IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 1
active user
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Politics Forum
/
The best part is...
Post #377,641
by
mmoffitt
7/6/13 11:39:29 AM
Reply
The best part is...
as heated as these threads can sometimes get, everyone comes back because for almost everyone, no matter how vehemently we disagree, we all afford each other a measure of respect.
Post #377,645
by
Another Scott
7/6/13 12:07:28 PM
Reply
Indeed!
Survey on DOMA.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (114)
- June 27, 2013, 07:49:05 AM EDT
Done.
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- June 27, 2013, 09:33:53 AM EDT
Done.
-NT
- (
hnick
)
- June 27, 2013, 10:03:41 AM EDT
Also done.
-NT
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- June 27, 2013, 11:40:40 AM EDT
Done also.
-NT
- (
a6l6e6x
)
- June 27, 2013, 12:09:21 PM EDT
Seriously done!
-NT
- (
folkert
)
- June 27, 2013, 02:37:54 PM EDT
Check
- (
drook
)
- (106)
- June 27, 2013, 02:46:20 PM EDT
Affects the tax base.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (11)
- June 27, 2013, 03:43:12 PM EDT
Bzzzzt, thank you for playing
- (
drook
)
- (9)
- June 27, 2013, 03:57:58 PM EDT
I think he means the actual case at hand.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (7)
- June 27, 2013, 04:42:29 PM EDT
That's *her* standing
- (
drook
)
- (6)
- June 27, 2013, 04:57:19 PM EDT
I think the argument is...
- (
Another Scott
)
- (5)
- June 27, 2013, 06:40:56 PM EDT
Even if true ...
- (
drook
)
- June 27, 2013, 06:50:15 PM EDT
That's as may be...
- (
malraux
)
- (3)
- June 27, 2013, 06:57:58 PM EDT
Now you're getting there. But, ...
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (2)
- June 28, 2013, 08:47:03 AM EDT
why pay a penalty for not being single?
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- (1)
- June 28, 2013, 10:17:22 AM EDT
There's a negative economic impact in cohabitation.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- June 28, 2013, 12:34:23 PM EDT
I was unclear.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- June 28, 2013, 08:50:39 AM EDT
costly to the taxpayer? It's not your money
- (
boxley
)
- June 27, 2013, 05:57:18 PM EDT
But it *will* affect you!
- (
pwhysall
)
- (6)
- June 28, 2013, 03:06:29 AM EDT
Are you SURE you don't live here?
- (
hnick
)
- (5)
- June 28, 2013, 06:24:16 AM EDT
Even up in the north...
- (
folkert
)
- (4)
- June 28, 2013, 09:21:50 AM EDT
Huh, wha? I've never been to the Netherlands!
-NT
- (
CRConrad
)
- (3)
- June 28, 2013, 07:04:07 PM EDT
Ummm...
- (
folkert
)
- (2)
- June 28, 2013, 08:13:54 PM EDT
I've never Reformed any Churchies either!
-NT
- (
CRConrad
)
- (1)
- June 28, 2013, 09:40:57 PM EDT
Jussa so's yews noes...
- (
folkert
)
- June 29, 2013, 02:15:07 AM EDT
WOW.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (86)
- June 28, 2013, 04:41:30 PM EDT
Um... Justice?
- (
hnick
)
- (85)
- June 28, 2013, 04:49:35 PM EDT
Nonsense. Did they have kids?
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (84)
- June 28, 2013, 04:59:30 PM EDT
Really?
- (
Another Scott
)
- (2)
- June 28, 2013, 05:12:19 PM EDT
Maybe in the short term.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (1)
- July 1, 2013, 06:01:47 PM EDT
The number you want is "new household formation".
- (
Another Scott
)
- July 1, 2013, 07:26:08 PM EDT
so you are one of them
- (
boxley
)
- June 28, 2013, 05:13:24 PM EDT
Re: Nonsense. Did they have kids?
- (
hnick
)
- (58)
- June 28, 2013, 06:13:14 PM EDT
Sans kids, what are the societal benefits of marriage?
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (57)
- July 1, 2013, 06:23:54 PM EDT
I remember arguing with Ben why atheists want to marry
- (
boxley
)
- (1)
- July 1, 2013, 07:15:48 PM EDT
Man, I am *NOT* making my point about marriage.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- July 1, 2013, 09:12:48 PM EDT
Re: Sans kids, what are the societal benefits of marriage?
