You've missed the other key point

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #333,461 by jake123 9/30/10 5:38:01 PM Reply	You've missed the other key point Entry points into a wireless network are neither infinitely available, nor free. To be sure, you can have a LOT of shortcodes available, but they're not infinite. The problem here is that the TOS with the party offering the short codes to third parties explicitly signed a contract saying they needed approval from T-Mobile for any new services they'd offer on one of the short codes they have assigned to them. They did not do so, so T-Mobile cut them off. I'm not sure why this is a problem here.
Post #333,463 by boxley 9/30/10 5:43:23 PM Reply	freetards is the problem Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
Post #333,601 by crazy 10/2/10 11:42:33 PM Reply	The problem is box miscategorised it Which then became the focus point. Not "freetards". I don't expect shit for free, I expect to get what I pay for. And in this case, maybe the source of the message is subject to the contract, which in turn means I can't ask for the message via the shortlist code. Fine. According to box, he should be able to block ANY automated commercial message. Like Facebook's text to your phone to confirm a password reset. Or any other automated list request. And they also want to pick and choose on political speech. The answer to that is no. And it has nothing to do with wanting something for nothing.

so people should be allowed to spam sms - (boxley) - (62) - Sept. 24, 2010, 10:59:49 PM EDT

Where do you see spam? - (scoenye) - (57) - Sept. 24, 2010, 11:47:58 PM EDT

not the point - (boxley) - (56) - Sept. 25, 2010, 12:00:40 AM EDT

But this case has nothing to do with spam - (scoenye) - (55) - Sept. 25, 2010, 09:23:11 AM EDT

He does - (crazy) - (54) - Sept. 25, 2010, 09:29:40 AM EDT

sort of - (boxley) - (53) - Sept. 25, 2010, 10:39:22 AM EDT

Please - (crazy) - (52) - Sept. 25, 2010, 12:27:33 PM EDT

is the judges ruling narrow or broad? - (boxley) - (3) - Sept. 25, 2010, 04:59:53 PM EDT

Poor dodge - (crazy) - (2) - Sept. 25, 2010, 10:58:16 PM EDT

nope, wrong question - (boxley) - (1) - Sept. 26, 2010, 10:01:54 AM EDT

Huh? - (crazy) - Sept. 27, 2010, 01:52:28 AM EDT

It is asked for - (scoenye) - Sept. 25, 2010, 07:11:39 PM EDT

Yeah, as a person in a similar line of work - (jake123) - (46) - Sept. 25, 2010, 09:06:08 PM EDT

You know what it comes down to? - (static) - Sept. 25, 2010, 11:53:02 PM EDT

That is what we currently have - (scoenye) - (44) - Sept. 26, 2010, 10:39:08 AM EDT

Dude, I don't think you realise - (jake123) - (43) - Sept. 27, 2010, 12:37:12 PM EDT

Give them a whitelist - (crazy) - (32) - Sept. 27, 2010, 06:20:48 PM EDT

can we give the users your phone number for support? - (boxley) - (1) - Sept. 27, 2010, 07:32:37 PM EDT

Free? No - (crazy) - Sept. 27, 2010, 09:08:04 PM EDT

They have whitelists - (jake123) - (29) - Sept. 28, 2010, 09:52:32 AM EDT

See above - (crazy) - (28) - Sept. 29, 2010, 06:15:17 PM EDT

Re: See above - (boxley) - (27) - Sept. 29, 2010, 08:35:50 PM EDT

Which is it? - (drook) - (26) - Sept. 29, 2010, 11:27:44 PM EDT

Mass, one or more automated messages - (boxley) - (22) - Sept. 30, 2010, 07:38:59 AM EDT

So... me sending... - (folkert) - (21) - Sept. 30, 2010, 08:43:32 AM EDT

just because the carrier allows you to abuse their TOS - (boxley) - (8) - Sept. 30, 2010, 09:57:40 AM EDT

