So, she should ...

Very bad medical symptom, with possible death in the future.
2 choices.
Ignore it and MAYBE you get better.
But maybe you DIE.
Diagnose and then treat, with a possible large financial hit.
Probability of living much higher, ie: the correct choice (for me).

Don't give me any crap about the money owed or the house lost. Yeah, sucks, BUT BETTER THAN DYING.

And to start off with, the initial tests might simply show something that can be either ignored or treated cheaply to start off with, but because she is delaying treatment, when she finally shows up at the emenrgency room it'll cost HUGE.

And at that point it will be her fault. YES! It Will.

BTW: I spent the final few months with my sister inlaw as she died an AGONIZING death. Lost my job over it when I refused to work from the funeral.

She ignored blood in the urine. Bladder cancer. Very treatable if caught on the first symptoms. Of course she ignored it. But when metasized, it became a death sentence, killing in about 3 months once it hits that stage.

Don't bother telling me I don't understand.

Post #360,856 by mmoffitt 7/16/12 4:16:05 PM Reply	So, she should ... lose her house, skip meals for her family, "go live in the woods", in short, become completely impoverished because she became ill. No wonder you like the PPACA. That attitude is explicit within it.
Post #360,861 by malraux 7/16/12 6:03:47 PM Reply	The PPACA is much better than nothing As previously discussed with respect to pre-existing conditions. Regards, -scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
Post #360,864 by mmoffitt 7/16/12 6:46:41 PM Reply	We'll see. I doubt it.
Post #360,912 by crazy 7/17/12 9:49:56 AM Reply	You did not read what I wrote Very bad medical symptom, with possible death in the future. 2 choices. Ignore it and MAYBE you get better. But maybe you DIE. Diagnose and then treat, with a possible large financial hit. Probability of living much higher, ie: the correct choice (for me). Don't give me any crap about the money owed or the house lost. Yeah, sucks, BUT BETTER THAN DYING. And to start off with, the initial tests might simply show something that can be either ignored or treated cheaply to start off with, but because she is delaying treatment, when she finally shows up at the emenrgency room it'll cost HUGE. And at that point it will be her fault. YES! It Will. BTW: I spent the final few months with my sister inlaw as she died an AGONIZING death. Lost my job over it when I refused to work from the funeral. She ignored blood in the urine. Bladder cancer. Very treatable if caught on the first symptoms. Of course she ignored it. But when metasized, it became a death sentence, killing in about 3 months once it hits that stage. Don't bother telling me I don't understand.

Welcome to IWETHEY!