IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Alternates for pilots?
(Muricans love black/white Draconian answers to serious, complex questions.)

Given the cut-throat competition for one of the Well-paid slots (whatever the ratio to the often insulting pay for those who shepherd only a few dozen lives at a time) there could be some (formal) acknowledgment of your well-stated opening: If a mental quirk arises, person could be temporarily be tasked with training others or similar tasks requiring experience of flying the actual hardware in use. Presuming that, in many cases an episode does not portend a declining spiral, is somewhat treatable--even within our current tenuous grasp of all such matters--formal recognition of this alternative could help lots.

Still, even were this method applied in good faith, there remains the prospect of no successful treatment, the only-delayed instant loss of all chops and income. More incentives? guaranteed pensioning off, with qualifications to address scamming. Consider thus: the Corporate expense of such a pension is trivial compared with [One mangled planeload.] Corporate must have this explained in language an MBA could comprehend, or any bright 12 yo. And that is not even snark/some are sociopaths themselves.

The obvious determinant of any solution to [perpetual] biped unpredictability is to use the fucking-money to ameliorate the pilot's sudden-death fiscally, encouraging self-reporting sans stigma ... and for Corporate to realize it's not only the humane solution, it's also the approach that places passengers in least *jeopardy. Translate the costs into the Liabilities of every (what's the TLA for piloting-direct-into-ground, again?) although there will be those because of weather and other conditions, not mental ones.

Airlines Could do this. Will they? ... Can we Make Them?


* Evading this dilemma with Stats is the natural inclination of every Biz-major, ever with eyes on the biggest prize: more-for-Me. aka What, me worry over an event every 5 years? 10 years?
(Same argument re cat rescue: why bother? when your piddling efforts can't alter millions of routinized executions, via percentages to 10 decimal places.)

But there's still the $Ms of hardware Loss and $Bs of Cost/per-dead-body:--THE PR--and the families in ever expanding circles. What is that Worth to a Corporation ..such as those we know?
(It's easy re the futility of cat rescue: THAT ONE gets to LIVE. And we humans get endorphins for realizing the fact and acting on it).

I'd bet that Corp shareholders/(screw the self-electing BODs) would support, by stock-purchase: this rationale as humane for the afflicted pilot/humane for the saving of even ONE-more mental-caused crash. And for being refreshing amidst the Crass-majority of Corps. Let's test that theory: doing $Well by Doing Good (but not as Tom Lehrer satire.)
New Well said. People do need alternatives rather than being kicked to the curb...
     Airbus - again. - (mmoffitt) - (71)
         It was an old plane -- 24 yo. - (a6l6e6x) - (3)
             That's not old. My airplane is 55 years old! -NT - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                 Yeah, but you don't go up to 40 K feet. - (a6l6e6x) - (1)
                     Well, if you're going to pick nits. ;0) - (mmoffitt)
         And Boeings never crash? - (pwhysall) - (36)
             Sure, but for fatal crashes Airbus wins! - (mmoffitt) - (35)
                 Mein Gott - (malraux)
                 What a massive margin of victory - (pwhysall) - (33)
                     Give Airbus a few more years, it'll be larger. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (32)
                         Will it double? - (pwhysall) - (31)
                             Will it matter? - (mmoffitt) - (30)
                                 Two. Millionths. Of. A. Percent. - (pwhysall) - (29)
                                     before or after you mined a nostril? -NT - (boxley) - (28)
                                         FOUR millionths of a percent! -NT - (pwhysall) - (27)
                                             thats not much of a booger :-) -NT - (boxley)
                                             Numbers-porn; you're usually not so easily deflected to the simplistic ploy. - (Ashton) - (25)
                                                 Hardware can't guarantee that one knows what the other is doing. - (Another Scott) - (14)
                                                     especially when one pilot is locked out the cockpit and the other has no response -NT - (boxley)
                                                     Coupled controls *do* help, though. - (mmoffitt) - (6)
                                                         [citation needed] - (pwhysall) - (5)
                                                             Read with comprehension much? - (mmoffitt) - (4)
                                                                 Just answer the question. - (pwhysall) - (3)
                                                                     Okay. I'll play. - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                                                                         Assertion. - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                                                             You brought up a question *I* did NOT make a comment about. -NT - (mmoffitt)
                                                     'The side stick vs yoke issue is red herring, IMO.' [Fail] - (Ashton) - (5)
                                                         Flying - no. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                                                             And doing that makes *all* the planes safer -NT - (drook)
                                                             Nobody's ever claimed that! - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                                                                 You did read the rest of my post, right? - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                                     So coupling the controls was too expensive? - (mmoffitt)
                                                 Appealing to facts not in evidence - (pwhysall) - (9)
                                                     You're in-lurve with modrin TLAs like "CRM"--as if That 'cooks the rice' - (Ashton) - (8)
                                                         Thought experiment - (drook) - (2)
                                                             Excellent point; shall need some pondering.. - (Ashton) - (1)
                                                                 Look at the latest research on self-driving cars - (drook)
                                                         OH NOES A MODERN TLA! IT MUST BE SHIT AND RUBBISH - (pwhysall) - (3)
                                                             Yep, two Boeings wrecked by a European. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                                                                 And this is why you fail. -NT - (pwhysall)
                                                             (The CRM idea isn't bollocks, of course) But as a deflection of this issue: - (Ashton)
                                                         Dupe - (pwhysall)
         Horrible image. - (mmoffitt)
         Pilot error indeed - (malraux) - (28)
             Guess he couldn't live with the fact he wasn't flying a Boeing -NT - (drook) - (26)
                 Errg. - (Another Scott) - (25)
                     an assumption is being made that he was unwilling to open he door, he may have been incapacitated -NT - (boxley) - (14)
                         The autopilot was set to an altitude of 100ft while the pilot was out. -NT - (malraux) - (1)
                             Re: The autopilot was set to an altitude of 100ft while the pilot was out. - (Nightowl)
                         That's possible, but unlikely here imo. - (mmoffitt) - (11)
                             from the latest news it appears that it was deliberate -NT - (boxley) - (10)
                                 Re: from the latest news it appears that it was deliberate - (Nightowl) - (9)
                                     I don't know how Europe does it. - (mmoffitt) - (8)
                                         His response was definitely career ending. -NT - (malraux) - (3)
                                             And an affirmation of the physician's finding. -NT - (mmoffitt)
                                             He wanted to go down in spectacular fashion and be remembered - (Nightowl)
                                             Ignore...dupe post. Sorry. -NT - (Nightowl)
                                         Doesn't matter much - (scoenye) - (3)
                                             Excellent points. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                 Share your unrealistic hopes.. because one. must. - (Ashton)
                                             Flying amortization -vs- Student Loans - (Ashton)
                     Could be you win the thread - (rcareaga) - (9)
                         That and being deemed unfit to fly. - (Nightowl)
                         There are more differences between how the Europeans do it and we than I realized. - (mmoffitt) - (7)
                             blame it on the nazis - (crazy) - (1)
                                 That's a tough one -NT - (drook)
                             NYT sez that.. some slack is cut though, even here. - (Ashton)
                             Zero tolerance is superficially appealing... - (pwhysall) - (3)
                                 This. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                     Alternates for pilots? - (Ashton) - (1)
                                         Well said. People do need alternatives rather than being kicked to the curb... -NT - (Another Scott)
             Eerie earlier crash. - (Another Scott)

Real classics should flash or jiggle or fade to black.
153 ms