IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New No offense, but your white male privilege is showing.
Trump is proudly spouting racist nonsense. He is proudly shouting misogynistic nonsense. He proudly lies about his record, his proposals, and what he has said a few hours earlier. He's like the rest of the GOP in wanting to slash taxes for the wealthy and gut Planned Parenthood and impose more restrictions on abortion:

Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump defended Planned Parenthood during an interview Tuesday night, doubling down on his remarks that part of the group should be funded.

“They do good things,” Trump said during an interview with Sean Hannity that aired on Fox News.

“There's two Planned Parenthoods, in a way. You have it as an abortion clinic. Now that's actually a fairly small part of what they do, but it’s a brutal part and I'm totally against it,” Trump said.

“They also, however, service women,” Trump said, adding later, “We have to help women. A lot of women are helped. So we have to look at the positives for Planned Parenthood.”


Later:

“Look, Planned Parenthood has done very good work for many, many — for millions of women,” Trump said in a news conference Tuesday night. “And I’ll say it, and I know a lot of the so-called conservatives, they say that’s really … cause I’m a conservative, but I’m a common-sense conservative.”

Trump said he would not fund Planned Parenthood “as long as you have the abortion going on,” but noted the “millions of people — and I’ve had thousands of letters from women — that have been helped.”


IOW - "PP does great things, but I'm going to cut off all of their funding until they stop providing abortions."

Trump is not the "lesser evil". Trump is the "greater evil". Voting for him is a vote for the Republican candidate, and a vote for the reactionary policies they've put in place in DC and across the country.

It's fine to dislike Hillary, but don't try to argue that Trump is somehow better in any way. He's not.

"The system will collapse" isn't something to be wished for. Afghanistan and South Sudan and Yemen have systems that collapsed - they're not better off as a result. The system can be fixed by keeping the White House, flipping 6-12 seats in the Senate, and flipping a few dozen seats in the House. That's all it takes. Letting Trump and his angry minions burn the place down won't "fix" anything.

You might want to bookmark this post, as I'm likely to keep posting pointers to it if you keep up this line of argument. ;-)

My $0.02.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Re: The system can be fixed by keeping the White House, flipping 6-12 seats ...
You cannot be serious. We have actual *history* that belies that claim. What was the Senate composition in 2009? Remind me, was a "democrat" in the White House then? What was the composition of the Congress then? The system *cannot* change if we keep putting Republicans (no matter how they brand themselves) in charge.
Expand Edited by mmoffitt March 21, 2016, 03:36:31 PM EDT
New Yes, I am deadly serious.
Look at what happened when someone last won the Republican nomination and had a Republican Senate.

W's administration had a Republican Senate from 2001-2007 (with some brief 50/50 periods in there where Cheney could break ties). It wasn't that long ago.

Remember Iraq Body Count?

(Hillary, Biden, Kerry and others voting for the AUMF resolution in October 2002 is not the same as W twisting the intelligence to get his desired result. Hillary didn't say "We're taking (Saddam) out!" in March 2002.)

You, by your professed intended actions, are willing to vote to install another Republican nominee in the White House (which would also let that party keep the Senate).

I wish you'd snap out of your purity mania and look at what is actually happening. Hillary isn't running for the Republican nomination. The GOP isn't advocating a $15 minimum wage.

The GOP broke the House and is trying to break the Senate (won't do their jobs) and is trying to break the SCOTUS. Hillary isn't doing that.

There's a world of difference between the parties now.

My $0.02.

Cheers,
Scott.
     the Garland nomination - (rcareaga) - (49)
         Now there's a thought - (drook)
         With a Repo Senate this is as good as it gets. - (a6l6e6x)
         a very reasonable choice for the position. -NT - (boxley)
         Not to confound your expectations, but - (hnick) - (42)
             sorry 'bout the dearth of rainbows & unicorns, keed -NT - (rcareaga) - (41)
                 We're all fascists here. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (40)
                     IIRC, you're the only one talking about voting for Trump... ;-p -NT - (Another Scott) - (39)
                         And you guys are voting for the other one. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (38)
                             Yep, it's gaming theory's alpha beta pruning. - (a6l6e6x) - (37)
                                 Which one would that be? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (36)
                                     Trump will do more damage unless you're a Nazi. :) - (a6l6e6x) - (35)
                                         as they pull out musings from their ass - (boxley)
                                         Heh. - (mmoffitt) - (33)
                                             Nope. - (Another Scott) - (31)
                                                 I believe you have identified the problem - (hnick) - (2)
                                                     The Democrats may not be running what we used to call a Democrat - (malraux)
                                                     hey, at least she stays bought look at her sec state record for influence peddling -NT - (boxley)
                                                 I'm a Republican? - (mmoffitt) - (27)
                                                     Re: I'm a Republican? - (malraux) - (5)
                                                         Moving to the Right a little is as bad as moving to the Right a lot. - (mmoffitt) - (4)
                                                             Germany 1930s would seem to be a counter example. -NT - (malraux) - (3)
                                                                 How'd that work out for Germany in the 40's? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                                                                     Uh, yeah, that's my point... -NT - (malraux) - (1)
                                                                         Same road, same destination, different pace. -NT - (mmoffitt)
                                                     Is Trump running for the Republican nomination? Is Hillary? ;-p - (Another Scott) - (20)
                                                         ... - (mmoffitt) - (19)
                                                             No offense, but your white male privilege is showing. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                                                 Re: The system can be fixed by keeping the White House, flipping 6-12 seats ... - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                                                                     Yes, I am deadly serious. - (Another Scott)
                                                             Yours is an unanswerable argument - (rcareaga) - (1)
                                                                 Hillary's not a Republican? I thought her husband said so. -NT - (mmoffitt)
                                                             BS - (malraux) - (13)
                                                                 why not? Her husband certainly did. He ran and won on the "contract for america" -NT - (boxley) - (3)
                                                                     Eh? CfA was 1994. You know, the election where the House flipped to punish Bill? -NT - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                                                         Re: Eh? CfA was 1994. - (rcareaga)
                                                                         he ended welfare as we know it passed harsh sentences on criminals took credit for it plus others - (boxley)
                                                                 Not all, but many. - (mmoffitt) - (8)
                                                                     Let's play counter-factuals. - (Another Scott) - (7)
                                                                         The Dumacratic Party, you mean. - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                                                                             If they can't win the nomination, they can't be elected. That's the way it's always been. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                                                 FiFY. - (mmoffitt)
                                                                         katrina would have hit mexico instead and the arabs would have missed the towers cause gore? hardly -NT - (boxley) - (3)
                                                                             Katrina was much, much more than a hurricane. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                                                 bernie I hope -NT - (boxley)
                                                                             the arabs would have missed the towers cause gore? har - (rcareaga)
                                             All politicians are liars. - (a6l6e6x)
         Hatch was on Morning Edition. - (Another Scott) - (2)
             Of course he knew it. These interviews are particularly infuriating. - (rcareaga) - (1)
                 Half lying - (drook)

*gloat*
58 ms