show me the evidence

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #338,463 by beepster 1/11/11 9:47:01 PM Reply	show me the evidence of people at that level in the republican party who is on television every day advocating violence against democrats. on tv every day advocating violence. As your friend nother is fond of saying, evidence please. You won't be able to because that person does not exist. Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
Post #338,509 by lincoln 1/12/11 8:53:41 PM Reply	RE: show me the evidence at "which level"? Please define. Oh, right - it's just another straw man. Not gonna play that game. Like I told Box, go to mediamatters and do a search on the shit Rushbo says, then do a search on "eliminationist" rhetoric from the right wingnuts. And then go read all about the wonderful things RepubliCANTS and their mouthpieces on Faux Noise say about liberals and Democrats: http://dneiwert.blog...ica-appendix.html "Chicago to my mind was the only place to be. ... I above all liked the city because it was filled with people all a-bustle, and the clatter of hooves and carriages, and with delivery wagons and drays and peddlers and the boom and clank of freight trains. And when those black clouds came sailing in from the west, pouring thunderstorms upon us so that you couldn't hear the cries or curses of humankind, I liked that best of all. Chicago could stand up to the worst God had to offer. I understood why it was built--a place for trade, of course, with railroads and ships and so on, but mostly to give all of us a magnitude of defiance that is not provided by one house on the plains. And the plains is where those storms come from." -- E.L. Doctorow
Post #338,530 by beepster 1/12/11 10:12:53 PM Reply	Excuse me, its your need to qualify your statement and you give me a link with maybe 1 example from someone on television. You can't qualify your own statement. Ann Coulter is the best you got? Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
Post #338,570 by lincoln 1/13/11 10:03:06 PM Reply	Re: Excuse me, its your need to qualify your statement For decades, the right wing has said that everything from TV to music to films contributes to the downfall of people and to criminal acts. According to the right wing, even the Janet Jackson wardrobe malfunction "hurt" and influenced tens of thousands of people and promptly slapped huge fines on the network. Yet, now, they say rhetoric is not to blame. Today, Sarah Palin said: "They begin and end with the criminals who commit them, not collectively with all the citizens of a state, not with those who listen to talk radio, not with maps of swing districts used by both sides of the aisle, not by law abiding citizens who respectfully exercise their rights at campaign rallies.....". So, Janet Jackson inspires moral decay and criminal behaviour, but talk radio rhetoric does not? So which is it Bill - do images and rhetoric affect people ... or not? "Chicago to my mind was the only place to be. ... I above all liked the city because it was filled with people all a-bustle, and the clatter of hooves and carriages, and with delivery wagons and drays and peddlers and the boom and clank of freight trains. And when those black clouds came sailing in from the west, pouring thunderstorms upon us so that you couldn't hear the cries or curses of humankind, I liked that best of all. Chicago could stand up to the worst God had to offer. I understood why it was built--a place for trade, of course, with railroads and ships and so on, but mostly to give all of us a magnitude of defiance that is not provided by one house on the plains. And the plains is where those storms come from." -- E.L. Doctorow
Post #338,579 by beepster 1/14/11 7:43:14 AM Reply	nice change of subject Its quite possible that this entire event was caused by violent video games and janet jackson tits. How brilliant of you. Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
Post #338,582 by drook 1/14/11 8:43:27 AM Reply	Lame redirect, even for you -- Drew
Post #338,583 by beepster 1/14/11 8:58:14 AM Reply	Redirect? Me??? Laughable. You might want to re-assess who is trying to redirect here, my response was just going with that flow. Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
Post #338,585 by Another Scott 1/14/11 9:16:24 AM Reply	IOW, the thread is finally dead. You're not interested in a real discussion. Thanks for making it clearer. Perhaps these "both sides" threads can be put to bed now? Cheers, Scott.
Post #338,586 by beepster 1/14/11 9:19:18 AM Reply	Who's not interested in real discussion? Linc is in here now throwing anything over the fence to see if it sticks...and STILL trying to say its the rhetoric in the face of mounting evidence that this kid didn't pay any attention to it. So now the direction turns to "its still bad and they do it more often with more popular people". Pu-freakin-leaze. Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
Post #338,587 by boxley 1/14/11 9:37:17 AM Reply	not until you admit neither side was responsible THIS time Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
Post #338,589 by Another Scott 1/14/11 9:47:47 AM Reply	Have fun then.
Post #338,590 by boxley 1/14/11 10:11:14 AM Reply	thought so, too invested in pushing the agenda Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
Post #338,592 by Another Scott 1/14/11 10:23:16 AM Reply	Heh.

US congresswoman from Arizona shot, 6 dead. - (Another Scott) - (56) - Jan. 8, 2011, 04:31:34 PM EST

Re: US congresswoman from Arizona shot, 6 dead. - (beepster) - (1) - Jan. 8, 2011, 04:34:04 PM EST

:-( Small world, and getting smaller. -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 8, 2011, 05:57:44 PM EST

Re: US congresswoman from Arizona shot, 6 dead. - (lincoln) - (51) - Jan. 9, 2011, 04:18:14 PM EST

should the folks on the left also tone down the violent - (boxley) - (43) - Jan. 9, 2011, 06:20:57 PM EST

Only Sarah and Rush. No one else says anything like that. -NT - (beepster) - Jan. 9, 2011, 08:35:52 PM EST

Some linkies that may be of interest. - (Another Scott) - (22) - Jan. 10, 2011, 12:45:11 AM EST

Re: Some linkies that may be of interest. - (beepster) - (8) - Jan. 10, 2011, 09:36:32 AM EST

Exactly the same. Of course. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Jan. 10, 2011, 09:41:58 AM EST

