IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New You're forgetting the First Rule of Holes.
"If you're in a hole, stop digging." Blowing up a blowout is a way to make it much worse.

The blowout happened because of loss of integrity of the bore in the first place - http://en.wikipedia....n_oil_spill#April The failure of the BOP wasn't the ultimate cause of the disaster. But its failure made the spill much worse once the blowout happened.

One of the reasons why they haven't attempted to install a new BOP is that the well structure probably can't tolerate being completely plugged from above. That's another reason why the only solution is to seal it from below.

Cheers,
Scott.
New an underwater torch is better than a spill
New Explain to me what a torch or thermite is going to do.
Other than make it worse.

You've got a 20-some-odd inch pipe with something like 2M gal/day of oil (and millions of cubic feet of gas) coming out at 2000+ PSI. What is a torch or thermite going to do to seal that big a leak?

Thanks.

Cheers,
Scott.
New here, have a boo
apparently I am not the only one thinking along these lines
http://www.facebook....topic=95&post=525
To my knowledge, anecdotal information leads me to believe that when Saddam Hussein scuttled offshore production rigs during the invasion of Iraq by the U.S. Military the U.S. Military sealed wells running wild off the coast of Iraq, (off the port of Basra), with the same methods. They weren't as deep, but they purportedly used the same methods for a quick seal.
New Heh.
But I'm discounting this theory as unworkable.


Thought experiments are nice, but reality is a little more complicated.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Who is that mysterious stranger at the end of that page? :-)
New my idea is different as you noticed
New Where's the oxygen going to come from to "burn" it?
It won't work. Sorry.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Doesnt need oxygen, whole point of the idea
its a chemical reaction not a fire
check here under water
http://www.youtube.c...tch?v=d0twTXVlneY
more fun here
http://video.google....1843493488769585#


New Mythbusters Toast 1/2 Ton of Thermite
http://www.youtube.c...Q&feature=related
New Not the same thing.
That's a thermite reaction. You get similar effects dropping pure sodium or pure magnesium in water - lots of heat and lots of light.

"Burning" is oxidation of something.

Putting thermite in a high pressure stream of oil and natural gas isn't going to make the oil and natural gas burn unless there's a significant source of oxygen. There isn't one under the ocean. (Recall that fiery blowouts on land used to be put out with dynamite (which blows away the oxygen for combustion).) Heating up a small portion of the stream to some high temperature isn't going to solve anything.

I suspect the thermite would quickly be extinguished by the rushing oil and gas (e.g. quickly buried by a coating of tar). Plus, there's the minor issue of safely supplying thermite to the well head...

It's not going to work. Sorry.

Cheers,
Scott.
New BTW administration claims 40k bpd not 2 million
New 40k barrels/day * 42 gallons/barrel = 1.7M gal/day. HTH :-)
New Great comments here by an industry dude
http://www.theoildru...93#comment-648967


First of all...set aside all your thoughts of plugging the well and stopping it from blowing out oil using any method from the top down. Plugs, big valves to just shut it off, pinching the pipe closed, installing a new bop or lmrp, shooting any epoxy in it, top kills with mud etc etc etc....forget that, it won't be happening..it's done and over. In fact actually opening up the well at the subsea source and allowing it to gush more is not only exactly what has happened, it was probably necessary, or so they think anyway.

So you have to ask WHY? Why make it worse?...there really can only be one answer and that answer does not bode well for all of us. It's really an inescapable conclusion at this point, unless you want to believe that every Oil and Gas professional involved suddenly just forgot everything they know or woke up one morning and drank a few big cups of stupid and got assigned to directing the response to this catastrophe. Nothing makes sense unless you take this into account, but after you do...you will see the "sense" behind what has happened and what is happening. That conclusion is this:

The well bore structure is compromised "Down hole".



Go read the whole thing - it's worth your time.




"Chicago to my mind was the only place to be. ... I above all liked the city because it was filled with people all a-bustle, and the clatter of hooves and carriages, and with delivery wagons and drays and peddlers and the boom and clank of freight trains. And when those black clouds came sailing in from the west, pouring thunderstorms upon us so that you couldn't hear the cries or curses of humankind, I liked that best of all. Chicago could stand up to the worst God had to offer. I understood why it was built--a place for trade, of course, with railroads and ships and so on, but mostly to give all of us a magnitude of defiance that is not provided by one house on the plains. And the plains is where those storms come from."