- (
Another Scott
)
- (54)
- July 1, 2013, 07:38:37 PM EDT
So what?
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (53)
- July 1, 2013, 09:23:03 PM EDT
Re: So what?
- (
Another Scott
)
- (52)
- July 1, 2013, 09:34:21 PM EDT
:0)
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (51)
- July 1, 2013, 09:44:47 PM EDT
That's rough.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (50)
- July 1, 2013, 10:40:01 PM EDT
I don't think your marriage is a sham marriage.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (49)
- July 2, 2013, 06:37:02 PM EDT
How about mine?
- (
crazy
)
- (1)
- July 2, 2013, 08:14:52 PM EDT
No societal benefit != no benefit.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- July 2, 2013, 10:03:07 PM EDT
I wasn't pointing at you specifically.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (46)
- July 2, 2013, 08:56:31 PM EDT
No. Come on, Scott, have I really been that unclear?
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (45)
- July 2, 2013, 09:30:51 PM EDT
There's a difference between "expected" and "the purpose"
- (
drook
)
- (3)
- July 2, 2013, 09:37:48 PM EDT
Thank you.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (2)
- July 2, 2013, 09:48:12 PM EDT
I think it went off the rails here.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (1)
- July 2, 2013, 10:07:45 PM EDT
Yep, that was subjective.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- July 2, 2013, 10:10:26 PM EDT
We're talking past each other.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (40)
- July 2, 2013, 09:54:29 PM EDT
I think that's slightly disingenuous.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (39)
- July 2, 2013, 10:08:40 PM EDT
See above. I don't know how to say more...
-NT
- (
Another Scott
)
- (27)
- July 2, 2013, 10:10:15 PM EDT
Dude, Seriously?
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (26)
- July 2, 2013, 10:11:38 PM EDT
Expectations change.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (25)
- July 2, 2013, 10:34:23 PM EDT
An equal protection claim assumes the result.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (24)
- July 2, 2013, 10:56:56 PM EDT
you are confused
- (
boxley
)
- (1)
- July 2, 2013, 11:00:32 PM EDT
Yeah, I didn't get a call. Stupid b*stards. :0)
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- July 2, 2013, 11:02:29 PM EDT
BZZT - sorry, elementary logic lacking.
- (
CRConrad
)
- (21)
- July 3, 2013, 05:37:10 AM EDT
on A3) dont forget to steal all their stuff as well.
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- July 3, 2013, 08:35:59 AM EDT
First, I never said "reproduction was a requirement".
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (19)
- July 3, 2013, 01:21:10 PM EDT
On your addendum.
- (
Another Scott
)
- July 3, 2013, 03:04:01 PM EDT
Yes you did. But never mind that; let's talk people in stead
- (
CRConrad
)
- (17)
- July 3, 2013, 03:15:18 PM EDT
My last bit. A little clarification.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (16)
- July 6, 2013, 11:36:52 AM EDT
Wake up.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (9)
- July 6, 2013, 12:07:00 PM EDT
Racial discrimination is a different issue entirely.
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (7)
- July 6, 2013, 02:19:48 PM EDT
Equal protection is Equal protection. QED.
-NT
- (
Another Scott
)
- (6)
- July 6, 2013, 02:22:57 PM EDT
Can we discriminate against polygamists?
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (5)
- July 6, 2013, 02:54:28 PM EDT
Is polygamist marriage legal in the US?
- (
Another Scott
)
- (2)
- July 6, 2013, 03:10:21 PM EDT
How about Amendment 10?
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (1)
- July 6, 2013, 05:13:02 PM EDT
was legal in utah before statehood
- (
boxley
)
- July 6, 2013, 06:31:41 PM EDT
uh, no. Just wont allow them to get stamped by the gummint
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- (1)
- July 6, 2013, 05:01:37 PM EDT
Concur. The state no longer has an interest in marriage.
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- July 6, 2013, 05:14:31 PM EDT
Re: Wake up. ... Interesting that they cited Korematsu
- (
Ashton
)
- July 7, 2013, 05:08:00 AM EDT
A distinction without a difference.
