Obviously that's the big change the Govt. would have to make
They'd have to redefine "full-time employee" to mean something less than 40 hours.
--
Drew |
How to fix the labor market.
- (Another Scott)
- (38)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 03:30:27 PM EST
ROFL minimum wage
- (boxley)
- (37)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 03:35:14 PM EST
Hmmm...
- (Another Scott)
- (16)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 03:43:17 PM EST
Re: Hmmm...
- (boxley)
- (15)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 03:53:13 PM EST
Got a linky? Thanks.
-NT
- (Another Scott)
- (14)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 03:54:38 PM EST
Go to McWendy Kingchicken.
- (beepster)
- (1)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 04:06:48 PM EST
Not around here. YMMV.
- (Another Scott)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 04:08:48 PM EST
here ya go
- (boxley)
- (11)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 04:10:47 PM EST
Counterpoint.
- (Another Scott)
- (10)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 04:29:58 PM EST
you respond to the leading economic paper in the US
- (boxley)
- (1)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 05:23:37 PM EST
The WSJ's Editorial Page is as right wing as WND.
- (Another Scott)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 08:32:58 PM EST
here, have a graph
- (boxley)
- (4)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 05:37:35 PM EST
Correlation is not causality.
- (Another Scott)
- (3)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 10:09:28 PM EST
Re: Correlation is not causality.
- (boxley)
- (2)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 10:33:00 PM EST
<head against brick wall> ;-)
-NT
- (Another Scott)
- (1)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 10:44:33 PM EST
yeah look how many posts it took me :-)
- (boxley)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 11:13:49 PM EST
NJ
- (beepster)
- (2)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 07:06:36 PM EST
Evidence, please.
- (Another Scott)
- (1)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 08:28:18 PM EST
check the graph ^ makes my point
-NT
- (boxley)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 08:39:33 PM EST
That's a crock
- (jake123)
- (17)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 04:12:27 PM EST
Yup, you raise the minimum wage . . .
- (Andrew Grygus)
- (16)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 04:46:07 PM EST
The thing is, around here
- (jake123)
- (15)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 04:49:49 PM EST
Yup.
- (Another Scott)
- (14)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 04:56:52 PM EST
Shorter workweek is absolutely needed
- (drook)
- (11)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 05:14:25 PM EST
Re: Shorter workweek is absolutely needed
- (boxley)
- (9)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 05:26:22 PM EST
Companies hate it
- (jay)
- (8)
- Jan. 8, 2010, 11:22:22 AM EST
Good points and a good idea.
- (Another Scott)
- (7)
- Jan. 8, 2010, 11:49:53 AM EST
Don't qualify for benefits if you don't work 32 hours.
-NT
- (folkert)
- (1)
- Jan. 8, 2010, 02:37:06 PM EST
Obviously that's the big change the Govt. would have to make
- (drook)
- Jan. 8, 2010, 02:44:32 PM EST
And this would change things how?
- (beepster)
- (3)
- Jan. 8, 2010, 06:55:44 PM EST
RCP?
- (Another Scott)
- (2)
- Jan. 8, 2010, 07:24:52 PM EST
and it worked so well in France
- (beepster)
- (1)
- Jan. 8, 2010, 07:52:13 PM EST
Hmmm.
- (Another Scott)
- Jan. 8, 2010, 08:44:09 PM EST
Re: Good points and a good idea.
- (jay)
- Jan. 9, 2010, 12:54:54 PM EST
maybe a better idea
- (boxley)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 11:16:45 PM EST
Re: Yup.
- (beepster)
- (1)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 07:10:49 PM EST
I remember it differently.
- (Another Scott)
- Jan. 7, 2010, 08:22:14 PM EST
Re: ROFL minimum wage
- (lincoln)
- (1)
- Jan. 8, 2010, 10:27:46 AM EST
Well..
- (beepster)
- Jan. 8, 2010, 11:23:37 AM EST
