Comparative benchmarks, for those curious about the performance uplift:

Post #431,830 by pwhysall 12/3/19 2:24:58 AM 12/3/19 2:24:58 AM Reply	Comparative benchmarks, for those curious about the performance uplift: GPU: https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-1060-6GB-vs-AMD-RX-5700-XT/3639vs4045 tl;dr: it's twice as fast at everything. (Ignore the part about the reference card dropping frames; I haven't got one of those and it's not an issue for me) CPU: https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-Ryzen-7-3700X-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-1600/4043vs3919 A more incremental increase here, but still 35%-ish is not to be sneezed at.
Post #431,846 by malraux 12/4/19 8:28:53 AM 12/4/19 8:28:53 AM Reply	Re: Comparative benchmarks, for those curious about the performance uplift: We have an RTX 2060, not quite as fast as your new one. It's pretty good for a budget gaming PC. CPU is i5 8400. I've managed to get it to hitch up a bit with Skyrim on Ultra settings and a bunch of mods but it plays Destiny 2 just fine. Regards, -scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
Post #431,847 by pwhysall 12/4/19 8:50:54 AM 12/4/19 8:50:54 AM Reply	Re: Comparative benchmarks, for those curious about the performance uplift: Destiny 2 is a remarkable engine. It looks great, has incredible lighting, and my current rig can run it at 1440p60 most of the time, although there are certain places where the frame rate reliably gets it in the shorts - most notably on Mercury, which is ironic as it's one of the smallest, simplest maps. Borderlands 3, on the other hand? Yeah, I'm gonna overcome Gearbox's shit implementation of ue4 with sheer power.

Welcome to IWETHEY!