Post #3,985
8/6/01 9:18:40 PM
|
Cackle... urp.. ssssss
OK Bill. If'n the Repos are a comin for me --
[Damn! maybe they are.. ZAlarm's been busier'n a one-armed bazooka operator on a slippery slope, while some ^*%#@#% AOL asshole looks for open ports]
You'd be good coverin my ass, while I aim the 160 dB 55 Hz generator at their anal sphincter - which tends to reduce motivation PDQ.
Trouble with all that cop equipment is, it leaves 'em rather unfixable. I'd rather keep 'em in condition to stand trial and live in the same cell with Bad-breath Bruno the Oedipus Queen of Block 51.
Patience is a virtue.
|
Post #3,987
8/6/01 9:47:51 PM
|
yea fusing would be a problem
dont forget the amon/cloral mix (dont experiment unless looking for a darwin award) as well as the oxy acyteline balloons for stun grenades. SAY! you got ociliscopes! any real big capacitors to go with? Gonna hafta peruse my "stinks" manual, makes me sigh for the old days. (SIGH)
thanx,
bill
Our bureaucracy and our laws have turned the world into a clean, safe work camp. We are raising a nation of slaves.
Chuck Palahniuk
|
Post #4,024
8/7/01 10:05:36 AM
|
55Hz?!?
I was always told the resonace freq. in questions was ~18Hz
Another urban legend?
jb4
(Resistance is not futile...)
|
Post #4,044
8/7/01 11:55:17 AM
|
8-9Hz is the proper freq...
...well below hearing. (Learned this from a sound expert when we were testing the range of my parimetric eq with a pink noise generator and some *really* good reference speakers)
By reference. The low E string on a normal electric bass guitar is ~40hz. The low B on 5 and 6 string basses comes in at ~30Hz. Human hearing usually stops at around 20Hz
Jay O'Connor
"Going places unmapped
to do things unplanned
to people unsuspecting"
|
Post #4,062
8/7/01 1:53:47 PM
|
Very low E
So a good doubler should make the 1st subharmonic of the bass's E string around 20Hz (the audible threshold), and that same doubler on a low B string should produce an inaudible subharmonic?
jb4
(Resistance is not futile...)
|
Post #4,065
8/7/01 1:59:02 PM
|
Yes, but...
...most speakers that can even reach 20hz flat have a serious db dropoff below 20 hz
Jay O'Connor
"Going places unmapped
to do things unplanned
to people unsuspecting"
|
Post #4,091
8/7/01 5:10:14 PM
|
The French did the research ~ '60s. Ethics quiz in box.
iirc. I saw pix, read articles.
~54 IS the res. freq. for (most) anal sphincters YMMV. And a hi-enough level WILL do exactly what you imagine.
Now for pretty-Quick death - prolly sweep from 50ish on down. Find res-freq. of adrenals, liver, heart etc. along the way. Shake loose and more. Just a matter of time/intensity chosen. There is NO credible data on the Gaussian spread, MLDs (min. lethal dose): for fucking Obvious reasons, I'd opine.
French built a battlefield weapon, a Medusa-headed monster capable of creating such levels. Probably killed a few cows, pigs, Murican tourists tryin ta touch the Mona Lisa's frame -- and other undesirables.
Prolly best forget conventional Helmholz resonators and variant 'speaker' transducer techno. Compressed air is the coupling, when at such humongous amplitudes. A size consideration, among others..
No, I haven't followed-up on 'progress' since. But simple physics shows it obviously possible, and how to do it. Where there's a will... (And we all know where the $ \ufffd are always spent FIRST: more effective killing.) It's virtually the Hallmark of our er civilizations. Resonance! - now we can kill with 'music' too. After all,
God is Love. And we surely are a God-ly People, to hear us tell about it..
Ashton
Ethics quiz: is it more merciful to kill millions slowly via Big-Mac ads with toys to lure kiddies and form their eating habits? or - to make Medusa-headed music-killers - which operate more er locally, but quicker?
Extra points for brevity & clarity, you lawstudents.
|
Post #4,093
8/7/01 5:14:57 PM
|
Once again the LRPD captures the essence..
Cry Havoc! and loose the Dogs of War
{sigh}
LRPD Lives!
|
Post #4,097
8/7/01 5:24:21 PM
|
Nope.
54Hz is way too high. There's too much happening in that range that if it was the range, you would see much more evidence.
According to [link|http://www.newphys.se/elektromagnum/physics/KeelyNet/flanagan/flan2.txt|this link] they pegged it about 13hz in a live situation in the 60s
Jay O'Connor
"Going places unmapped
to do things unplanned
to people unsuspecting"
|
Post #4,113
8/7/01 7:07:13 PM
|
Huh? Read first 2 \ufffd, one more time.
I *SAID* that 54 Hz was about the anal sphincter. "On down" MEANS:
Yes you must go lower to kill, though even 54 WILL KILL after sustained high exposure. There can be no *ONE* lethal exact frequency, though 7- 20 hertz is indeed ~the range the French mentioned for 'best results'. Obviously different, size, shape, age carbon units will react according to F=MA.
More detail would need experiment - an obvious difficulty.
As to relevance of the barium titanate folk and their investigations - some I read there, is uncomfortably reminiscent of long pseudo-science papers amongst acolytes. Measuring the energy of chakras .. is just one such phrase. Nothing I saw about 140+ dB audio for nefarious purposes. (And that damn well won't be 'capacitively coupled', either!)
I will accept that resonance implies: you stay at One freq. long enough to see IF it's doing the job. So a merely continuous-sweep gen, isn't a likely effective mode. But there is no "13.10371" Hz magic death frequency, however romantic be the idea.
(Hey I'm an Ex- audio consultant too - Marantz, Crown, Revox, Infinity yada yada. They paid me $ too. None of that lore scales well to *this topic*, y'know?)
A.
|
