want to be safe? Dont go anywhere near a gun free zone. If laws worked it would work there

Post #405,073 by boxley 10/3/15 1:56:15 PM Reply	want to be safe? Dont go anywhere near a gun free zone. If laws worked it would work there you can kill people for America at age 18 but need to be 21 to buy a beer
Post #405,075 by Ashton 10/3/15 2:18:16 PM Reply	Oh. Well. Then. ... ... if Laws don't work in the dis-U.S. (as in Oz and other places) ... Guess we'll just have to declare open season and let thousands of vigilante groups don their kevlar jackets, grab their full-auto what-evers and go gunnin for everyone-Else with guns. Gotta watch the lapel pins to see which-SIDE yer gunnin-FOR or gunnin-ON, while tryin to reason with guys-with-tiny-penises. Write-off all governance elsewhere too then, while trying to script That clusterfuck. (We may have to fumigate the entire US and start over, but who would bury the bodies?) ..but let's not quibble about the time for the bad smells to go away, so the repopulation can start. The other species can use the respite from biped predation, to try to take back some of their territory First. Carrion ... let's Arm animals in self defense before we let any of the New-proles have guns, later-on.. There! FIFY
Post #405,079 by hnick 10/3/15 3:38:51 PM Reply	Oh, working laws... So... there's no point in gun registration laws because they categorically don't work. On the other paw, we desperately need stringent voter registration laws because THEY will clearly prevent voter fraud. The only thing that is clear is that the fright wing mind has no concept of irony. "Religion, n. A daughter of Hope and Fear, explaining to Ignorance the nature of the Unknowable." ~ AMBROSE BIERCE (1842-1914)
Post #405,080 by boxley 10/3/15 4:20:57 PM Reply	voter id doesnt work when the dem poll worker votes for you you can kill people for America at age 18 but need to be 21 to buy a beer
Post #405,084 by Another Scott 10/3/15 9:04:09 PM Reply	You mean... Voter ID works just fine for its intended purpose. Of course, its intended purpose has nothing to do with preventing in-person voter fraud - something as rare as at most 31 / 1,000,000,000 in 15 years. HTH. Cheers, Scott.
Post #405,083 by Another Scott 10/3/15 8:55:42 PM Reply	So they'll be charging this guy then? ThinkProgress: It was the policy of university administrators to limit the use of guns to the extent allowed by law. But, as ThinkProgress and the New York Times reported, Oregon is one of seven states that allows concealed carry on postsecondary campuses. This was based on a 2011 state court decision invalidating efforts to ban guns at public universities in Oregon. Public colleges like UCC are permitted to exclude concealed weapons from certain buildings and facilities but not the campus in general. But not only was UCC not a gun free zone by law, there were also people who brought guns onto campus at the time of the massacre. John Parker Jr., a veteran and student at UCC, spoke with MSNBC and revealed that he was in a campus building with a concealed handgun when the shooting started. He suggested other students with him at the time were also carrying concealed handguns. [...] Laws work just fine - as well as any human construct. Cheers, Scott.
Post #405,176 by pwhysall 10/7/15 2:43:49 AM Reply	I was just thinking That a school, full of hormonal teenagers behaving erratically at the best of times, whose moral compass is spinning wildly, and whose decision-making and risk analysis skills are famously ~~excellent~~shit, is the ideal place to have people carrying guns. After all, what could possibly go wrong?