Hand selected from one group - (beepster) - Jan. 10, 2011, 09:56:07 AM EST

Re: Some linkies that may be of interest. - (beepster) - (5) - Jan. 10, 2011, 10:00:56 AM EST

thats different and doesnt count :-) -NT - (boxley) - (4) - Jan. 10, 2011, 11:01:31 AM EST

Well, I'm sure it's okay, 'cause I bet he had one of these: - (jake123) - (3) - Jan. 10, 2011, 11:45:04 AM EST

pretty sure you could have these people make you one - (boxley) - (1) - Jan. 10, 2011, 12:02:34 PM EST

Pothead, yes. Leftist, not so much - (jake123) - Jan. 10, 2011, 02:59:12 PM EST

Re: Well, I'm sure it's okay, 'cause I bet he had one of the - (beepster) - Jan. 10, 2011, 03:28:49 PM EST

Re: Some linkies that may be of interest. (more) - (beepster) - (10) - Jan. 10, 2011, 03:38:49 PM EST

Re: Some linkies that may be of interest. (more) - (jake123) - (9) - Jan. 10, 2011, 03:55:35 PM EST

Sshhhh..! digital-think is its own Reward -NT - (Ashton) - Jan. 10, 2011, 04:40:00 PM EST

Correct, of course.. - (beepster) - Jan. 10, 2011, 04:43:49 PM EST

th IRS bomb guy was a democrat -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Jan. 10, 2011, 05:31:27 PM EST

But he's not so popular. -NT - (beepster) - Jan. 10, 2011, 05:56:13 PM EST

of course all of your mad bombers were socialists - (boxley) - (4) - Jan. 10, 2011, 05:39:11 PM EST

That wasn't socialism - (jake123) - (3) - Jan. 10, 2011, 07:59:16 PM EST

sure it was, you betcha - (boxley) - (2) - Jan. 10, 2011, 08:06:08 PM EST

Anti-colonialism, and un Quebec francais - (jake123) - (1) - Jan. 10, 2011, 08:22:38 PM EST

Anti-colonialism, and un Quebec Francais Socialiste FIFY -NT - (boxley) - Jan. 10, 2011, 08:25:17 PM EST

Who'd a thunk it... - (beepster) - (1) - Jan. 10, 2011, 06:01:03 PM EST

naw their hands are whitehot from fapping all day over palin - (boxley) - Jan. 10, 2011, 06:09:14 PM EST

Re: should the folks on the left also tone down the violent - (lincoln) - (18) - Jan. 10, 2011, 09:29:35 PM EST

you have a dem in that list - (boxley) - (17) - Jan. 11, 2011, 10:39:46 AM EST

Evidence, please. -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 11, 2011, 10:54:55 AM EST

and it's RepubliCANTS and Fake News - (lincoln) - (15) - Jan. 11, 2011, 07:38:32 PM EST

every day bush was in office -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Jan. 11, 2011, 07:46:36 PM EST

I was alive and awake back then - (lincoln) - Jan. 11, 2011, 07:56:31 PM EST

show me the evidence - (beepster) - (12) - Jan. 11, 2011, 09:47:01 PM EST

RE: show me the evidence - (lincoln) - (11) - Jan. 12, 2011, 08:53:41 PM EST

Excuse me, its your need to qualify your statement - (beepster) - (10) - Jan. 12, 2011, 10:12:53 PM EST

Re: Excuse me, its your need to qualify your statement - (lincoln) - (9) - Jan. 13, 2011, 10:03:06 PM EST

nice change of subject - (beepster) - (8) - Jan. 14, 2011, 07:43:14 AM EST

Lame redirect, even for you -NT - (drook) - (7) - Jan. 14, 2011, 08:43:27 AM EST

Redirect? Me??? Laughable. - (beepster) - (6) - Jan. 14, 2011, 08:58:14 AM EST

IOW, the thread is finally dead. - (Another Scott) - (5) - Jan. 14, 2011, 09:16:24 AM EST

Who's not interested in real discussion? - (beepster) - Jan. 14, 2011, 09:19:18 AM EST

not until you admit neither side was responsible THIS time -NT - (boxley) - (3) - Jan. 14, 2011, 09:37:17 AM EST

Have fun then. -NT - (Another Scott) - (2) - Jan. 14, 2011, 09:47:47 AM EST

thought so, too invested in pushing the agenda -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Jan. 14, 2011, 10:11:14 AM EST

Heh. -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 14, 2011, 10:23:16 AM EST

for a right wing nutjob he had some interested reading - (boxley) - (6) - Jan. 10, 2011, 02:14:05 PM EST

Mein Kampf is far from leftist - (jake123) - (5) - Jan. 10, 2011, 03:01:26 PM EST

most commies have read mein kampf and borrowed from it -NT - (boxley) - (4) - Jan. 10, 2011, 03:13:10 PM EST

Be that as it may, it's still one of the canonical texts of - (jake123) - (3) - Jan. 10, 2011, 03:27:13 PM EST

I'd also like to add - (jake123) - (2) - Jan. 10, 2011, 08:31:15 PM EST

nope its sports and rightwingers - (boxley) - (1) - Jan. 10, 2011, 08:36:07 PM EST

"because that's what the markets can sell" - (jake123) - Jan. 10, 2011, 08:47:35 PM EST

Mugshot's out - (jake123) - (1) - Jan. 10, 2011, 08:02:21 PM EST

haircut matches the voodoo setup in the backyard -NT - (boxley) - Jan. 10, 2011, 08:06:52 PM EST

iwethey.org

This is gonna blow up - like a coeliac at a bread festival.
97 ms