You had us worried for a bit.
It really did seem like you might actually go underpants-on-head crazy and elect a multi-millionaire git. I only mention his multi-millionaire-ness trait as it's a significant factor in making him who he is - always been rich, never been poor; never had to endure or understand hardship of any kind. Even his draft-dodging "service" was to the loony Mormon church, not his country.
Interestingly, the MMG did well in the Southern states, amongst the kind of poor voters that the MMG wouldn't piss on if they were on fire. That's some impressive cognitive dissonance, there - "Sure, he hates us and anyone like us, and our interests are as far from his as it is possible to get, and his policies are gonna make our lives immeasurably worse, but he sure does love the baby jesus!"
Obama's not perfect, but Romney? What a truly awful individual. Further, I maintain that running a large commercial organisation doesn't necessarily give much useful experience applicable to running the country; after all, the US will never go broke (it's got a fiat currency, ffs), debt just doesn't work the same way for sovereign states as it does for commercial organisations, you can't fire the people who aren't pulling their weight, you can't offshore them, and you don't get to choose your customers.