- (
CRConrad
)
- (4)
- July 6, 2013, 06:34:26 PM EDT
And there it is.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (3)
- July 7, 2013, 01:06:17 PM EDT
Not assume, *declare*
- (
drook
)
- (2)
- July 7, 2013, 01:33:44 PM EDT
Oh, he won't answer this one
- (
crazy
)
- July 7, 2013, 03:59:28 PM EDT
Where and when was this declaration made?
- (
mmoffitt
)
- July 8, 2013, 01:25:35 PM EDT
Sorry, you still lost about six levels ago.
- (
CRConrad
)
- July 6, 2013, 07:21:49 PM EDT
state involvement in marriage was about division of property
- (
boxley
)
- (10)
- July 2, 2013, 10:50:48 PM EDT
Among DESCENDANTS, right?
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (2)
- July 2, 2013, 10:58:10 PM EDT
absolutely, now with dna you dont need contracts to
- (
boxley
)
- (1)
- July 2, 2013, 11:02:21 PM EDT
I'm with you.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- July 2, 2013, 11:03:39 PM EDT
<sigh>
- (
Another Scott
)
- (6)
- July 2, 2013, 11:10:31 PM EDT
why, I was right that time as well :-)
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- (1)
- July 3, 2013, 08:33:35 AM EDT
Heh. No. :-)
-NT
- (
Another Scott
)
- July 3, 2013, 08:55:09 AM EDT
How'd I miss that thread? ;0)
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (3)
- July 3, 2013, 01:14:14 PM EDT
Just lucky I guess.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (2)
- July 3, 2013, 02:49:15 PM EDT
The best part is...
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (1)
- July 6, 2013, 11:39:29 AM EDT
Indeed!
-NT
- (
Another Scott
)
- July 6, 2013, 12:07:28 PM EDT
Things we have: "adoption", "artificial insemination"...
- (
malraux
)
- (20)
- June 28, 2013, 06:41:46 PM EDT
Adoption and Artificial insemination rely on others.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (19)
- July 1, 2013, 06:25:23 PM EDT
"Zero chance" is BS
- (
malraux
)
- (18)
- July 1, 2013, 06:35:22 PM EDT
Drop it, it's not about sex
- (
drook
)
- (9)
- July 1, 2013, 07:09:21 PM EDT
He's only talking about the sex.
-NT
- (
CRConrad
)
- (8)
- July 1, 2013, 07:54:28 PM EDT
No, I'm not. Everyone else is.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (7)
- July 1, 2013, 08:50:17 PM EDT
now I'm confused
- (
boxley
)
- (1)
- July 1, 2013, 08:54:48 PM EDT
No.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- July 1, 2013, 09:14:23 PM EDT
Yes you are, of course. Straight hetero making-babies sex.
- (
CRConrad
)
- (4)
- July 2, 2013, 06:09:33 AM EDT
Um, No.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (3)
- July 2, 2013, 10:19:03 PM EDT
thats one convert :-)
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- July 2, 2013, 10:31:26 PM EDT
Succinct, sure -- but above all, WRONG.
- (
CRConrad
)
- (1)
- July 3, 2013, 01:27:28 AM EDT
I'm aware of the shady company I'm keeping.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- July 3, 2013, 01:29:11 PM EDT
I'll answer. Again.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (7)
- July 1, 2013, 09:32:42 PM EDT
what savings
- (
boxley
)
- (1)
- July 1, 2013, 11:18:39 PM EDT
I'm on your side.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- July 2, 2013, 09:52:52 PM EDT
That sounds convoluted and far-fetched.
- (
CRConrad
)
- (4)
- July 2, 2013, 05:57:34 AM EDT
no, he is pissed because he cant steal dead peoples money
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- July 2, 2013, 08:53:21 AM EDT
I'm a homophobe because I want ...
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (2)
- July 2, 2013, 09:39:01 PM EDT
Back-pedaling much?
- (
CRConrad
)
- (1)
- July 3, 2013, 04:40:44 AM EDT
If you change premises, you have to change conclusions.
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- July 3, 2013, 01:27:09 PM EDT
Done ... to a crisp.
- (
Ashton
)
- (1)
- June 27, 2013, 03:47:24 PM EDT
Methinks this thread (also) is done to a crisp.
- (
Ashton
)
- July 4, 2013, 12:51:22 AM EDT
i
we
they
.org
They just don't work, in the real world outside Gosling's beard.
95 ms