Too late. We were the first. And the second.

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #354,349 by mmoffitt 2/17/12 10:09:32 AM Reply	Too late. We were the first. And the second.
Post #354,355 by crazy 2/17/12 11:29:02 AM Reply	Huh? Yeah, 70 years ago (or so) So what. On this go around, who's gonna be 1st?
Post #354,358 by jake123 2/17/12 12:19:25 PM Reply	Not really the same thing The US was in no danger of reprisal for the nukes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki... so, in no way could it have been considered a suicide bombing. However, I'm pretty sure that even the most god-bothered mullah in Tehran realises that lobbing a nuke into Israel will result in every major city in Iran being turned into a glass parking lot. I think it's a lot more likely that Israel will start lobbing rocks, given that currently they're in a similar position to Iran that the US was wrt Japan in 1945.

Interesting point - (crazy) - (8) - Feb. 17, 2012, 04:54:51 AM EST

Too late. We were the first. And the second. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Feb. 17, 2012, 10:09:32 AM EST

Huh? Yeah, 70 years ago (or so) - (crazy) - (1) - Feb. 17, 2012, 11:29:02 AM EST

Not really the same thing - (jake123) - Feb. 17, 2012, 12:19:25 PM EST

must be an old article - (boxley) - (4) - Feb. 17, 2012, 11:28:23 PM EST

Thailand wasn't nukes - (crazy) - (3) - Feb. 18, 2012, 08:10:22 AM EST

Maybe, maybe not. - (Another Scott) - Feb. 18, 2012, 11:23:33 AM EST

not entirely - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 18, 2012, 12:23:34 PM EST

No, it was NOT on purpose - (crazy) - Feb. 18, 2012, 04:36:21 PM EST

Compatible with our orbiting brain lasers.
68 ms