Can't cut and paste from pdf

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #348,470 by beepster 9/30/11 8:22:49 PM Reply	Can't cut and paste from pdf First paragraph page 82 Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
Post #348,528 by S1mon_Jester 10/1/11 10:10:29 PM Reply	Here is your quote. The ecclesiastical courts applied the canon law, a subcategory of the Civil Law as defined. These courts dealt with the clergy and personal matters including matrimony and probate. While the jurisdiction of the ecclesiastical courts was eventually transferred to the common law courts in the 19th century, the canon law influenced equity before then,which, in turn, later became a part of the Common Law. A few thoughts. 1) Roman Law != Canon Law. 2) I am not willing to concede that Canon Law is the basis of Common Law. I will, however, concede that Canon Law influenced Common Law. (Canon law include laws of matrimony and probate after all, and these areas were originally outside the King's dominion. However, influence is slippery term. Certainly Canon Law influenced Henry VIII decision - but I'm not sure I'd argue that that they were based of Canon Law. :-)
Post #348,529 by beepster 10/1/11 10:57:24 PM Reply	Concession My first post was too broad, should have.said canon law was influential, but not "the" basis. In the areas under discussion in this thread, it was the basis...but not overall. Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.

why am I not surprised - (boxley) - (92) - Sept. 28, 2011, 12:29:33 PM EDT

Re: why am I not surprised - (beepster) - (88) - Sept. 28, 2011, 01:12:43 PM EDT

Binary Man continues to be Binary. :-/ -NT - (Another Scott) - (87) - Sept. 28, 2011, 01:43:33 PM EDT

Please enlighten me about how you perceive this as binary? - (beepster) - (86) - Sept. 28, 2011, 02:42:03 PM EDT

Re: Please enlighten me about how you perceive this as binar - (Another Scott) - (85) - Sept. 28, 2011, 03:11:53 PM EDT

Ok - (beepster) - (84) - Sept. 28, 2011, 03:41:06 PM EDT

Re: Ok - (beepster) - (83) - Sept. 28, 2011, 05:30:21 PM EDT

Re: Ok - (Another Scott) - (82) - Sept. 28, 2011, 05:56:12 PM EDT

Oh, I get it - (beepster) - (81) - Sept. 28, 2011, 06:27:23 PM EDT

Binary Man continues to be Binary. - (Another Scott) - (80) - Sept. 28, 2011, 07:25:07 PM EDT

Hmmm. No evidence, no med diagnosis to support - (beepster) - (79) - Sept. 28, 2011, 10:17:01 PM EDT

As usual - (crazy) - (78) - Sept. 29, 2011, 07:36:38 AM EDT

Re: As usual - (beepster) - (77) - Sept. 29, 2011, 07:42:34 AM EDT

Whoa, "more tolerant"? - (crazy) - (1) - Sept. 29, 2011, 10:55:42 PM EDT

dont forget dessicated porcupines :-) -NT - (boxley) - Sept. 29, 2011, 08:23:16 PM EDT

And as far as tolerance: - (crazy) - (58) - Sept. 29, 2011, 08:03:09 AM EDT

Well then - (beepster) - (57) - Sept. 29, 2011, 09:34:47 AM EDT

You don't get to own the word. - (crazy) - (28) - Sept. 29, 2011, 09:58:41 AM EDT

My statements? - (beepster) - (27) - Sept. 29, 2011, 10:45:31 AM EDT

Path of least resistance? - (crazy) - (26) - Sept. 29, 2011, 12:07:20 PM EDT

Hmm. You appear to not be paying attention. - (beepster) - (25) - Sept. 29, 2011, 12:17:20 PM EDT

Marriage - (crazy) - (24) - Sept. 29, 2011, 12:30:25 PM EDT

Can't believe this - (beepster) - (23) - Sept. 29, 2011, 12:37:53 PM EDT

And neither does anyone else - (crazy) - (22) - Sept. 29, 2011, 10:32:02 PM EDT

Sure appears that way - (beepster) - (21) - Sept. 30, 2011, 08:31:38 AM EDT

Ah, me idiot - (crazy) - (20) - Sept. 30, 2011, 10:30:20 AM EDT

I don't need to re-read - (beepster) - (19) - Sept. 30, 2011, 10:41:47 AM EDT

Hmm, I thought our laws were dervied from English common law - (Another Scott) - (18) - Sept. 30, 2011, 11:26:10 AM EDT

dig deeper - (beepster) - (17) - Sept. 30, 2011, 11:33:51 AM EDT

I think I can make the argument - (S1mon_Jester) - (16) - Sept. 30, 2011, 11:40:07 AM EDT

Yup - (crazy) - (7) - Sept. 30, 2011, 11:41:32 AM EDT

Know what. - (beepster) - (6) - Sept. 30, 2011, 12:09:39 PM EDT

Very good example - (crazy) - (4) - Sept. 30, 2011, 12:16:05 PM EDT

Of what, exactly. - (beepster) - (3) - Sept. 30, 2011, 12:18:28 PM EDT

If you say so - (crazy) - (2) - Sept. 30, 2011, 12:22:36 PM EDT

There's an accusation now? - (beepster) - (1) - Sept. 30, 2011, 12:34:57 PM EDT

Easily - (crazy) - Sept. 30, 2011, 06:44:22 PM EDT

Hey, I'm a canon law scholar now, yay - (crazy) - Sept. 30, 2011, 12:18:34 PM EDT

That would all be well and good. - (beepster) - (7) - Sept. 30, 2011, 12:12:20 PM EDT