Post #405,180 by boxley 10/7/15 11:22:03 AM Reply	thats highschool, collitch is different, you have to pay to go there you can kill people for America at age 18 but need to be 21 to buy a beer
Post #405,184 by lincoln 10/7/15 12:45:49 PM Reply	And how will that prevent some male from getting dumped by a girl, so he gets drunk & decides that if he can't have her, n o one else can, so he grabs his pistol and heads over to wait outside the girl's dorm until she comes out ... ? Satan (impatiently) to Newcomer: The trouble with you Chicago people is, that you think you are the best people down here; whereas you are merely the most numerous. - - - Mark Twain, "Pudd'nhead Wilson's New Calendar" 1897
Post #405,187 by boxley 10/7/15 1:59:50 PM 10/7/15 9:16:58 PM Reply	grabs baseball bat, knife, golf club, belt, gasoline, meat cleaver (added) http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=464422&page=1 http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/man-pleads-guilty-killing-5-relatives-meat-cleaver-n440596 good thing he didnt have two of them you can kill people for America at age 18 but need to be 21 to buy a beer Edited by boxley Oct. 7, 2015, 09:16:58 PM EDT Expand All History
Post #405,201 by lincoln 10/8/15 10:31:19 AM Reply	which of those items are designed to specifically kill a living creature, like guns are? Satan (impatiently) to Newcomer: The trouble with you Chicago people is, that you think you are the best people down here; whereas you are merely the most numerous. - - - Mark Twain, "Pudd'nhead Wilson's New Calendar" 1897
Post #405,205 by boxley 10/8/15 11:27:19 AM Reply	knives, but if you want to ban guns here are 5 easy steps to do that https://reason.com/reasontv/2015/10/07/how-to-create-a-gun-free-america-in-5-ea I suggest you get right on that. Let me know how it goes. you can kill people for America at age 18 but need to be 21 to buy a beer
Post #405,208 by lincoln 10/8/15 1:34:00 PM Reply	Never said I want to ban guns, but we need stricter regulation Congress should tell states, in the wake of this surely worse epidemic of gun violence, that they must put some substance into the phrase “well-regulated militia.” They must define well-regulated militia to include not only the National Guard, but all legally registered gun-owners in the state. If they fail to do so, and in line with the precedent set by the drinking-age act, they risk losing 10 percent of their federal law-enforcement funding. Why not? Who could argue with such a move? It would be precisely in the spirit of the Second Amendment as worded, in which the right to keep and bear arms is granted within the context of the existence of such a militia. The founders spoke explicitly of said militia. So, let’s make it! Legally registered gun-owners would become members of each state’s more broadly construed militia. They would not, obviously, be required to report for service on certain weekends like Guard members do. But their membership in this broader militia would come with certain responsibilities. First, they could be obliged by law to keep their guns in a locked, steel safe to which only the registered owner has access. They could also be obliged to undergo certain testing and evaluation before being permitted to own certain kinds of guns—or, depending on the state, barred from owning certain types of guns at all, or barred from keeping them at home (that is, they could buy and own them, but they would have to keep those guns at the firing range, which after all is the only place where they can be legitimately used). Obviously, hunting rifles would not be covered here under any circumstance, and maybe the federal law could even state that explicitly, so that legitimate sportsmen could rest easy and the National Rifle Association wouldn’t be able to play that card. Congress could toss a few other little sweeteners into such legislation—for example, it could subsidize the purchase of steel safes for a short time, much as it is about to subsidize the purchase of health insurance. Something tells me conservatives wouldn’t caterwaul about this subsidy so much! http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/12/18/how-we-can-regulate-guns-using-the-second-amendment.html Satan (impatiently) to Newcomer: The trouble with you Chicago people is, that you think you are the best people down here; whereas you are merely the most numerous. - - - Mark Twain, "Pudd'nhead Wilson's New Calendar" 1897
Post #405,209 by boxley 10/8/15 2:27:55 PM Reply	good luck with that one too, let me know how it turns out. whole point of registration is to know where to come and pick them up. People dont mind checks but loath registration. you can kill people for America at age 18 but need to be 21 to buy a beer
Post #405,216 by lincoln 10/8/15 5:56:17 PM Reply	Let's treat guns like other things Republicans despise Satan (impatiently) to Newcomer: The trouble with you Chicago people is, that you think you are the best people down here; whereas you are merely the most numerous. - - - Mark Twain, "Pudd'nhead Wilson's New Calendar" 1897
Post #405,219 by boxley 10/8/15 6:22:05 PM Reply	linky no worky you can kill people for America at age 18 but need to be 21 to buy a beer
Post #405,226 by scoenye 10/8/15 8:52:44 PM Reply	OK here. I get an embedded image.
Post #405,228 by boxley 10/8/15 8:54:41 PM Reply	badger tool was blocking you can kill people for America at age 18 but need to be 21 to buy a beer
Post #405,229 by boxley 10/8/15 8:55:49 PM Reply	no problem, so how are you going to get democrats onboard? Many hate the idea of registration you can kill people for America at age 18 but need to be 21 to buy a beer
Post #418,522 by CRConrad 6/13/17 4:29:09 AM 6/13/17 4:29:09 AM Reply	Most knives are designed for cutting food, whittling wood, peeling apples, etc, etc. HTH! But you knew that even as you posted that bullshit, didn't you? One wonders, how does it feel to live without any intellectual honesty at all? Were you born this way, or have you somehow got rid of it along the way? If you had it but lost it, was this by accident, or did it take intention and conscious effort? And, of course: Are you proud of being such an inveterate spewer of disruptive dreck, or do you, at long last, even have the fucking decency to be at least a little ashamed of it? -- Christian R. Conrad Same old username (as above), but now on iki.fi (Yeah, yeah, it redirects to the same old GMail... But just in case I ever want to change.)

Welcome to IWETHEY!