Welcome to IWETHEY!
Post #34,722
4/8/02 1:33:16 PM
|
Practical problem: who raises the children?
|
Post #34,729
4/8/02 1:50:48 PM
|
And do you toilet or litter box train them?
|
Post #34,730
4/8/02 1:54:14 PM
|
Toilet, of course
See [link|http://www.karawynn.net/mishacat/toilet.shtml|here]
=== I can't be a Democrat because I like to spend the money I make. I can't be a Republican because I like to spend the money I make on drugs and whores.
|
Post #34,742
4/8/02 3:06:23 PM
|
Since this is Politics: what could you do if you found out
that one kid-kitten was becoming a Republican?
|
Single mothers should get themselves a husband!
- (
Brandioch)
- (19)
- April 4, 2002, 06:48:59 PM EST
There's an obvious explanation, though:
- (
Ashton)
- (1)
- April 4, 2002, 07:10:41 PM EST
Remember his last attempt?
- (
Brandioch)
- April 4, 2002, 07:45:37 PM EST
Turning back the clock...
- (
slugbug)
- (3)
- April 4, 2002, 07:47:36 PM EST
On a tangent...
- (
Meerkat)
- April 5, 2002, 12:54:08 AM EST
If a grad student in 'government' made such a proposal
- (
Ashton)
- April 5, 2002, 04:49:33 AM EST
I think it is a reaction to the 60's welfare programs
- (
boxley)
- April 5, 2002, 10:12:33 AM EST
At least eliminate the "single incentives"
- (
SpiceWare)
- April 4, 2002, 10:27:48 PM EST
I know I'm reaching but.....
- (
Silverlock)
- (10)
- April 4, 2002, 10:51:24 PM EST
They can't afford to admit that
- (
drewk)
- (9)
- April 5, 2002, 09:38:06 AM EST
Ditto.
- (
Brandioch)
- (8)
- April 5, 2002, 10:01:49 AM EST
But, the state governments do care who you marry.
- (
a6l6e6x)
- (1)
- April 5, 2002, 03:17:34 PM EST
As long as they can legally enter into a contract.
- (
Brandioch)
- April 5, 2002, 04:30:23 PM EST
Marrying a cat
- (
ben_tilly)
- (5)
- April 6, 2002, 05:07:17 AM EST
That's got to be the ultimate "out of context" quote
-NT
- (
drewk)
- April 8, 2002, 09:55:59 AM EDT
Practical problem: who raises the children?
-NT
- (
Ashton)
- (3)
- April 8, 2002, 01:33:16 PM EDT
And do you toilet or litter box train them?
-NT
- (
bbronson)
- (2)
- April 8, 2002, 01:50:48 PM EDT
Toilet, of course
- (
drewk)
- (1)
- April 8, 2002, 01:54:14 PM EDT
Since this is Politics: what could you do if you found out
- (
Ashton)
- April 8, 2002, 03:06:23 PM EDT
Why should they?
- (
orion)
- April 6, 2002, 03:52:15 PM EST
Remember, people in 1900 didn't know what an atom was. They didn't know its structure.
They also didn't know what a radio was, or an airport, or a movie, or a television, or a computer, or a cell phone, or a jet, an antibiotic, a rocket, a satellite, an MRI, ICU, IUD, IBM, IRA, ERA, EEG, EPA, IRS, DOD, PCP, HTML, internet. interferon, instant replay, remote sensing, remote control, speed dialing, gene therapy, gene splicing, genes, spot welding, heat-seeking, bipolar, prozac, leotards, lap dancing, email, tape recorder, CDs, airbags, plastic explosive, plastic, robots, cars, liposuction, transduction, superconduction, dish antennas, step aerobics, smoothies, twelve-step, ultrasound, nylon, rayon, teflon, fiber optics, carpal tunnel, laser surgery, laparoscopy, corneal transplant, kidney transplant, AIDS... None of this would have meant anything to a person in the year 1900. They wouldn't know what you are talking about.
134 ms