12:38:19 AM
|
Whoops, didn't notice the dates
|
Post #439,139
5/19/21 8:22:27 AM
5/19/21 8:22:27 AM
|
Moonlighted as a detective in Oxford.
WP:Wilhoit lived alone, and he was an opera aficionado. BTW, DrooK: No mention of any family, the sentence quoted above is all it says about his personal life, so I'm guessing composer and aphorist Frank is not a son. (If anything, "lived alone" feels like "confirmed bachelor", i.e. code for "closeted gay".)
--
Christian R. Conrad The Man Who Apparently Still Knows Fucking EverythingMail: Same username as at the top left of this post, at iki.fi
|
Post #441,634
6/3/22 7:02:03 PM
6/3/22 7:02:03 PM
|
Interview with him at Slate.
|