IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New No fishing for you!
If you're silly enough to believe that, you probably have no business fishing anyway.

http://mediamatters....arch/201003100014

HTH.

Cheers,
Scott.
New havnt spent much time in the fishing wars have you?
the folks appointed to that panel have had an agenda for years to stop fishing everywhere they can. The fact that they shut down public debate before the affected parties cordially known in commercial fishing circles as "sports fishercunts" have a legitimate gripe. With the cheney junta we were safe, when Obama came in we thought he would be too busy, Apparently not. These are the same asswipes that used to fly in from DC during the Clinton years and packed the public meetings in Alaska so the locals couldnt be heard. Clinton was a political animal and kept them on a short leash. Apparently Obama thinks differently.
If we torture the data long enough, it will confess. (Ronald Coase, Nobel Prize for Economic Sciences, 1991)
New A lot of semantics in there.
I can certainly see "better manage and limit human impact for preservation yadda yadda" work into a ban in specific locations deemed "preservation land".

Was the first article a bit reactionary..absolutely...does your mediamatters page actually debunk the first in its entirety?...Not a chance.
I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
New The editor certainly walked it back, after the fact.
http://sports.espn.g..._steve&id=4982359

Oh, and the comment period kerfluffle?

The taskforce was created last June. Comments ended in February. They got at least 1844 of them ( http://www.whitehous...s/oceans/comments ). A 38 page interim report was issued in September and people could comment on that (at least 1935 comments are there - http://www.whitehous...imreport/comments ). People can still write BHO and their congress people to make their views known. It's hard to imagine that the issues haven't been raised already.

I don't see how any of this somehow shows that Obama isn't going to let people fish any more or isn't listening to their views.

YMMV.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Bill Clinton Lives!
If that BS is "semantics" then the definition if "is" is a wide open question.

But there is a bigger conspiracy against the fishing community.
It started with the notorious Democrat Franklin Pierce. Since he installed it, no Democratic president has ever allowed fishing in the White House bathtub.
     now they are going to stop me from fishing? bastrds - (boxley) - (10)
         Er..., who, how, what? Like you'll stop if "they" tell you. - (Silverlock) - (1)
             well it does introduce dificulties -NT - (boxley)
         No fishing for you! - (Another Scott) - (4)
             havnt spent much time in the fishing wars have you? - (boxley)
             A lot of semantics in there. - (beepster) - (2)
                 The editor certainly walked it back, after the fact. - (Another Scott)
                 Bill Clinton Lives! - (mhuber)
         Los Angeles Times mentioned this today. - (Andrew Grygus) - (2)
             AKA "Truthiness". Colbert nailed that mindset long ago. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                 PS - I did find the Shrub Roast-via-truthiness - (Ashton)

It was the internet of the day. It was delivered by Fiber Coptics.
39 ms