Hmmmm . . . $80?

Post #359,023 by Andrew Grygus 6/16/12 10:11:04 PM Reply	Hmmmm . . . $80? There are already some law suits out there based on rapid decline of light output from LEDs. No, I'm going to wait a while before investing in those to see how it shakes out. They all require replacing fixtures too. I have used curly fluorescents in some locations for at least 15 years, but they are locations where light quality and dimability are not important to me (5 locations). But yes, 200 watts per fixture. Kitchen, office, bathroom, bedroom and dining room. One ceiling fixture in each room (hanging lamps in the dining room). I consider that the bare minimum illumination to work in those rooms (and the ceilings and walls are all painted bright white to maximize light).
Post #359,024 by malraux 6/16/12 10:16:59 PM Reply	Our kitchen: 10 50W halogen can lights, plus a 120W overhead, plus under-cabinet fluorescents (4 or 5 at 8W ea? can't remember). 2 of the 50Ws are over the desk, 2 over the oven space, and the rest over the counters. 200 watts would definitely be bare minimum in a kitchen. Regards, -scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
Post #359,025 by Andrew Grygus 6/16/12 11:12:39 PM Reply	Well, I also have . . . . . another ceiling fixture with a curly fluorescent in it, but it's rarely turned on because that side of the kitchen is storage. Since walls, ceilings and cabinets are bright white it gets enough light. I turn it on only when I need to read small print at the phone.
Post #359,029 by crazy 6/17/12 12:07:55 AM Reply	I suspect you'd REALLY like a couple of these bulbs Ceramic Metal Halide Best full spectrum bulb available and MORE efficient than CFL. http://www.google.co...amic+metal+halide But you are to (hmm) frugal to get one. Go sit under one and read a book for a few minutes or work on some tight electronics and you will see the benefit. You too Box. I'm thinking of putting one over the fish pond for my evening entertainment.
Post #359,030 by Andrew Grygus 6/17/12 12:25:47 AM Reply	How well do they meet the dimmable part of the spec? Warm-up time? If I want bright, I've got an 85-Watt curly fluorescent photo lamp (equiv 300-Watt incandescent). Not dimmable, but pretty much instant on at least.
Post #359,033 by crazy 6/17/12 8:31:24 AM Reply	None No dimming. And warmup is about 5 minutes. And yes, they need a special ballast. They are not a general replacement as people are trying to get you to do. I'm simply pointing out there are non-standard light sources that most people don't deal with, yet the spectrucm they provide is far better than what most people live under. In this house, the guy went all out on a variety of lights, so I got choices.

Welcome to IWETHEY!