Not sure it is. - (S1mon_Jester) - (6) - Sept. 30, 2011, 05:20:53 PM EDT

Thank you. -NT - (Another Scott) - Sept. 30, 2011, 05:26:19 PM EDT

Re: Not sure it is. - (beepster) - (4) - Sept. 30, 2011, 06:47:33 PM EDT

Actually, if you read carefully... - (S1mon_Jester) - (3) - Sept. 30, 2011, 07:48:38 PM EDT

Can't cut and paste from pdf - (beepster) - (2) - Sept. 30, 2011, 08:22:49 PM EDT

Here is your quote. - (S1mon_Jester) - (1) - Oct. 1, 2011, 10:10:29 PM EDT

Concession - (beepster) - Oct. 1, 2011, 10:57:24 PM EDT

Also, you STOLE the word and the concept - (crazy) - (14) - Sept. 29, 2011, 10:12:33 AM EDT

>I< didn't do anything - (beepster) - (13) - Sept. 29, 2011, 10:47:46 AM EDT

Sure, when your people killed off the competition - (crazy) - (12) - Sept. 29, 2011, 11:52:19 AM EDT

You mean, like Islam? - (beepster) - (11) - Sept. 29, 2011, 11:59:48 AM EDT

Sure - (crazy) - (1) - Sept. 29, 2011, 12:10:39 PM EDT

ICLRPD - (rcareaga) - Sept. 29, 2011, 05:04:59 PM EDT

Interesting side track - (crazy) - (8) - Sept. 29, 2011, 11:21:02 PM EDT

You disavow your own arguments so easily - (beepster) - (7) - Sept. 30, 2011, 08:47:25 AM EDT

"intolerant" - (crazy) - (6) - Sept. 30, 2011, 10:29:04 AM EDT

to what point and to what end - (beepster) - (5) - Sept. 30, 2011, 10:29:44 AM EDT

No, I'm not - (crazy) - (4) - Sept. 30, 2011, 10:41:27 AM EDT

Wrong, and there you go again - (beepster) - (3) - Sept. 30, 2011, 10:49:32 AM EDT

Good - (crazy) - (2) - Sept. 30, 2011, 10:50:55 AM EDT

Who? - (beepster) - (1) - Sept. 30, 2011, 11:00:59 AM EDT

I had the same decision - (crazy) - Sept. 30, 2011, 11:36:55 AM EDT

"Separate but equal" doesn't work. We tried that. - (Another Scott) - (12) - Sept. 29, 2011, 12:14:14 PM EDT

You are missing the point to..so let me be clear - (beepster) - (11) - Sept. 29, 2011, 12:35:12 PM EDT

Nice try. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Sept. 29, 2011, 12:42:39 PM EDT

Re: Nice try. - (beepster) - (1) - Sept. 29, 2011, 05:18:20 PM EDT

Why does it matter? -NT - (crazy) - Sept. 29, 2011, 11:16:33 PM EDT

better yet, no need for a state marriage license at all - (boxley) - (7) - Sept. 29, 2011, 08:27:00 PM EDT

Agreed -NT - (crazy) - (6) - Sept. 29, 2011, 10:51:38 PM EDT

Argh - (beepster) - (5) - Sept. 30, 2011, 08:51:13 AM EDT

No, I want it at the FEDERAL level - (crazy) - (4) - Sept. 30, 2011, 10:10:14 AM EDT

Go back and read, butthead - (beepster) - (3) - Sept. 30, 2011, 10:39:35 AM EDT

The single word matters - (crazy) - (2) - Sept. 30, 2011, 10:49:51 AM EDT

no, actually it doesn't. - (beepster) - (1) - Sept. 30, 2011, 10:55:34 AM EDT

Of course not - to you - (crazy) - Sept. 30, 2011, 11:46:07 AM EDT

Well, a little off there... - (S1mon_Jester) - (15) - Sept. 29, 2011, 11:51:32 AM EDT

Re: Well, a little off there... - (beepster) - (14) - Sept. 29, 2011, 12:03:48 PM EDT

I like irony. I'm ok with that - (crazy) - Sept. 29, 2011, 12:24:09 PM EDT

Really, you haven't heard of Richard Cohen? - (S1mon_Jester) - (12) - Sept. 30, 2011, 11:03:46 AM EDT

Hmm - (beepster) - (11) - Sept. 30, 2011, 11:09:34 AM EDT

Nope. - (S1mon_Jester) - (10) - Sept. 30, 2011, 11:12:50 AM EDT

NO IT WAS NOT - (beepster) - (9) - Sept. 30, 2011, 11:22:26 AM EDT

My apologies - your argument was that - (S1mon_Jester) - (8) - Sept. 30, 2011, 11:37:50 AM EDT

He doesn't do that - (crazy) - Sept. 30, 2011, 11:43:37 AM EDT

Ask youself - (beepster) - (6) - Sept. 30, 2011, 12:20:33 PM EDT

Apparently not acceptable to you... - (S1mon_Jester) - (5) - Sept. 30, 2011, 04:53:47 PM EDT

Well then, - (beepster) - (4) - Sept. 30, 2011, 06:38:52 PM EDT

Tough when you don't understand the culture -NT - (crazy) - (3) - Sept. 30, 2011, 06:48:08 PM EDT

You proven only one thing here - (beepster) - (2) - Sept. 30, 2011, 06:56:52 PM EDT

Such a surprise - (crazy) - (1) - Sept. 30, 2011, 08:25:34 PM EDT

You had an argument with yourself - (beepster) - Sept. 30, 2011, 08:31:55 PM EDT

Re: why am I not surprised - (pwhysall) - Sept. 28, 2011, 02:15:44 PM EDT

It was pretty inevitable - (jay) - Sept. 28, 2011, 03:40:14 PM EDT

If one has the patience.. - (Ashton) - Sept. 28, 2011, 08:43:03 PM EDT

iwethey.org

Ichi, ni, san, shi.
86 ms