(along with several snide quips upon the general ignorance/ineptness of CIEIOs and their relationship to IT -- as pretty much echoes many comments read here, across the eons)

http://www.balloon-j.../#comment-2630332

Whiskey Screams from a Guy With No Short-Term Memory - June 14, 2011 | 11:57 am · Link

@burnspbesq: You are welcome. I did not intend for one of my main missions in life to be the education of the legal profession about IT issues, but that is what I find myself doing these days. You folks didn’t go into law because you were interested in computers, but they have been thrust upon you and sooner or later you will have to learn a great number of things about how they work, as they are already the instrument via which most criminal and civil evidence will be gleaned, and will only become more important in the future.

I hope that you find the information useful and if you have further questions, you can hit me up on any thread here. I post here frequently, as you well know.

Amongst other commenters, it does seem that the more knowledgeable the poster [content of their post], the more [-] they are, about their (own) company-experience.

One wonders.. is there *any area* left, wherein Murican bizness competence (at top echelons) could be rated Excellent (or even, 'very good') ?
For all the Reactionary folks' deification of their 'free enterprise' fantasy model -VS- Anything-govt:
I know of, at least several government workers who have done Excellent jobs, as in: [cliche alert] 'innovative' solutions to complex problems. Excellent means: 'beyond normal expectations for the position'.

So then, are there any actually-ept CIEIOS who come to mind?
In context ==> 'not completely IT-illiterate', either.