"Like any other normal couple"? - (mmoffitt) - (68) - Nov. 14, 2011, 01:46:13 PM EST
         Yeah, why not? -NT - (drook) - (53) - Nov. 14, 2011, 02:05:09 PM EST
             Normal Couple? - (mmoffitt) - (52) - Nov. 14, 2011, 03:00:50 PM EST
                 Re: Normal Couple? - (pwhysall) - (49) - Nov. 14, 2011, 03:04:57 PM EST
                     "Normal" couple != "Normal couple". - (mmoffitt) - (48) - Nov. 14, 2011, 03:25:33 PM EST
                         Gay is perfectly natural. - (pwhysall) - (21) - Nov. 14, 2011, 03:42:21 PM EST
                             Being Black or White is not behavior. - (mmoffitt) - (20) - Nov. 14, 2011, 04:51:09 PM EST
                                 Two things - (drook) - (13) - Nov. 14, 2011, 04:57:11 PM EST
                                     That's an argument I'm not making. - (mmoffitt) - (10) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:11:09 PM EST
                                         So, mmoffitt... - (rcareaga) - (5) - Nov. 15, 2011, 01:25:58 AM EST
                                             Assuming your facts. - (mmoffitt) - (4) - Nov. 15, 2011, 08:23:08 AM EST
                                                 and yet, there seems something else at work here - (rcareaga) - (3) - Nov. 15, 2011, 10:13:35 AM EST
                                                     There may be something else, I'll grant. - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Nov. 15, 2011, 11:25:46 AM EST
                                                         Nah. - (rcareaga) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2011, 03:37:57 PM EST
                                                             In general, I do find public displays inappropriate. - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 15, 2011, 03:53:03 PM EST
                                         you have to get to 50% to be normal. - (boxley) - (3) - Nov. 15, 2011, 09:34:53 AM EST
                                             Not what I said. And you know it. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2011, 10:05:24 AM EST
                                                 No, that's *exactly* what you said -NT - (drook) - Nov. 15, 2011, 10:28:40 AM EST
                                             You deviate you -NT - (crazy) - Nov. 15, 2011, 12:09:28 PM EST
                                     It used to be - (scoenye) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2011, 07:13:56 PM EST
                                         Yup, my mother went to Catholic school - (drook) - Nov. 15, 2011, 08:02:13 AM EST
                                 No, it's an insult when claimed something isn't normal - (crazy) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:00:49 PM EST
                                     Re: No, it's an insult when claimed something isn't normal - (beepster) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:07:26 PM EST
                                         Time and demographics - (crazy) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:15:53 PM EST
                                 So... - (folkert) - Nov. 14, 2011, 10:51:05 PM EST
                                 re: It's an abuse of the word normal - (altmann) - (1) - Nov. 16, 2011, 02:55:49 AM EST
                                     :0) -NT - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 16, 2011, 08:03:29 AM EST
                         gasp - (beepster) - Nov. 14, 2011, 03:47:14 PM EST
                         Are American Indians "deviant"? - (drook) - (22) - Nov. 14, 2011, 03:58:52 PM EST
                             It's called English. And I know how to use it. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (21) - Nov. 14, 2011, 04:40:51 PM EST
                                 Yup. Inflammatorily - (crazy) - (20) - Nov. 14, 2011, 04:48:13 PM EST
                                     Um, no. - (mmoffitt) - (13) - Nov. 14, 2011, 04:53:19 PM EST
                                         Re: Um, no. - (beepster) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2011, 04:59:17 PM EST
                                             Forgive for being "textbook correct". :0) - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:02:30 PM EST
                                         Yes, there is a dispute - (drook) - (10) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:00:00 PM EST
                                             So, your conjecture is... - (mmoffitt) - (9) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:04:38 PM EST
                                                 Enjoy - (crazy) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:09:33 PM EST
                                                 DING! - (drook) - (7) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:10:23 PM EST
                                                     Consequence of the argument you made. - (mmoffitt) - (6) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:12:53 PM EST
                                                         Here, a quiz for you - (crazy) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:14:20 PM EST
                                                         Still framing it as "behavior" ... still wrong -NT - (drook) - (4) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:14:41 PM EST
                                                             The existence of the species tells me I'm right. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (3) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:16:38 PM EST
                                                                 Go read my book quote - (crazy) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:20:06 PM EST
                                                                     Re: Go read my book quote - (beepster) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:39:41 PM EST
                                                                         Easy googleable targets get knocked down -NT - (crazy) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:58:52 PM EST
                                     Re: Yup. Inflammatorily - (beepster) - (5) - Nov. 14, 2011, 04:57:20 PM EST
                                         B.S. - (mmoffitt) - (4) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:00:45 PM EST
                                             see my other post. -NT - (beepster) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:02:07 PM EST
                                             "accepted" - (drook) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:13:40 PM EST
                                                 The species. HTH. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2011, 08:31:18 AM EST
                                                     You asked it? -NT - (drook) - Nov. 15, 2011, 08:34:40 AM EST
                         You're applying statistical definitions... - (static) - Nov. 14, 2011, 06:59:08 PM EST
                         yes normal - (boxley) - Nov. 14, 2011, 09:08:38 PM EST
                 Human sexuality is powerful and erratic. - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2011, 01:24:25 AM EST
                     There's a reason they call it "vanilla". - (static) - Nov. 15, 2011, 04:51:15 AM EST
         It really depends on how you read that, doesn't it? - (Another Scott) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2011, 08:03:54 PM EST
             It's much more fun to use technically accurate, loaded words - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2011, 08:29:57 AM EST
                 Project much? -NT - (drook) - Nov. 15, 2011, 08:35:18 AM EST
         Took a day, but I figured out the problem - (drook) - (10) - Nov. 15, 2011, 09:17:18 PM EST
             no boggle zone? cmon, mikey can boggle and we can educate - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2011, 09:25:05 PM EST
                 Hmmmmm. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 16, 2011, 08:05:20 AM EST
             I thought it was just a boring problem of definition. -NT - (static) - Nov. 15, 2011, 09:45:59 PM EST
             wrong on one count - (beepster) - (2) - Nov. 15, 2011, 11:13:39 PM EST
                 Which SW has already admitted to being wrong about - (crazy) - (1) - Nov. 16, 2011, 05:29:24 AM EST
                     right, wrong dont matter - (beepster) - Nov. 16, 2011, 05:57:54 AM EST
             I took a few days, too. - (mmoffitt) - (3) - Nov. 17, 2011, 10:40:20 AM EST
                 This is why scientists can't do politics - (drook) - (2) - Nov. 17, 2011, 10:03:13 AM EST
                     Right - that's the real problem. - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 17, 2011, 10:15:14 AM EST
                     Re: This is why scientists can't do politics - (pwhysall) - Nov. 17, 2011, 10:22:08 AM EST