IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Politics Forum
/
The tyranny of the (legislative) majority in action!
Post #377,123
by
a6l6e6x
6/28/13 9:03:06 AM
Reply
The tyranny of the (legislative) majority in action!
Devious and gutless behavior as well.
Alex
Can someone tell me what the point of a referendum is?
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (37)
- June 26, 2013, 02:00:41 PM EDT
Ummm...
- (
folkert
)
- (1)
- June 26, 2013, 02:08:13 PM EDT
But then the state can decide not to enforce it.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- June 26, 2013, 02:17:20 PM EDT
depends, do you live in a direct democracy?
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- (4)
- June 26, 2013, 02:17:17 PM EDT
Nope. Depends if you have a dicatator.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (3)
- June 26, 2013, 02:27:27 PM EDT
the people could recall the executive and vote in someone
- (
boxley
)
- (1)
- June 26, 2013, 02:46:05 PM EDT
That's a nontrivial delay and having the people's will done.
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- June 27, 2013, 09:34:52 AM EDT
As I understand it...
- (
Another Scott
)
- June 26, 2013, 03:00:24 PM EDT
You seem unclear on the concept of limited government
- (
jake123
)
- (29)
- June 26, 2013, 04:41:42 PM EDT
You may be sure, but I'm hoping not.
-NT
- (
CRConrad
)
- June 26, 2013, 06:25:08 PM EDT
I'm familiar with the threat of the tyrrany of the majority.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (27)
- June 27, 2013, 09:10:11 AM EDT
That's not quite what I'm saying.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (16)
- June 27, 2013, 09:48:17 AM EDT
exactly, if the executive refuses to defend
- (
boxley
)
- June 27, 2013, 10:05:20 AM EDT
What's the difference?
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (14)
- June 27, 2013, 10:21:35 AM EDT
They said the district court ruling stands. It's decided.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (1)
- June 27, 2013, 10:58:34 AM EDT
Right. They decided not to decide if it was Constitutional.
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- June 27, 2013, 11:25:05 AM EDT
The difference is, he's not "The Decider".
- (
Another Scott
)
- (11)
- June 27, 2013, 12:10:16 PM EDT
But in effect he is.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (10)
- June 27, 2013, 12:46:35 PM EDT
you just figured that out now? :-)
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- June 27, 2013, 01:50:02 PM EDT
OTOH, it's been argued that they should do exactly that.
- (
CRConrad
)
- (8)
- June 28, 2013, 06:06:49 AM EDT
A contemporary example.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (1)
- June 28, 2013, 07:05:05 AM EDT
The tyranny of the (legislative) majority in action!
- (
a6l6e6x
)
- June 28, 2013, 09:03:06 AM EDT
No, I'm not.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (5)
- June 28, 2013, 08:40:33 AM EDT
you could always shoot im, long standing american tradition
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- (4)
- June 28, 2013, 10:22:43 AM EDT
Followed by that other long standing american tradition
- (
pwhysall
)
- (3)
- June 28, 2013, 10:24:18 AM EDT
Not quite
- (
drook
)
- (2)
- June 28, 2013, 10:53:49 AM EDT
More precisely, it's to see who runs out of money first.
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (1)
- June 28, 2013, 12:36:02 PM EDT
Ding ding ding...
- (
folkert
)
- June 28, 2013, 08:16:06 PM EDT
It works that way for all laws, no matter how passed
- (
crazy
)
- (9)
- June 27, 2013, 11:49:49 AM EDT
Counterpoint on that last bit by Kathleen Geier at WaMo.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (8)
- June 29, 2013, 10:56:52 PM EDT
I merely said I support him
- (
crazy
)
- (3)
- June 30, 2013, 04:31:33 PM EDT
Understood.
- (
Another Scott
)
- June 30, 2013, 06:11:51 PM EDT
Charlie on Christie's latest.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (1)
- Aug. 19, 2013, 10:08:22 PM EDT
Pathetic.. isn't it? [All ... ... now Years ... of it.]
-NT
- (
Ashton
)
- Aug. 20, 2013, 12:43:06 AM EDT
About that tunnel thing. Remember that?
- (
Another Scott
)
- (3)
- April 25, 2014, 06:48:03 PM EDT
Thanks.. for a whiff of actual comeuppance. Bye Christie
- (
Ashton
)
- April 27, 2014, 12:07:31 AM EDT
Christie thinks more cross-Hudson capacity may be needed...
- (
Another Scott
)
- (1)
- Jan. 3, 2015, 11:04:29 PM EST
It's time to refill the coffers.
- (
a6l6e6x
)
- Jan. 4, 2015, 12:17:41 PM EST
i
we
they
.org
On bassline: Martina Nav... Navri... gosh, I wish she'd get married.
53 ms