-- E.L. Doctorow
New Thanks.
New ditto, good read
New What a nightmare...
Apparently there's a substantial risk of the BOP falling over and the entire well structure failing. Leading to a total blowout of the reservoir...

If the BP data correctly or honestly identified four separate reservoirs then a bleed-out might gush less than 2 to 2.5 billion barrels unless the walls -- as it were -- fracture or partially collapse. I am hearing the same dark rumors which suggest fracturing and a complete bleed-out are already underway. Rumors also suggest a massive collapse of the Gulf floor itself is in the making. They are just rumors but it is time for geologists or related experts to end their deafening silence and speak to these possibilities.


80-100 billion gallons... :-(

Cheers,
Scott.
New shelburn at TOD responds (on June 25) to DougR
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/6659

A gentle but persuasive takedown.

In this post, I would like to respond to a long comment made by DougR a few days ago, that has received a lot of publicity.

First, I will say that in one area we are in complete agreement. BP and the USCG have been less than forthcoming, and in doing so have hurt both themselves and the general public as all kinds of wild rumors and technical misinformation abound. Some of this misinformation results in harm to individuals and businesses as people suffer increased stress and tourists cancel vacations.

In this information vacuum it is easy to make wrong assumptions that lead to mistaken conclusions. It can be made worse if you have some degree of technical knowledge and verbiage and use that to make a case for a scenario that doesn’t pass muster with actual engineering analysis but sounds highly authoritative to many people, some TV commentators and various politicians.


Cheers,
Scott.
New Just got around to reading all the TOD material, comments
Correction, started-to-read..

Note there are (now many) more threads at
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/6593
ditto: /6594, 6599, 6595 [in that order], 6604 ... and MORE!

As. In. DOOM approaches. And I'm only in 6594.
<<HOLY FUCKING SHIT>>

BP liquidated ... can't UNDO what Halliburton fucked-up way-early in the drilling == the trend I see.
Potentially random sea-bed leaks ad infinitum.
Bring all the troops home, sell Afgh/Iraq to highest bidder, kill 90% of new military largess to Corps to refight the cold war, defund all children's health guilt-agencies:
would that be a start?

We won't be seeing much in the MSM, at this anxiety level -- until {___}

     when msnbc thinks the prez is a tard - (boxley) - (27)
         Depends on who runs against him, doesn't it? - (Another Scott) - (26)
             brit view - (boxley) - (25)
                 My, things are interesing in Boxleyland. ;-) -NT - (Another Scott)
                 Yeah right - (jake123) - (20)
                     thermite works underwater - (boxley) - (19)
                         You're forgetting the First Rule of Holes. - (Another Scott) - (18)
                             an underwater torch is better than a spill -NT - (boxley) - (11)
                                 Explain to me what a torch or thermite is going to do. - (Another Scott) - (10)
                                     here, have a boo - (boxley) - (7)
                                         Heh. - (Another Scott) - (6)
                                             Who is that mysterious stranger at the end of that page? :-) -NT - (Another Scott)
                                             my idea is different as you noticed -NT - (boxley) - (4)
                                                 Where's the oxygen going to come from to "burn" it? - (Another Scott) - (3)
                                                     Doesnt need oxygen, whole point of the idea - (boxley) - (2)
                                                         Mythbusters Toast 1/2 Ton of Thermite - (boxley)
                                                         Not the same thing. - (Another Scott)
                                     BTW administration claims 40k bpd not 2 million -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                         40k barrels/day * 42 gallons/barrel = 1.7M gal/day. HTH :-) -NT - (Another Scott)
                             Great comments here by an industry dude - (lincoln) - (5)
                                 Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                     ditto, good read -NT - (boxley)
                                 What a nightmare... - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                     shelburn at TOD responds (on June 25) to DougR - (Another Scott)
                                 Just got around to reading all the TOD material, comments - (Ashton)
                 British media is making sound like the US is anti-British - (SpiceWare) - (2)
                     we are - (boxley) - (1)
                         don't agree, calling something by it's old name is not anti- - (SpiceWare)

I've got you in my hands.
69 ms