IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Politics Forum / No sir, you are changing the meaning.
Post #341,800
by beepster
4/21/11 9:37:45 PM
Reply
New No sir, you are changing the meaning.
and also ignoring that for a huge number of people..they either stopped paying all together, or received significantly more back that 10.

You are "qualifying" the term benefit. Def 2..a payment or gift. By changing the code, you paid less. Thats a benefit.

http://www.thedailys...011-ricky-gervais

Even Jon heard it...5:30

He just called it "cutting spending in the tax code".

35% of filers itemize. 45% don't pay.

Hmm. How's that math degree?
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
Post #341,802
by Another Scott
4/21/11 9:51:23 PM
Reply
New You're still no Amazing Kreskin. <sheesh>
     Flashback time - (lincoln) - (24) - April 19, 2011, 08:18:14 PM EDT
         question, by taxing at 100% of any money made over 250k - (boxley) - (23) - April 20, 2011, 08:03:29 AM EDT
             <crickets></crickets> thought so -NT - (boxley) - April 21, 2011, 07:52:09 AM EDT
             Not very long. -NT - (folkert) - (20) - April 21, 2011, 08:08:07 AM EDT
                 wrong answer - (boxley) - (19) - April 21, 2011, 09:33:11 AM EDT
                     Of course... - (S1mon_Jester) - April 21, 2011, 10:20:44 AM EDT
                     There is no short-term "spending problem" - (Another Scott) - April 21, 2011, 10:22:55 AM EDT
                     I gave you the answer you wanted. - (folkert) - (16) - April 21, 2011, 01:45:29 PM EDT
                         IOW - (beepster) - (15) - April 21, 2011, 03:08:45 PM EDT
                             Re: IOW - (Another Scott) - (10) - April 21, 2011, 03:49:43 PM EDT
                                 About number three - (jake123) - (5) - April 21, 2011, 04:09:28 PM EDT
                                     I was too terse. - (Another Scott) - (4) - April 21, 2011, 04:43:21 PM EDT
                                         So riddle me this - (beepster) - (3) - April 21, 2011, 04:53:21 PM EDT
                                             Re: So riddle me this - (Another Scott) - (2) - April 21, 2011, 05:05:03 PM EDT
                                                 so? - (beepster) - (1) - April 21, 2011, 09:18:37 PM EDT
                                                     You're not the Amazing Kreskin. <sheesh> -NT - (Another Scott) - April 21, 2011, 09:28:01 PM EDT
                                 Evidence - (beepster) - (3) - April 21, 2011, 04:50:47 PM EDT
                                     Re: Evidence - (Another Scott) - (2) - April 21, 2011, 04:55:02 PM EDT
                                         No sir, you are changing the meaning. - (beepster) - (1) - April 21, 2011, 09:37:45 PM EDT
                                             You're still no Amazing Kreskin. <sheesh> -NT - (Another Scott) - April 21, 2011, 09:51:23 PM EDT
                             Re: IOW - (folkert) - April 21, 2011, 06:33:02 PM EDT
                             More on 2) - (Another Scott) - (2) - April 22, 2011, 12:47:20 AM EDT
                                 shocker - (beepster) - (1) - April 22, 2011, 07:46:38 AM EDT
                                     he is one of Patrick's lesser brother's followers - (boxley) - April 22, 2011, 02:42:22 PM EDT
             Nobody claims that alone will solve the deficit problem. - (Another Scott) - April 21, 2011, 08:10:08 AM EDT

Dude, down the hall and to the left. That’s who you want.
45 ms