More on 2)
Sure EVERYONE benefits because we're all treated equally under the law.
http://www.quotation...om/quote/805.html The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread. The lowest 20% income bracket got an average tax cut of $27 in 2004 as a result of all of the Bush tax cut provisions - http://www.cbpp.org/files/4-23-04tax.pdf (page 39). $0.52 a week! I guess EVERYONE benefited after all!!!!111 Cheers, Scott. |
|
|
shocker
People who didnt pay income taxes didnt get their income taxes reduced by an income tax reduction
That's just not fair! Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
|
|
|
he is one of Patrick's lesser brother's followers
give me fair of give me death
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
|
Flashback time
- (lincoln)
- (24)
- April 19, 2011, 08:18:14 PM EDT
question, by taxing at 100% of any money made over 250k
- (boxley)
- (23)
- April 20, 2011, 08:03:29 AM EDT
<crickets></crickets> thought so
-NT
- (boxley)
- April 21, 2011, 07:52:09 AM EDT
Not very long.
-NT
- (folkert)
- (20)
- April 21, 2011, 08:08:07 AM EDT
wrong answer
- (boxley)
- (19)
- April 21, 2011, 09:33:11 AM EDT
Of course...
- (S1mon_Jester)
- April 21, 2011, 10:20:44 AM EDT
There is no short-term "spending problem"
- (Another Scott)
- April 21, 2011, 10:22:55 AM EDT
I gave you the answer you wanted.
- (folkert)
- (16)
- April 21, 2011, 01:45:29 PM EDT
IOW
- (beepster)
- (15)
- April 21, 2011, 03:08:45 PM EDT
Re: IOW
- (Another Scott)
- (10)
- April 21, 2011, 03:49:43 PM EDT
About number three
- (jake123)
- (5)
- April 21, 2011, 04:09:28 PM EDT
I was too terse.
- (Another Scott)
- (4)
- April 21, 2011, 04:43:21 PM EDT
So riddle me this
- (beepster)
- (3)
- April 21, 2011, 04:53:21 PM EDT
Re: So riddle me this
- (Another Scott)
- (2)
- April 21, 2011, 05:05:03 PM EDT
so?
- (beepster)
- (1)
- April 21, 2011, 09:18:37 PM EDT
You're not the Amazing Kreskin. <sheesh>
-NT
- (Another Scott)
- April 21, 2011, 09:28:01 PM EDT
Evidence
- (beepster)
- (3)
- April 21, 2011, 04:50:47 PM EDT
Re: Evidence
- (Another Scott)
- (2)
- April 21, 2011, 04:55:02 PM EDT
No sir, you are changing the meaning.
- (beepster)
- (1)
- April 21, 2011, 09:37:45 PM EDT
You're still no Amazing Kreskin. <sheesh>
-NT
- (Another Scott)
- April 21, 2011, 09:51:23 PM EDT
Re: IOW
- (folkert)
- April 21, 2011, 06:33:02 PM EDT
More on 2)
- (Another Scott)
- (2)
- April 22, 2011, 12:47:20 AM EDT
shocker
- (beepster)
- (1)
- April 22, 2011, 07:46:38 AM EDT
he is one of Patrick's lesser brother's followers
- (boxley)
- April 22, 2011, 02:42:22 PM EDT
Nobody claims that alone will solve the deficit problem.
- (Another Scott)
- April 21, 2011, 08:10:08 AM EDT