Don't think that's the problem

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #336,649 by drook 12/3/10 5:09:15 PM Reply	Don't think that's the problem That 3-7 second delay I mentioned is on the first page load. Nothing else starts downloading until after that. -- Drew
Post #336,653 by malraux 12/3/10 5:35:50 PM Reply	Have you tried FireBug's Net tab or IEWatch? Something that tells you what is loading when, and how long it takes. Regards, -scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
Post #336,660 by drook 12/3/10 7:34:10 PM Reply	That's where I get the 3-7 seconds for initial page load -- Drew
Post #336,705 by scoenye 12/4/10 3:25:07 PM Reply	No long delay here + a couple of observations The redirect from www.cooklikeyourgrandmother.com to cooklikeyourgrandmother.com adds almost a second to the initial page load time in my case. It also generates a second DNS hit. If your DNS server is slow to resond or you have a broken forwarder (say a certain type of Belkin wireless router) this could easily exacerbate the delay. There are no long delays downloading parts once the root page is loaded. I do see long delays closing connections, but that does not seem to have an effect on page display. The delays occur on both sides, so this may just be the way HTTP works. E.g. the last request is finished after 9s but the last connection is closed at 22s. The blog doesn't have the redirect overhead and otherwise behaves the same as the main page. Most of the static content you provide (images, css, ...) has the Expires header set to April 15 2010. This sets up an extra trip to the server for everything that is used more than once.
Post #336,711 by drook 12/4/10 5:33:10 PM Reply	Thanks for noticing the expires header The article I copied some optimization tips from was written in 2007. At the time 2010 was "far future". -- Drew

Need help analyzing web server performance - (drook) - (20) - Dec. 1, 2010, 11:01:46 PM EST

Wordpress is in PHP, isn't it? - (static) - (17) - Dec. 2, 2010, 03:46:01 AM EST

Yes it is - (drook) - (16) - Dec. 2, 2010, 09:26:47 AM EST

PHP Memory limits. - (static) - (15) - Dec. 2, 2010, 03:15:36 PM EST

What if there are multiple, conflicting calls? - (drook) - (14) - Dec. 2, 2010, 05:32:00 PM EST

Two answers. - (static) - (13) - Dec. 3, 2010, 04:23:47 AM EST

Just found php.ini has a 90M limit - (drook) - (12) - Dec. 3, 2010, 08:46:17 AM EST

Re: Just found php.ini has a 90M limit - (folkert) - (9) - Dec. 3, 2010, 09:42:02 AM EST

Noticed that recently too - (drook) - (8) - Dec. 3, 2010, 09:53:21 AM EST

That can happen if your software isn't - (jake123) - (7) - Dec. 3, 2010, 10:57:20 AM EST

But it is ... I already made sure of that ... oh wait - (drook) - (6) - Dec. 3, 2010, 01:26:21 PM EST

CSS listed first on the page? - (malraux) - (5) - Dec. 3, 2010, 03:33:17 PM EST

Don't think that's the problem - (drook) - (4) - Dec. 3, 2010, 05:09:15 PM EST

Have you tried FireBug's Net tab or IEWatch? - (malraux) - (3) - Dec. 3, 2010, 05:35:50 PM EST

That's where I get the 3-7 seconds for initial page load -NT - (drook) - (2) - Dec. 3, 2010, 07:34:10 PM EST

No long delay here + a couple of observations - (scoenye) - (1) - Dec. 4, 2010, 03:25:07 PM EST

Thanks for noticing the expires header - (drook) - Dec. 4, 2010, 05:33:10 PM EST

Not necessarily. - (static) - (1) - Dec. 3, 2010, 05:00:17 PM EST

Haven't played with it yet - (drook) - Dec. 3, 2010, 05:08:16 PM EST

Bleah you are using PHP. - (folkert) - (1) - Dec. 2, 2010, 06:07:07 AM EST

Surprisingly today... - (folkert) - Dec. 2, 2010, 03:44:01 PM EST

iwethey.org

Dude...
46 ms