IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New The problem with that argument
It sounds entirely reasonable. "Okay, maybe the rich should be paying a bit more. But people making $250k aren't rich, they're people who busted their asses to get where they are."

Yup, that may be true. But if anyone concedes that point and says, "Sure, let's start at a million," then you know as well as I do the TP-ers will say that those people are hard working small business owners. And if you move it to 10 million then those people will be "job creators".

TP-ers don't want to compromise. Take one step in their direction and they back up two more steps.

At this point the president should just shoot for rolling back the Bush tax cuts entirely. If that means people making $200k and above take a hit, so be it.
--

Drew
New the tpers can't drive the bus
there aren't enough of them.

And you take EVERYONE ELSE, general republicans included, and marginalize them.

Rolling back the bush tax cuts entirely hits EVERYBODY, not just those making over 200k. Might not be a horrible idea...but try and get that through ;-)

Hell, with the dems offering plans that cut next to nothing and voting in block against the repo plan which isn't much better...maybe by this time next week we'll be bankrupt and sell ourselves to the Chinese for pennies on the dollar.

Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
New That explains why Boehner got the bill passed last night
--

Drew
New getting zero dems helps that cause along quite well.
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
New Having the majority is rough, isn't it?
New not particularly.
but I notice no uproar any longer about block no voting by a single party, do I?

Bueller?
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
New [sigh] There *is* a difference
When the majority says openly that their #1 priority is making Obama a one-term president, and their action confirm they don't give a shit what they blow up or who gets hurt along the way, then yeah, I have no problem with opposing that.
--

Drew
New no there is not
except in your head.
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
New You're actually a 'bot, aren't you. <sigh>
New well...
...maybe on this one instance of a vote I'll forgive. problem is, though, it's been happening pretty much since the change. Silence.

This time, they're fighting the good fight for their beliefs.

Also convenient that y'all like this side better than the others.

As church lady says...isn't that >convenient<
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
New So you're saying
that the Democrats are using the same tactics as Republicans?
New Of course he is
that way he can easily rationalize the false equality of responsibility for the debt crisis. RepubliCANTS are totally responsible for this false crisis that they have manufactured to give them the opportunity to shove their ideology down the throats of Americans, who would never let such crap occur if they tried this under a different political scenario.




"Chicago to my mind was the only place to be. ... I above all liked the city because it was filled with people all a-bustle, and the clatter of hooves and carriages, and with delivery wagons and drays and peddlers and the boom and clank of freight trains. And when those black clouds came sailing in from the west, pouring thunderstorms upon us so that you couldn't hear the cries or curses of humankind, I liked that best of all. Chicago could stand up to the worst God had to offer. I understood why it was built--a place for trade, of course, with railroads and ships and so on, but mostly to give all of us a magnitude of defiance that is not provided by one house on the plains. And the plains is where those storms come from."