If he pays for the service - (beepster) - (2) - Sept. 30, 2010, 11:28:10 AM EDT

And I do pay for unlimited. -NT - (folkert) - Sept. 30, 2010, 03:10:49 PM EDT

Re: If he pays for the service - (boxley) - Sept. 30, 2010, 03:12:39 PM EDT

Selective enforcement... - (folkert) - (4) - Sept. 30, 2010, 03:11:30 PM EDT

Technical solution that proves this is bogus - (drook) - (3) - Sept. 30, 2010, 03:34:59 PM EDT

I don't have a problem with... - (folkert) - (2) - Sept. 30, 2010, 07:09:05 PM EDT

whats this free shyte? - (boxley) - (1) - Sept. 30, 2010, 08:39:17 PM EDT

Ok jackass... - (folkert) - Oct. 1, 2010, 10:32:18 AM EDT

Speaking of Nagios - (jake123) - (11) - Sept. 30, 2010, 05:35:03 PM EDT

Preventing use of the service by others is covered in ToS - (drook) - (3) - Sept. 30, 2010, 05:58:53 PM EDT

We are not using the ... - (folkert) - (2) - Sept. 30, 2010, 07:05:49 PM EDT

Yes, that is the part of the infrastructure that I run - (jake123) - (1) - Sept. 30, 2010, 10:33:56 PM EDT

I'm sorry... I should have said... - (folkert) - Oct. 1, 2010, 10:43:23 AM EDT

We only send to those that are supposed to... - (folkert) - (6) - Sept. 30, 2010, 06:58:09 PM EDT

Possible SES? - (drook) - (2) - Sept. 30, 2010, 09:42:35 PM EDT

headcount doesnt approach zero -NT - (boxley) - Sept. 30, 2010, 10:00:55 PM EDT

Actually, prioritizing automated messages last - (jake123) - Sept. 30, 2010, 10:37:35 PM EDT

Heh - (jake123) - (2) - Sept. 30, 2010, 10:34:47 PM EDT

Look at the post where I explained... - (folkert) - (1) - Oct. 1, 2010, 10:46:50 AM EDT

Just did read that - (jake123) - Oct. 3, 2010, 02:33:52 PM EDT

You've missed the other key point - (jake123) - (2) - Sept. 30, 2010, 05:38:01 PM EDT

freetards is the problem -NT - (boxley) - Sept. 30, 2010, 05:43:23 PM EDT

The problem is box miscategorised it - (crazy) - Oct. 2, 2010, 11:42:33 PM EDT

To put this wreck back on the rails... - (scoenye) - (9) - Sept. 28, 2010, 06:30:00 PM EDT

try reading the link - (boxley) - (8) - Sept. 28, 2010, 08:33:11 PM EDT

Someone aleady quoted that - (drook) - (7) - Sept. 28, 2010, 10:38:47 PM EDT

one more time, if the ruling goes against - (boxley) - (6) - Sept. 28, 2010, 11:04:27 PM EDT

A pleading doesn't determine the ruling. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Sept. 28, 2010, 11:42:06 PM EDT

if the ruling states they MUST deliver it does exactly that -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Sept. 29, 2010, 08:02:08 AM EDT

And if wishes were horses ... We'll see. -NT - (Another Scott) - Sept. 29, 2010, 09:48:38 AM EDT

Please answer these two simple questions - (drook) - (2) - Sept. 28, 2010, 11:43:02 PM EDT

Re: Please answer these two simple questions - (boxley) - (1) - Sept. 29, 2010, 08:01:31 AM EDT

Hear that - (crazy) - Sept. 29, 2010, 06:12:01 PM EDT

Settled out of court. - (folkert) - (1) - Oct. 1, 2010, 06:44:34 PM EDT

good, having that albatross going the wrong way would be bad - (boxley) - Oct. 1, 2010, 08:56:35 PM EDT

So should T-Mobile go to jail for bank robbery now? - (crazy) - (1) - Oct. 2, 2010, 11:47:14 PM EDT

Freakin' awesome! - (folkert) - Oct. 3, 2010, 12:27:18 AM EDT

iwethey.org

ONE THE MACHINE!
173 ms