![]() |
|
![]() where she explains that she worked with the family and realized that color doesnt matter, that isnt the point. The audience was clearly racist in its reaction to the beginning of the statement at 49-52 seconds before they had the paul harvey moment. She isnt racist, her audience clearly was.
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() you would be tuning up the civil rights attorneys as we speak.
|
|
![]() This covers the topic pretty well for me: http://www.theatlant...ic-scandal/60147/
In each case, the controversy requires an esoteric reading. The great preponderance of the evidence is dismissed as concealing what the enlightened few are able to recognize as the hidden truth. Small deviations, instead of being ignored as insignificant exceptions, become freighted with greater meaning than the norm. And these arguments are immune from rebuttal. Any action, any words that would seem to contradict the esoteric reading can be dismissed as cover. Anyone unable to see the hidden meanings that are so readily apparent to believers can safely be ignored, because they refuse to see the truth. A few words in a longer comment don't enlighten. They can be twisted and appear to mean the opposite of what the person actually said. I've said on many occasions that context matters. Believe it or not, I believe that. FWIW. Cheers, Scott. |