IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New 55Hz?!?
I was always told the resonace freq. in questions was ~18Hz

Another urban legend?
jb4

(Resistance is not futile...)
New 8-9Hz is the proper freq...
...well below hearing. (Learned this from a sound expert when we were testing the range of my parimetric eq with a pink noise generator and some *really* good reference speakers)

By reference. The low E string on a normal electric bass guitar is ~40hz. The low B on 5 and 6 string basses comes in at ~30Hz. Human hearing usually stops at around 20Hz
Jay O'Connor

"Going places unmapped
to do things unplanned
to people unsuspecting"
New Very low E
So a good doubler should make the 1st subharmonic of the bass's E string around 20Hz (the audible threshold), and that same doubler on a low B string should produce an inaudible subharmonic?
jb4

(Resistance is not futile...)
New Yes, but...
...most speakers that can even reach 20hz flat have a serious db dropoff below 20 hz
Jay O'Connor

"Going places unmapped
to do things unplanned
to people unsuspecting"
New The French did the research ~ '60s. Ethics quiz in box.
iirc. I saw pix, read articles.

~54 IS the res. freq. for (most) anal sphincters YMMV. And a hi-enough level WILL do exactly what you imagine.

Now for pretty-Quick death - prolly sweep from 50ish on down. Find res-freq. of adrenals, liver, heart etc. along the way. Shake loose and more. Just a matter of time/intensity chosen. There is NO credible data on the Gaussian spread, MLDs (min. lethal dose): for fucking Obvious reasons, I'd opine.

French built a battlefield weapon, a Medusa-headed monster capable of creating such levels. Probably killed a few cows, pigs, Murican tourists tryin ta touch the Mona Lisa's frame -- and other undesirables.

Prolly best forget conventional Helmholz resonators and variant 'speaker' transducer techno. Compressed air is the coupling, when at such humongous amplitudes. A size consideration, among others..

No, I haven't followed-up on 'progress' since. But simple physics shows it obviously possible, and how to do it. Where there's a will... (And we all know where the $ \ufffd are always spent FIRST: more effective killing.) It's virtually the Hallmark of our er civilizations. Resonance! - now we can kill with 'music' too. After all,


God is Love. And we surely are a God-ly People, to hear us tell about it..



Ashton

Ethics quiz: is it more merciful to kill millions slowly via Big-Mac ads with toys to lure kiddies and form their eating habits? or - to make Medusa-headed music-killers - which operate more er locally, but quicker?

Extra points for brevity & clarity, you lawstudents.
New Once again the LRPD captures the essence..
Cry Havoc! and loose the Dogs of War

{sigh}

LRPD Lives!
New Nope.
54Hz is way too high. There's too much happening in that range that if it was the range, you would see much more evidence.

According to [link|http://www.newphys.se/elektromagnum/physics/KeelyNet/flanagan/flan2.txt|this link] they pegged it about 13hz in a live situation in the 60s
Jay O'Connor

"Going places unmapped
to do things unplanned
to people unsuspecting"
New Huh? Read first 2 \ufffd, one more time.
I *SAID* that 54 Hz was about the anal sphincter. "On down" MEANS:


Yes you must go lower to kill, though even 54 WILL KILL after sustained high exposure. There can be no *ONE* lethal exact frequency, though 7- 20 hertz is indeed ~the range the French mentioned for 'best results'. Obviously different, size, shape, age carbon units will react according to F=MA.
More detail would need experiment - an obvious difficulty.

As to relevance of the barium titanate folk and their investigations - some I read there, is uncomfortably reminiscent of long pseudo-science papers amongst acolytes. Measuring the energy of chakras .. is just one such phrase. Nothing I saw about 140+ dB audio for nefarious purposes. (And that damn well won't be 'capacitively coupled', either!)

I will accept that resonance implies: you stay at One freq. long enough to see IF it's doing the job. So a merely continuous-sweep gen, isn't a likely effective mode. But there is no "13.10371" Hz magic death frequency, however romantic be the idea.

(Hey I'm an Ex- audio consultant too - Marantz, Crown, Revox, Infinity yada yada. They paid me $ too. None of that lore scales well to *this topic*, y'know?)


A.
     cool bumperstickers - (boxley) - (13)
         Avoid Smith & Wesson guns at all cost! What's the darn use.. - (CRConrad) - (12)
             You're confused again CRC. - (Ashton) - (11)
                 wp is okay I guess but I would much rather have - (boxley) - (10)
                     Cackle... urp.. ssssss - (Ashton) - (9)
                         yea fusing would be a problem - (boxley)
                         55Hz?!? - (jb4) - (7)
                             8-9Hz is the proper freq... - (Fearless Freep) - (6)
                                 Very low E - (jb4) - (1)
                                     Yes, but... - (Fearless Freep)
                                 The French did the research ~ '60s. Ethics quiz in box. - (Ashton) - (3)
                                     Once again the LRPD captures the essence.. - (Ashton)
                                     Nope. - (Fearless Freep) - (1)
                                         Huh? Read first 2 \ufffd, one more time. - (Ashton)

Ain't science wunnaful?
70 ms