Re: Replication-friendly Editor?

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #33,083 by Arkadiy 3/21/02 9:12:54 PM Reply	Re: Replication-friendly Editor? Emacs (and probably Multiedit) do a good job highlighting differences. As to deducing patterns and doing something about them - that's what programmers are paid to do. I don't think there will ever be an automated tool for that. When done by humans, it's called .... (drrum rrolll) .... refactoring!
Post #33,094 by wharris2 3/21/02 10:36:02 PM Reply	I knew someone was going to mention That Awful OS Emacs, that is. It's not an editor, it's an operating system. "I didn't know you could drive to Europe." -- An eavesdropper, piping in when he overheard a conversation about someone who had driven to Montreal.
Post #33,244 by tablizer 3/23/02 2:53:18 PM Reply	Any comments then on the Java OS vs. Emacs OS? ________________ oop.ismad.com
Post #33,128 by neelk 3/22/02 9:26:51 AM Reply	What about the refactoring browser, then? Various Smalltalks have a tool that will let you automatically make these changes. You highlight a bit of code, select which transform you want, and poof it's done.
Post #33,133 by Arkadiy 3/22/02 9:59:44 AM Reply	Ooops :)

Replication-friendly Editor? - (tablizer) - (7) - March 21, 2002, 08:25:10 PM EST

Re: Replication-friendly Editor? - (Arkadiy) - (4) - March 21, 2002, 09:12:54 PM EST

I knew someone was going to mention That Awful OS - (wharris2) - (1) - March 21, 2002, 10:36:02 PM EST

Any comments then on the Java OS vs. Emacs OS? -NT - (tablizer) - March 23, 2002, 02:53:18 PM EST

What about the refactoring browser, then? - (neelk) - (1) - March 22, 2002, 09:26:51 AM EST

Ooops :) -NT - (Arkadiy) - March 22, 2002, 09:59:44 AM EST

Uhhm... Are you looking for Diff (M$ OSes:"FC") + Patch? -NT - (CRConrad) - March 25, 2002, 06:53:30 AM EST

pcwrite, if it is still out there -NT - (boxley) - March 25, 2002, 02:36:21 PM EST

And it's like that.
90 ms