Post #364,805
9/30/12 9:38:25 PM
|
Here's the thing:
As soon as I start accepting money for working on it, I become beholden to the people paying the money. Right now I can just say, meh, screw it, I've got better things to do. Or if I want to work on it some, I can pick what to work on, and how to do it.
Not that I couldn't use the income right now. I'm just not ready to go that far for it. ;-)
Regards, -scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
|
Post #364,807
9/30/12 10:12:02 PM
|
Re: Here's the thing:
On the verge of sounding dumb...
How is it me saying here take this money and make it work better, you being beholden to me.
I won't make payment requiring certain milestones. I'm not managing the project. I just saying... here, take my effing money and make this work better.
Even if you improve the thing in imperceptible ways (and YES, I'm a 100% kind of job of that type)... its still worth the friggin money to me.
You gotta remember, I'm all about working better... perhaps not functionality improvements, but work-ability means more to me than most.
|
Post #364,814
10/1/12 12:03:45 AM
|
Re: Here's the thing:
I believe that, over the past N number of years, Scott and I have shown an AMAZING unwillingness to take anyone's money for this site. At this point, it's a pet project; a side project. We both have other things that take up far more of our time, and I honestly don't think that either of us -- individually or together -- are willing, ready, or able to sink more time into the code for the foreseeable future.
It's not the world's greatest piece of forum software. But by and large, it works. And that's good enough.
-Mike
@MikeVitale42
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania
|
Post #364,815
10/1/12 12:07:53 AM
|
That is it.
I ain't gots no problem with it. Just making sure it wasn't anything else, as if it *WAS* a money thing... I'd make sure we could deal with it.
--
greg@gregfolkert.net
PGP key 1024D/B524687C 2003-08-05
Fingerprint: E1D3 E3D7 5850 957E FED0 2B3A ED66 6971 B524 687C
|
Post #364,817
10/1/12 1:51:58 AM
|
Were you ever going to put the source code up?
It is a rather unique piece of software, after all. I'd like to install it locally and see what I could do with it. (Probably sometime around 2015 when I find some copious free time.)
Wade.
|
Post #364,839
10/1/12 10:53:12 AM
|
One main problem:
Passwords. We need to scrub it first to make sure there isn't something tucked away.
Regards, -scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
|
Post #364,846
10/1/12 12:09:56 PM
|
Yeah yeah
Admit it, you've lost it.
And the source code.
ba-dum tish
Try the veal.
|
Post #364,847
10/1/12 12:12:11 PM
|
...
You here all week?
--
greg@gregfolkert.net
PGP key 1024D/B524687C 2003-08-05
Fingerprint: E1D3 E3D7 5850 957E FED0 2B3A ED66 6971 B524 687C
|
Post #364,856
10/1/12 1:39:36 PM
|
*ponders translating all of pwhysall's posts into boxlish...
Regards, -scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
|
Post #364,857
10/1/12 1:48:13 PM
|
Rhyming slang filter?
--
Drew
|
Post #364,858
10/1/12 1:57:59 PM
|
There's an idea...
But I'll have to make it read the posts aloud so Peter can be fully subjected to a Dick Van Dyke accent.
Regards, -scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
|
Post #364,866
10/1/12 4:56:52 PM
|
Oh dear oh dear... that old chestnut...
|