IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New not really, pretty typical of her
since only she needs to pay for health care as Todd the kids and the grand are treated free by the Indian Health Service it may have been hard to get her covered. Since the nearest decent doc in Canada is in whitehorse yt approximately 1300 RT miles by road from her house and gas being about $4.50 a gallon I would suggest she is being disingenuous at the very least
If we torture the data long enough, it will confess. (Ronald Coase, Nobel Prize for Economic Sciences, 1991)
New Skagway.
http://washingtonind...r-for-health-care

HTH.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Re: Skagway.
still a haul and during that time period would not have been cheaper.
If we torture the data long enough, it will confess. (Ronald Coase, Nobel Prize for Economic Sciences, 1991)
New Unless she had a fake YT id.
That would make it cheaper.
New we are talking 1960's different back then
If we torture the data long enough, it will confess. (Ronald Coase, Nobel Prize for Economic Sciences, 1991)
New No you're not... you're talking about seventies if she was a
child, and eighties if she was a young mother... which would certainly be the case if you're talking about the period when her hub and children were covered and she wasn't.
New she was six, she is 54 makes it 1962
If we torture the data long enough, it will confess. (Ronald Coase, Nobel Prize for Economic Sciences, 1991)
New According to her wikipedia page, she was born in 64
six makes it 1970.

She sure isn't in her fifties.
New apologies, thought she was 54
If we torture the data long enough, it will confess. (Ronald Coase, Nobel Prize for Economic Sciences, 1991)
     Sarah Palin is a TOTAL hypocrite! - (lincoln) - (10)
         not really, pretty typical of her - (boxley) - (8)
             Skagway. - (Another Scott) - (7)
                 Re: Skagway. - (boxley) - (6)
                     Unless she had a fake YT id. - (jake123) - (5)
                         we are talking 1960's different back then -NT - (boxley) - (4)
                             No you're not... you're talking about seventies if she was a - (jake123) - (3)
                                 she was six, she is 54 makes it 1962 -NT - (boxley) - (2)
                                     According to her wikipedia page, she was born in 64 - (jake123) - (1)
                                         apologies, thought she was 54 -NT - (boxley)
         No, she's merely moronic - (warmachine)

Powered by ZOPE, PostgreSQL, and a bottled slimemold.
119 ms