and THAT might have focused some eyes on what Visa and Mastercard do behind the curtain. Not that I'm alleging anything, but this sure seems like a preemptive strike.
cause his next leak was targeting banks
and THAT might have focused some eyes on what Visa and Mastercard do behind the curtain. Not that I'm alleging anything, but this sure seems like a preemptive strike.
"Chicago to my mind was the only place to be. ... I above all liked the city because it was filled with people all a-bustle, and the clatter of hooves and carriages, and with delivery wagons and drays and peddlers and the boom and clank of freight trains. And when those black clouds came sailing in from the west, pouring thunderstorms upon us so that you couldn't hear the cries or curses of humankind, I liked that best of all. Chicago could stand up to the worst God had to offer. I understood why it was built--a place for trade, of course, with railroads and ships and so on, but mostly to give all of us a magnitude of defiance that is not provided by one house on the plains. And the plains is where those storms come from." -- E.L. Doctorow |
|
As I said elsewhere.
WikiLeaks announced the subject of the next release way too far in advance of the actual release. It should have been mere days, not weeks.
Of course, perhaps it was deliberate to see who would get the jitters. Note that Visa was invented by Bank of America. I wonder if that has anything to do with it... Wade. Q:Is it proper to eat cheeseburgers with your fingers? A:No, the fingers should be eaten separately. |
|
I'm sure it does have everything to do with it.
As soon as the announcement was a Major Bank... all heck broke loose on WikiLeaks.
And the focus was shifted to the US Cables. |
|
Dunno. Assange said he had bank stuff last year.
It was alluded to earlier, but here's the link (from October 9, 2009). I guess nobody reads Computerworld. ;-)
http://www.computerw...b_a_leakier_place [...] The way things have turned out with the State cables, it sort-of proves the first paragraph, doesn't it? I think the story turned with the sex allegations, not the bank stuff. FWIW. Cheers, Scott. |
|
In 2009 did bank any execs even know what a "Wikileak" was?
Last year Wikileaks stories were in Computerworld. This year they're in the Wall Street Journal. Not surprising they noticed it this time.
--
Drew |
|
Yeah, Assange and wikileaks are actually being really smart
The simple truth is that it's become very apparent to any and everyone who's paying attention just who the people within our governments really work for... and that this is the case all across the western nations. 100%.
|