IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New could you point to some place in
history where perhaps a model has been in place that would suit your purpose? Something of this planet perhaps? While you have traditionally rallied to the cause of "what do conservatives want to conserve?", I don't believe you have yet to promote Ashtotopia to anyone, either.

While your snark certainly does entertain...I am reminded of that great literary scholar S Wright, who noted...

"A friend of mine once sent me a postcard with a picture of the entire planet Earth taken from space.

On the back it said, Wish you were here"

I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
New The problem with the Reactionary view is apparent:
If something beneficial to society as a whole Didn't happen-exactly In The Past® --
It Couldn't Happen in any next.

Substitute Reactionary for the modern 'Conservative', 97.7% identical.
Pity the word has been elided within the billions of soundbytes spewed all over the æther.
Guess most of the current writers are too young ever to have heard it.

(Sorry, there's no Ashtopia to be outlined.
After all, there wasn't one way-back. How could there be one next?)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I could almost see voting for Palin in 2012 on the grounds that this sorry ratfucking excuse for a republic, this savage, smirking, predatory empire deserves her. Bring on the Rapture, motherfuckers!
-- via RC
New Thanks for clearing that up
the other ways are bad...your way doesn't exist. It could.

Hence the SW quote.

I'll anxiously await Zefram in your honor.
I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
New Well, perhaps even, you could.. think outside The Box? too
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I could almost see voting for Palin in 2012 on the grounds that this sorry ratfucking excuse for a republic, this savage, smirking, predatory empire deserves her. Bring on the Rapture, motherfuckers!
-- via RC
New I could..and often do...
...but prefer to deal with issues within a defined set of reality that doesn't require 6.7bn "aha" moments to work.
I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
     Doc targets Obama voters for layoffs in advance of Obamacare - (lincoln) - (38)
         Maybe you can do that in Texas . . . - (Andrew Grygus)
         there's an update at the end - (SpiceWare) - (36)
             Here's the next update - (mhuber) - (34)
                 And the next.. - (beepster) - (33)
                     Where? - (jake123) - (32)
                         plumbers rates for a home visit vary from $65 to name brand - (boxley) - (1)
                             Master plumbers up here - (jake123)
                         Re: Where? - (beepster) - (29)
                             What, lawyers don't have to by malpractice insurance? - (jake123) - (11)
                                 Thats to break even. - (beepster) - (10)
                                     Dude, you don't seem to understand something - (jake123) - (3)
                                         ..and it is Our Nature to Fight that Fact with every Disney - (Ashton) - (1)
                                             would you care - (beepster)
                                         Don't I? - (beepster)
                                     Most physicians aren't sole proprietors. - (Another Scott) - (5)
                                         And how much of that is by necessity? - (beepster) - (4)
                                             No, that's not it. - (Another Scott) - (3)
                                                 Not really - (beepster) - (2)
                                                     Regardless - (mhuber) - (1)
                                                         Agree - (beepster)
                             I suspect someone's giving worst case numbers... - (Another Scott) - (15)
                                 I don't need to read the numbers. - (Andrew Grygus) - (14)
                                     Quod Erat.. oh, you know.. - (Ashton) - (9)
                                         To each.. - (beepster) - (8)
                                             And without a soupçon of *Society Maintenance by Each - (Ashton) - (7)
                                                 Ah, I see... - (beepster) - (6)
                                                     As Peter Geyl observes, - (Ashton) - (5)
                                                         could you point to some place in - (beepster) - (4)
                                                             The problem with the Reactionary view is apparent: - (Ashton) - (3)
                                                                 Thanks for clearing that up - (beepster) - (2)
                                                                     Well, perhaps even, you could.. think outside The Box? too -NT - (Ashton) - (1)
                                                                         I could..and often do... - (beepster)
                                     And all those beemers - (beepster) - (3)
                                         Lots of Beemers in East LA - (Andrew Grygus) - (2)
                                             enterprising young men they are! - (beepster) - (1)
                                                 snort! -NT - (boxley)
                             Same tired argument that - (Ashton)
             Re: there's an update at the end - (lincoln)

I'm trying to be scientific about the ineffable and all you can think of is your schwantz.
75 ms