-- E.L. Doctorow
     Poor bastards - (drook) - (84)
         Right. - (beepster) - (25)
             Non sequitur, as usual. -NT - (Another Scott) - (22)
                 really? - (beepster) - (21)
                     Where? -NT - (Another Scott) - (20)
                         I think he's looking here - (S1mon_Jester) - (19)
                             Re: I think he's looking here - (malraux) - (18)
                                 The whining that the rich have been doing for a few years - (jake123)
                                 Dammit, we lost - (drook) - (16)
                                     well.. - (beepster) - (15)
                                         How many people making $250k have their own jets? - (drook) - (14)
                                             Re: How many people making $250k have their own jets? - (beepster) - (13)
                                                 The problem with that argument - (drook) - (11)
                                                     the tpers can't drive the bus - (beepster) - (10)
                                                         That explains why Boehner got the bill passed last night -NT - (drook) - (9)
                                                             getting zero dems helps that cause along quite well. -NT - (beepster) - (8)
                                                                 Having the majority is rough, isn't it? -NT - (Another Scott) - (7)
                                                                     not particularly. - (beepster) - (6)
                                                                         [sigh] There *is* a difference - (drook) - (5)
                                                                             no there is not - (beepster) - (4)
                                                                                 You're actually a 'bot, aren't you. <sigh> -NT - (Another Scott) - (3)
                                                                                     well... - (beepster) - (2)
                                                                                         So you're saying - (S1mon_Jester) - (1)
                                                                                             Of course he is - (lincoln)
                                                 About T.E.A. - (Another Scott)
             Liar - (drook) - (1)
                 what...ever -NT - (beepster)
         No, no. Not $250k/yr - $30k/yr is rich. - (Another Scott) - (57)
             Yup, just saw that - (drook) - (1)
                 thats why the dems want a cut of your 401k - (boxley)
             go to the original article - (beepster) - (53)
                 Dean reads the WaPo so I don't have to. ;-) -NT - (Another Scott) - (52)
                     He got that one wrong - (beepster) - (51)
                         Dean Baker has addressed those talking points many times. - (Another Scott) - (3)
                             whoopie for him;-) - (beepster) - (2)
                                 It directly follows from the "logic" of the WaPo article. -NT - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                     no, it doesn't - (beepster)
                         Isn't the military budget increasing? - (S1mon_Jester) - (46)
                             by percentage. not dollars. -NT - (beepster) - (45)
                                 Of course... - (Another Scott) - (44)
                                     Funnier still - (beepster) - (17)
                                         <sigh> -NT - (Another Scott)
                                         Re: Funnier still - (hnick) - (7)
                                             Bullshit. Its right in there...always is.. - (beepster) - (6)
                                                 Your selective outrage is frequently tiresome. - (Another Scott) - (5)
                                                     Ah, its selective - (beepster) - (4)
                                                         Well you're sure *trying* to stop it - (drook) - (3)
                                                             Try 5 - (beepster) - (2)
                                                                 How many people got Food Stamps in 1960? - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                                     pilot started in 61. Act passed in 64. Hmm. - (beepster)
                                         That dead horse won't hunt, - (Ashton) - (7)
                                             if i bothered to translate that.. - (beepster) - (4)
                                                 You won't eat your own dog food.. as usual. - (Ashton) - (3)
                                                     that ain't it. - (beepster) - (2)
                                                         I empathize with that pain you suffer in 'crafting' English. -NT - (Ashton) - (1)
                                                             Clearly -NT - (beepster)
                                             Rep. Lamborn likens Obama to a "tar baby" - (Ashton) - (1)
                                                 Colorado, eh? - (mmoffitt)
                                     Percentages and dollars. - (S1mon_Jester) - (25)
                                         or conversely - (beepster) - (24)
                                             What would you cut, and how would you get enough votes? -NT - (Another Scott) - (6)
                                                 Thankfully, not my job - (beepster) - (5)
                                                     What if the popular thing is also the right thing? - (drook) - (4)
                                                         You may underestimate Beep's comprehension of 'the poor' - (Ashton) - (3)
                                                             That would hardly fit - (beepster) - (2)
                                                                 You're making up stuff again... - (Another Scott)
                                                                 Y'know Beep.. - (Ashton)
                                             No. - (S1mon_Jester) - (9)
                                                 the airlines pay tsa -NT - (boxley) - (8)
                                                     Nope. - (S1mon_Jester) - (7)
                                                         Re: Nope. - (beepster) - (6)
                                                             still a lot of money for theatre -NT - (boxley)
                                                             And you think Congress wouldn't put that excise fee into the - (S1mon_Jester) - (4)
                                                                 Staffing - (beepster) - (3)
                                                                     LOL....Here, let me emphasis it for you. - (S1mon_Jester) - (2)
                                                                         guessing your point is simply - (beepster) - (1)
                                                                             Want to know what's sad? - (S1mon_Jester)
                                             typical conservative response: - (lincoln) - (6)
                                                 wrong - (beepster) - (5)
                                                     Strawman much? -NT - (Another Scott) - (4)
                                                         not here. - (beepster) - (3)
                                                             you might think it - (lincoln) - (2)
                                                                 If you're going to say something about republicans - (beepster) - (1)
                                                                     You can have him. He voted for your ticket after all... -NT - (Another Scott)
             Mark Thoma wasn't impressed with Samuelson, either. - (Another Scott)

This is all frightfully unimportant, but since when has that been a reason not to post?
191 ms