IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Politics Forum / Marriage is because syphillis? kewl :-)
Post #373,137
by boxley
3/29/13 4:44:13 PM
Reply
New Marriage is because syphillis? kewl :-)
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 57 years. meep
     ScotusBlog: USSC to punt on Prop 8 case. - (Another Scott) - (61) - March 26, 2013, 12:06:54 PM EDT
         no standing sounds like the correct legal ruling -NT - (boxley) - March 26, 2013, 12:49:15 PM EDT
         What century? - (mmoffitt) - (35) - March 27, 2013, 09:37:17 AM EDT
             Ok, it was a slight exaggeration. - (Another Scott) - (5) - March 26, 2013, 07:01:16 PM EDT
                 whats wrong with first cousins? looks around nervously -NT - (boxley) - (1) - March 26, 2013, 07:21:54 PM EDT
                     I figured someone would question that... - (Another Scott) - March 26, 2013, 07:55:52 PM EDT
                 Well, sometimes we do - (mhuber) - (2) - March 26, 2013, 08:34:53 PM EDT
                     I was best man in a Catholic marriage. - (Another Scott) - March 26, 2013, 08:46:17 PM EDT
                     I forgot to make my point - (mhuber) - March 26, 2013, 09:52:49 PM EDT
             Fundamental changes in the definition of marriage are good - (drook) - (27) - March 26, 2013, 09:06:47 PM EDT
                 :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - March 26, 2013, 09:43:40 PM EDT
                 + 11teen; almost forgot about TT! Thanx for reminder.. -NT - (Ashton) - March 27, 2013, 01:24:29 AM EDT
                 You're entitled to that view. - (mmoffitt) - (24) - March 27, 2013, 10:29:00 AM EDT
                     Its truly about "spousal" benefits. - (folkert) - (23) - March 27, 2013, 11:19:07 AM EDT
                         What rights does California deny same-sex couples? - (mmoffitt) - (22) - March 27, 2013, 11:55:26 AM EDT
                             Separate But Equal is not equal justice under law. - (Another Scott) - (21) - March 27, 2013, 12:13:57 PM EDT
                                 Thank you. I was going to trot that out. - (folkert) - (2) - March 27, 2013, 12:50:02 PM EDT
                                     Just at a semantic level - (drook) - (1) - March 27, 2013, 02:23:41 PM EDT
                                         Excellent point! -NT - (folkert) - March 27, 2013, 03:36:29 PM EDT
                                 Red Herring. - (mmoffitt) - (17) - March 27, 2013, 03:14:15 PM EDT
                                     Uhh ... no - (drook) - (6) - March 27, 2013, 05:31:39 PM EDT
                                         Actually, I do agree with your second sentence. - (mmoffitt) - (5) - March 28, 2013, 08:59:57 AM EDT
                                             Yes, but ... - (drook) - (3) - March 28, 2013, 09:53:49 AM EDT
                                                 It's really not that difficult. - (mmoffitt) - (2) - March 28, 2013, 10:19:02 AM EDT
                                                     Theory vs. practice - (drook) - (1) - March 28, 2013, 10:25:15 AM EDT
                                                         Lawyers - and I - would like that. - (mmoffitt) - March 28, 2013, 10:36:15 AM EDT
                                             Cool, I agree with you - (crazy) - March 28, 2013, 09:55:04 AM EDT
                                     Misinformed - (boxley) - (7) - March 27, 2013, 05:35:44 PM EDT
                                         There are corner cases where DNA is problematic. - (Another Scott) - March 27, 2013, 06:15:02 PM EDT
                                         If procreation isn't involved, why blood tests? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (5) - March 28, 2013, 09:04:50 AM EDT
                                             I'm not your lawyer - (crazy) - (4) - March 28, 2013, 09:46:11 AM EDT
                                                 A typically non-responsive response. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (3) - March 28, 2013, 09:46:29 AM EDT
                                                     kiss kiss - (crazy) - March 28, 2013, 09:56:35 AM EDT
                                                     And YOU responded it is not an issue in above post - (crazy) - (1) - March 28, 2013, 10:04:20 AM EDT
                                                         Heh. 2 more posts and still no answer to the question. -NT - (mmoffitt) - March 28, 2013, 10:20:06 AM EDT
                                     WTF???? Eugenics boards next? - (crazy) - (1) - March 28, 2013, 01:05:50 AM EDT
                                         Haven't you heard? - (mmoffitt) - March 28, 2013, 09:03:41 AM EDT
             maybe not to the euros normal in other cultures -NT - (boxley) - March 27, 2013, 09:43:13 AM EDT
         Mann at AngryBear says Goldstein at ScotusBlog is wrong. - (Another Scott) - (1) - March 27, 2013, 07:05:01 PM EDT
             interesting read - (boxley) - March 27, 2013, 09:39:50 PM EDT
         Tom Levenson's take at Balloon-Juice. - (Another Scott) - (21) - March 28, 2013, 07:29:29 PM EDT
             I hope that wasn't directed at me. - (mmoffitt) - (19) - March 29, 2013, 08:57:27 AM EDT
                 so she has to pay 350k because she was banging another chick - (boxley) - (3) - March 29, 2013, 09:38:26 AM EDT
                     I see a "wrong" compounded. - (mmoffitt) - (2) - March 29, 2013, 01:33:00 PM EDT
                         nope, you are not a racist, I get that - (boxley) - (1) - March 29, 2013, 01:41:00 PM EDT
                             s/stealing from rich/recovering stolen from/ -NT - (mmoffitt) - March 30, 2013, 10:50:45 AM EDT
                 Unfortunate fact of our legal system - (drook) - (10) - March 29, 2013, 09:41:24 AM EDT
                     Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott) - March 29, 2013, 10:48:48 AM EDT
                     You're almost too easy. Your link is sufficient. - (mmoffitt) - (8) - March 29, 2013, 01:01:53 PM EDT
                         Your "tradition" goes back ... three generations? - (drook) - (7) - March 29, 2013, 02:35:19 PM EDT
                             Ya lost me. - (mmoffitt) - (6) - March 29, 2013, 03:16:19 PM EDT
                                 Repeat after me: syphilis - (drook) - (5) - March 29, 2013, 04:20:54 PM EDT
                                     Marriage is because syphillis? kewl :-) -NT - (boxley) - March 29, 2013, 04:44:13 PM EDT
                                     Okay. - (mmoffitt) - (3) - March 30, 2013, 10:52:14 AM EDT
                                         Another slice off the shifting platform - (crazy) - March 30, 2013, 11:04:41 AM EDT
                                         Marriage leads to children != marriage is *for* children -NT - (drook) - (1) - March 30, 2013, 11:08:55 AM EDT
                                             Yup - (crazy) - March 30, 2013, 11:12:54 AM EDT
                 It was part of the discussion. - (Another Scott) - March 29, 2013, 10:51:14 AM EDT
                 I stopped reading at this point - (crazy) - (2) - March 29, 2013, 12:25:56 PM EDT
                     Zing. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - March 29, 2013, 01:02:40 PM EDT
                         Yup, thanks where he corrects you. AGAIN. - (crazy) - March 30, 2013, 11:14:48 AM EDT
             As to Why Marry? and ... it's All about the cheeldrun? - (Ashton) - March 29, 2013, 05:47:26 PM EDT

iwethey.org
A marvelous break-through in purest Digital-Think.
345 ms